Author
Abstract
Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to provide a conceptual model of the standard employment interview that practitioners may use to improve their interview skills and the accuracy of their selection decisions. Design/methodology/approach - The dynamics of each discrete stage of the interview model are supported by empirical findings from the research literature on employment interviewing. Findings - An interview transitions through four naturally occurring stages: the initial impression formed in the first few seconds when the candidate and interviewer first lay eyes on one another; a rapport building stage of several minutes to help each party settle in; the body of the interview in which job skills and culture-fit are assessed; and the close, when the interviewer asks if the candidate has any questions about the job or company. Research limitations/implications - Implications for research include providing solutions to the problem of difficult-to-control personal biases (especially during Stages 1 and 2), as well as conducting holistic studies that include the factors that influence decision making across all four stages to determine their relative weights. Practical implications - The four stage model can be used to design interview training programs. By dividing the interview into discrete stages, practitioners can become aware of the pitfalls within each stage and use evidence-based findings to correct mistakes. Social implications - Companies and job candidates benefit alike when selection is based on job skills and person-organization fit rather than on how well job candidates can interview. Originality/value - This is the first paper to propose that employment interviews move through four discrete stages and to support the assertion with findings from secondary empirical research.
Suggested Citation
Uco J. Wiersma, 2016.
"The four stages of the employment interview,"
Evidence-based HRM, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(3), pages 232-239, December.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:ebhrmp:ebhrm-11-2015-0045
DOI: 10.1108/EBHRM-11-2015-0045
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:ebhrmp:ebhrm-11-2015-0045. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.