Author
Listed:
- Zhiyuan Pan
- Xu Zheng
- Qiang Chen
Abstract
Purpose - – This study aims to propose a model-free statistic that tests asymmetric correlations of stock returns, in which stocks move more often with the market when the market goes down than when it goes up, and then empirically analyze the asymmetric correlations of the China stock market and international stock markets, respectively. Design/methodology/approach - – Using empirical likelihood method, this study designs and conducts a model-free test, which converges toχ2 distribution under regulated conditions and performs well in the finite sample using bootstrap critical value method. Findings - – By analyzing the authors' model-free test, the authors find that compared with Honget al.'s test that closely relates to the authors, both of the tests are under rejected using asymptotic critical value. However, using the bootstrap critical value method can greatly improve the performance of the two tests. Second, investigating the power of the two tests, the authors find that the proportion of rejections of the authors' test is roughly 10-20 percent larger than Honget al.'s test in mixed copula model setting. The last finding is the authors find evidence of asymmetric for small-cap size portfolios, but no evidence for middle-cap and large-cap size portfolios in the China stock market. Besides, the authors test asymmetric correlations between the USA and Japan, France and the UK; the asymmetric phenomenon exists in international stock markets, which is similar to Longin and Solnik's findings, but they are not significant according to both the authors' test and Honget al.'s test. Research limitations/implications - – The findings in this study suggest that both the authors' test and Honget al.'s test are under rejected using asymptotic critical value. When applying these statistics to test asymmetric correlations, the authors should take care with the choice of critical value. Practical implications - – The empirical analysis has a significant practical implication for asset allocation, asset pricing and risk management fields. Originality/value - – This study constructs a model-free statistic to test asymmetric correlations using empirical likelihood method for the first time and corrects the size performance by bootstrap method, which improves the performance of Honget al.'s test. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to test the asymmetric correlations in the China stock market.
Suggested Citation
Zhiyuan Pan & Xu Zheng & Qiang Chen, 2014.
"Testing asymmetric correlations in stock returns via empirical likelihood method,"
China Finance Review International, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 4(1), pages 42-57, February.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:cfripp:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:42-57
DOI: 10.1108/CFRI-08-2012-0091
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Pan, Zhiyuan & Zheng, Xu & Gong, Yuting, 2015.
"A model-free test for contagion between crude oil and stock markets,"
Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 1-4.
- Ji, Qiang & Liu, Bing-Yue & Nehler, Henrik & Uddin, Gazi Salah, 2018.
"Uncertainties and extreme risk spillover in the energy markets: A time-varying copula-based CoVaR approach,"
Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 115-126.
- Zhou, Chunyang & Qin, Xiao, 2021.
"Time-varying asymmetric tail dependence of international equities markets,"
Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:cfripp:v:4:y:2014:i:1:p:42-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.