IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eme/ejimpp/14601061011013258.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Antikainen
  • Marko Mäkipää
  • Mikko Ahonen

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore collaboration in open innovation (OI) communities. The paper focuses on the following two research problems: how can users be motivated to collaborate in OI communities and what kind of tools and methods can support collaboration in OI communities? Design/methodology/approach - The exploratory case study includes three innovation intermediaries originated in three different countries: France, The Netherlands and Finland. The primary data source consists of the open‐ended questions posted to the maintainers and users by e‐mail. The data include five responses from the maintainers and 12 responses from the users. The secondary source is the internet document review. The classification of the factors in the preliminary framework is derived from reading and rereading the answers of the respondents until the themes started emerging from the data. Thereafter, the data are coded according to the chosen themes. Findings - Results suggest that monetary rewards are not always the best way to motivate contributing users. Instead, contributors appreciate many intangible factors, such as community cooperation, learning new ideas and having entertainment. Contributors also appreciate good support and the right cooperation tools from their service provider. Research limitations/implications - The data are based on three cases and a limited amount of participants. Therefore, it may be that in gathering empirical data from a larger group of cases, some new factors will be found. Practical implications - Companies should provide community members with tools that are easy to use, allowing people to express themselves and share their personal details. It seems to be important that maintainers are involved as visible members of a community, which includes telling about themselves in a more detailed way. Originality/value - This paper is one of the first papers focusing on the collaboration perspective of OI communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Antikainen & Marko Mäkipää & Mikko Ahonen, 2010. "Motivating and supporting collaboration in open innovation," European Journal of Innovation Management, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(1), pages 100-119, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:eme:ejimpp:14601061011013258
    DOI: 10.1108/14601061011013258
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14601061011013258/full/html?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/14601061011013258/full/pdf?utm_source=repec&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=repec
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1108/14601061011013258?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ancona, Andrea & Cerqueti, Roy & Grassi, Rosanna, 2024. "How do partner selection strategies affect the amount of funding in collaborative research projects? Evidence using the dual-projection approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    2. Julia Amann & Claudia Zanini & Sara Rubinelli, 2016. "What Online User Innovation Communities Can Teach Us about Capturing the Experiences of Patients Living with Chronic Health Conditions. A Scoping Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(6), pages 1-26, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ejimpp:14601061011013258. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.