IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wodepe/v24y2021ics2452292921000837.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Why is it so difficult to promote territorial development through public policies? The obstacles faced by a Brazilian experience

Author

Listed:
  • Antunes Junior, Wolney Felippe
  • Borsatto, Ricardo Serra
  • Souza-Esquerdo, Vanilde Ferreira de

Abstract

The use of the territorial approach to confronting structural problems in regions with low levels of socio-economic development has motivated the experimentation of a series of public policies around the world. The objective of this article is to analyze, based on a Brazilian experience, the obstacles encountered by public policies in promoting processes for territorial development. The discussions proposed here were based on the case of the São Paulo’s Southwestern Territory, which experienced, between 2003 and 2016, the three national policies with territorial focus studied in this research: the Zero Hunger Program, the National Program for the Sustainable Development of Rural Territories (PRONAT), and the Territorial Citizenship Program (PTC). The data was collected through semi-structured interviews and documentary evidence. The analysis was based on the institutional arrangements approach. As a result, we found that territorial policies encountered difficulties to go beyond the sectoral scale, promote inter-municipal actions, and diversify the social actors involved. Our main finding was that this occurred due to three types of fragmentation in territorial policies, which we call sectoral, spatial and top-down fragmentation. As lessons and paths to be followed, we first emphasize that Brazil needs to return to an agenda that considers the territorial approach to development; then we indicate that public investments need to be constant and long-term; territorial committees need to be autonomous and legally capable of managing public resources; we suggest linking territorially focused policies with the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and the 2030 Agenda; Finally, we recommend an approximation between the territorial approach to policies and the neo-endogenous framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Antunes Junior, Wolney Felippe & Borsatto, Ricardo Serra & Souza-Esquerdo, Vanilde Ferreira de, 2021. "Why is it so difficult to promote territorial development through public policies? The obstacles faced by a Brazilian experience," World Development Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 24(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:wodepe:v:24:y:2021:i:c:s2452292921000837
    DOI: 10.1016/j.wdp.2021.100367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452292921000837
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.wdp.2021.100367?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Schattan P. Coelho, Vera & Favareto, Arilson, 2008. "Questioning the Relationship between Participation and Development: A case study of the Vale do Ribeira, Brazil," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(12), pages 2937-2952, December.
    2. Ortega, Antonio César, 2007. "Desenvolvimento territorial rural no Brasil: limites e potencialidades dos CONSADs," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 45(2), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Marek Furmankiewicz, 2012. "Leader+ Territorial Governance In Poland: Successes And Failures As A Rational Choice Effect," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 103(3), pages 261-275, July.
    4. Leite, Sergio Pereira & Wesz Júnior, Valdemar João, 2012. "Um Estudo Sobre o Financiamento da Política de Desenvolvimento Territorial no Meio Rural Brasileiro," Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural (RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 50(4), January.
    5. José Antonio Cañete & Francisco Navarro & Eugenio Cejudo, 2018. "Territorially unequal rural development: the cases of the LEADER Initiative and the PRODER Programme in Andalusia (Spain)," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(4), pages 726-744, April.
    6. Grisa, Catia & Schneider, Sergio, 2014. "Três Gerações de Políticas Públicas para a Agricultura Familiar e Formas de Interação entre Sociedade e Estado no Brasil," Brazilian Journal of Rural Economy and Sociology (Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural-RESR), Sociedade Brasileira de Economia e Sociologia Rural, vol. 52(Supplemen), pages 1-22, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Usman Sattar, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework of Climate Action Needs of the Least Developed Party Countries of the Paris Agreement," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marek Furmankiewicz & Adrian Campbell, 2019. "From Single-Use Community Facilities Support to Integrated Sustainable Development: The Aims of Inter-Municipal Cooperation in Poland, 1990–2018," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Konečný Ondřej, 2019. "The Leader Approach Across The European Union: One Method of Rural Development, Many Forms of Implementation," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, March.
