Author
Listed:
- Kepa Mendibil
- Jillian MacBryde
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to highlight the factors that enable and/or constrain the design and implementation of team‐based performance measurement systems. Design/methodology/approach - This research study departed from an industrially‐led project. The research strategies used (i.e. case studies, industrial workshops and action research) are suited to the applied and empirical nature of the study. The paper reviews the existing literature on team performance measurement. It then presents the findings based on a exploratory phase and a theory refinement phase. Findings - The results of this study suggest that there are eleven factors affecting the design and implementation of TPMS. It also suggests that these factors are inter‐related with each other. As a result, the impact of one factor can reduce and even eliminate the impact of other factors. Research limitations/implications - There are two main limitations of this research. Firstly, carrying out more than one longitudinal study would increase the validity of the findings. Secondly, evidence was mainly gathered from companies from the manufacturing sector. Practical implications - These findings provide senior managers, human resource specialists and team leaders with the foundations to create the right conditions to design and implement TPMS. Originality/value - The main contribution this paper makes is that it highlights the factors affecting the design and implementation of measurement system in the context of teams. This research identifies three factors (i.e. team maturity, focus and content of appraisal and reward systems, business process view) that are specific to TPMS design and that have not been fully addressed by previous research.
Suggested Citation
Kepa Mendibil & Jillian MacBryde, 2006.
"Factors that affect the design and implementation of team‐based performance measurement systems,"
International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 55(2), pages 118-142, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ijppmp:17410400610641708
DOI: 10.1108/17410400610641708
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ijppmp:17410400610641708. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.