IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ekz/ekonoz/2008105.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Políticas económicas y ambientales eficientes en un contexto de equilibrio general aplicado

Author

Listed:
  • Francisco Javier André García

    (Universidad Pablo de Olavide)

  • M. Alejandro Cardenete Flores

    (Universidad Pablo de Olavide)

Abstract

The measures taken in order to fight against the climate change can create conflict when trying to achieve certain economic goals. That is why the design of economic and environmental policies can be understood as a multi-criteria decision problem. In this article we tackle the design of public policies combining multi-criteria techniques and the modeling of computable general equilibrium. More precisely, we define the “efficient policy” concept and we apply such definitions to the Spanish economy with the 2000 year data. The methodology proposed enables the construction of a set of efficient policies in terms of economic growth and polluting emissions. We also illustrate how to address problems with a larger set of policy objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Francisco Javier André García & M. Alejandro Cardenete Flores, 2008. "Políticas económicas y ambientales eficientes en un contexto de equilibrio general aplicado," EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, Gobierno Vasco / Eusko Jaurlaritza / Basque Government, vol. 67(01), pages 72-91.
    • Handle: RePEc:ekz:ekonoz:2008105
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ogasun.ejgv.euskadi.net/r51-k86aekon/es/k86aEkonomiazWar/ekonomiaz/downloadPDF?R01HNoPortal=true&idpubl=62®istro=894
    File Function: complete text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bell, Michelle L. & Hobbs, Benjamin F. & Ellis, Hugh, 2003. "The use of multi-criteria decision-making methods in the integrated assessment of climate change: implications for IA practitioners," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 289-316, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Weizhong & Chen, Yu & Zhang, Tinglong & Deveci, Muhammet & Kadry, Seifedine, 2024. "The use of AI to uncover the supply chain dynamics of the primary sector: Building resilience in the food supply chain," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 544-566.
    2. Valentin Bertsch & Wolf Fichtner, 2016. "A participatory multi-criteria approach for power generation and transmission planning," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 245(1), pages 177-207, October.
    3. Siew, Tuck Fatt, 2008. "Transferable decision-making procedure for integrated flood management: A theoretical approach to the micro studies of human decision-making and decision makers heuristics," Working Papers 49-2008, University of Freiburg, Chair of Forestry Economics and Planning.
    4. Marttunen, Mika & Haara, Arto & Hjerppe, Turo & Kurttila, Mikko & Liesiö, Juuso & Mustajoki, Jyri & Saarikoski, Heli & Tolvanen, Anne, 2023. "Parallel and comparative use of three multicriteria decision support methods in an environmental portfolio problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 307(2), pages 842-859.
    5. Wulf, David & Bertsch, Valentin, 2016. "A natural language generation approach to support understanding and traceability of multi-dimensional preferential sensitivity analysis in multi-criteria decision making," MPRA Paper 75025, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    6. Milutinović, Biljana & Stefanović, Gordana & Đekić, Petar S. & Mijailović, Ivan & Tomić, Mladen, 2017. "Environmental assessment of waste management scenarios with energy recovery using life cycle assessment and multi-criteria analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 917-926.
    7. Mardani, Abbas & Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras & Khalifah, Zainab & Zakuan, Norhayati & Jusoh, Ahmad & Nor, Khalil Md & Khoshnoudi, Masoumeh, 2017. "A review of multi-criteria decision-making applications to solve energy management problems: Two decades from 1995 to 2015," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 216-256.
    8. S. Scrieciu & Zaid Chalabi, 2014. "Climate policy planning and development impact assessment," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 255-260, March.
    9. Alan Renwick & Robyn Dynes & Paul Johnstone & Warren King & Lania Holt & Jemma Penelope, 2019. "Challenges and Opportunities for Land Use Transformation: Insights from the Central Plains Water Scheme in New Zealand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(18), pages 1-18, September.
    10. Meng-Chuan Tsai & Chin-Tsai Lin, 2012. "Selecting an Optimal Region by Fuzzy Group Decision Making: Empirical Evidence from Medical Investors," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 21(3), pages 399-416, May.
    11. Frank van Kouwen & Carel Dieperink & Paul P. Schot & Martin J. Wassen, 2007. "Interactive Problem Structuring with ICZM Stakeholders," Working Papers 2007.52, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    12. Peter W. Tait & Elizabeth G. Hanna, 2015. "A Conceptual Framework for Planning Systemic Human Adaptation to Global Warming," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, August.
    13. Hosam Alhakami & Tahani Alsubait & Wajdi Alhakami & Hatim Alhakami & Rushdi Alhakami & Mohammed Alhakami & Raees Ahmad Khan & Md Tarique Jamal Ansari, 2023. "Advancing Sustainable Healthcare through Enhanced Therapeutic Communication with Elderly Patients in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-19, November.
    14. Giuseppe Munda, 2022. "Qualitative reasoning or quantitative aggregation rules for impact assessment of policy options? A multiple criteria framework," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 56(5), pages 3259-3277, October.
    15. Паламарчук Е.С., 2013. "Оценка Риска В Линейных Экономических Системах При Отрицательных Временных Предпочтениях," Журнал Экономика и математические методы (ЭММ), Центральный Экономико-Математический Институт (ЦЭМИ), vol. 49(3), pages 99-116, июль.
    16. Tobias Witt & Matthias Klumpp, 2021. "Multi-Period Multi-Criteria Decision Making under Uncertainty: A Renewable Energy Transition Case from Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-20, June.
    17. Chin-Tsai Lin & Meng-Chuan Tsai, 2010. "Location choice for direct foreign investment in new hospitals in China by using ANP and TOPSIS," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 375-390, February.
    18. Zhou, P. & Ang, B.W. & Poh, K.L., 2006. "Decision analysis in energy and environmental modeling: An update," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 31(14), pages 2604-2622.
    19. van Kouwen, Frank & Dieperink, Carel & Schot, Paul P. & Wassen, Martin J., 2007. "Interactive Problem Structuring with ICZM Stakeholders," Natural Resources Management Working Papers 9555, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM).
    20. Chicco, Gianfranco & Stephenson, Paule M., 2012. "Effectiveness of setting cumulative carbon dioxide emissions reduction targets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 19-31.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    economic policy; enviromental policy; efficiency; multicriteria decision; making general equilibrium computable models;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C61 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Optimization Techniques; Programming Models; Dynamic Analysis
    • C68 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computable General Equilibrium Models
    • D78 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Positive Analysis of Policy Formulation and Implementation
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ekz:ekonoz:2008105. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Iñaki Treviño (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debages.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.