    3. Mercedes Rodriguez & Luis Miguel Sanchez & Eugenio Cejudo & Jose Antonio Camacho, 2019. "Variety in local development strategies and employment: LEADER programme in Andalusia," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(1), pages 43-50.
    4. Alexandru Olar & Mugurel I. Jitea, 2021. "Enabling Factors for Better Multiplier Effects of the LEADER Programme: Lessons from Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-14, May.
    5. Furmankiewicz, Marek, 2012. "Partnerstwo Międzysektorowe Czy Kolejne Narzędzie Władz Samorządowych? „Ukryty” Sektor Publiczny W Lokalnych Grupach Działania W Polsce," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 4(157).
    6. Eugenio Cejudo-García & Francisco Navarro-Valverde & José Antonio Cañete-Pérez, 2022. "Who Decides and Who Invests? The Role of the Public, Private and Third Sectors in Rural Development according to Geographical Contexts: The LEADER Approach in Andalusia, 2007–2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-20, March.
    7. Bram van Vulpen, 2020. "Rethinking The Regional Bounds Of Justice: A Scoping Review Of Spatial Justice In Eu Regions," Romanian Journal of Regional Science, Romanian Regional Science Association, vol. 14(2), pages 5-34, DECEMBER.
    8. Eric Sabourin, 2022. "Public Policies for Sustainable Territorial Development in Brazil: Between Clientelism and Participation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, March.
    9. Ana-Maria Opria & Lucian Roșu & Corneliu Iațu, 2021. "LEADER Program—An Inclusive or Selective Instrument for the Development of Rural Space in Romania?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Fonseca Morello, Thiago, 2022. "Subsidization of mechanized tillage as an alternative to fire-based land preparation by smallholders: An economic appraisal of the case of southwestern Brazilian Amazon," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    11. Gema Cárdenas Alonso & Ana Nieto Masot, 2017. "Towards Rural Sustainable Development? Contributions of the EAFRD 2007–2013 in Low Demographic Density Territories: The Case of Extremadura (SW Spain)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    12. Xuesong Xi & Haiyun Xu & Qiang Zhao & Guohan Zhao, 2021. "Making Rural Micro-Regeneration Strategies Based on Resident Perceptions and Preferences for Traditional Village Conservation and Development: The Case of Huangshan Village, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-24, July.
    13. Herscovici Arie & Akirav Osnat, 2024. "Regional development policy in Galilee periphery in Israel," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(2), June.
    14. Berdegué, Julio A. & Escobal, Javier & Bebbington, Anthony, 2015. "Explaining Spatial Diversity in Latin American Rural Development: Structures, Institutions, and Coalitions," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 129-137.
    15. Pere Serra & Montserrat Pallares-Barbera & Luca Salvati, 2023. "Can a long-term economic subsidy counteract rural depopulation? An empirical analysis from two spanish regions," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 3065-3084, August.
    16. Fałkowski, Jan, 2017. "Promoting change or preserving the status quo? The consequences of dominating local politics by agricultural interests," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 448-459.
    17. Thuessen Annette Aagaard & Nielsen Niels Christian, 2014. "A Territorial Perspective On Eu´S Leader Approach In Denmark: The Added Value Of Community-Led Local Development Of Rural And Coastal Areas In A Multi-Level Governance Settings," European Countryside, Sciendo, vol. 6(4), pages 307-326, December.
    18. Pedro Sánchez-Zamora & Rosa Gallardo-Cobos, 2019. "Diversity, Disparity and Territorial Resilience in the Context of the Economic Crisis: An Analysis of Rural Areas in Southern Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-21, March.
    19. Vilpoux, Olivier François & Gonzaga, Jenifer Ferreira & Pereira, Matheus Wemerson Gomes, 2021. "Agrarian reform in the Brazilian Midwest: Difficulties of modernization via conventional or organic production systems," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    20. da Costa Lima Pires, Pâmela & da Silva César, Aldara & Cardoso, Alexandre Nunes & Favaro, Simone Palma & Conejero, Marco Antonio, 2023. "Strategies to improve the competitiveness of an agroindustrial system for a macauba based oil production in Minas Gerais State, Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wodepe:v:24:y:2021:i:c:s2452292921000837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/world-development-perspectives .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.