Author
Listed:
- Bruce J. Sherrick
- Christopher A. Lanoue
- Joshua Woodard
- Gary D. Schnitkey
- Nicholas D. Paulson
Abstract
Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to contribute to the empirical evidence about crop yield distributions that are often used in practical models evaluating crop yield risk and insurance. Additionally, a simulation approach is used to compare the performance of alternative specifications when the underlying form is not known, to identify implications for the choice of parameterization of yield distributions in modeling contexts. Design/methodology/approach - – Using a unique high-quality farm-level corn yield data set, commonly used parametric, semi-parametric, and non-parametric distributions are examined against widely used in-sample goodness-of-fit (GOF) measures. Then, a simulation framework is used to assess the out-of-sample characteristics by using known distributions to generate samples that are assessed in an insurance valuation context under alternative specifications of the yield distribution. Findings - – Bias and efficiency trade-offs are identified for both in- and out-of-sample contexts, including a simple insurance rating application. Use of GOF measures in small samples can lead to inappropriate selection of candidate distributions that perform poorly in straightforward economic applications. Theβdistribution consistently overstates rates even when fitted to data generated from aβdistribution, while the Weibull consistently understates rates; though small sample features slightly favor Weibull. The TCMN and kernel density estimators are least biased in-sample, but can perform very badly out-of-sample due to overfitting issues. The TCMN performs reasonably well across sample sizes and initial conditions. Practical implications - – Economic applications should consider the consequence of bias vs efficiency in the selection of characterizations of yield risk. Parsimonious specifications often outperform more complex characterizations of yield distributions in small sample settings, and in cases where more demanding uses of extreme-event probabilities are required. Originality/value - – The study helps provide guidance on the selection of distributions used to characterize yield risk and provides an extensive empirical demonstration of yield risk measures across a high-quality set of actual farm experiences. The out-of-sample examination provides evidence of the impact of sample size, underlying variability, and region of the probability measure used on the performance of candidate distributions.
Suggested Citation
Bruce J. Sherrick & Christopher A. Lanoue & Joshua Woodard & Gary D. Schnitkey & Nicholas D. Paulson, 2014.
"Crop yield distributions: fit, efficiency, and performance,"
Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 74(3), pages 348-363, August.
Handle:
RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:74:y:2014:i:3:p:348-363
DOI: 10.1108/AFR-05-2013-0021
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- A Ford Ramsey, 2020.
"Probability Distributions of Crop Yields: A Bayesian Spatial Quantile Regression Approach,"
American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 102(1), pages 220-239, January.
- Agarwal, Sandip Kumar, 2017.
"Subjective beliefs and decision making under uncertainty in the field,"
ISU General Staff Papers
201701010800006248, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eme:afrpps:v:74:y:2014:i:3:p:348-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Emerald Support (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.