IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/wdevel/v173y2024ics0305750x23002358.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The place of religious inequalities within international development and humanitarian response frameworks: Lessons from Iraq

Author

Listed:
  • Sabates-Wheeler, Rachel
  • Barker, Jeremy P.

Abstract

Within the international development and humanitarian arenas no one disagrees with the language and aspirations of inclusion, protection, rights and equality. Yet, most development framings – policy and operational – have still to develop meaningful ways to attend to the specific advantages or disadvantages associated with religious views or beliefs that shape the way people and communities function and behave within society. This paper explores influential conceptual and programmatic framings of international development and humanitarian response, specifically the human development approach, capital and asset-based framings, horizontal inequalities, the SDGs and humanitarian principles. We analyse the extent to which they engage with considerations of religious inequalities (religious diversity, identity, inclusion) and language of ‘religion’ and belief. Drawing on an evidenced-based case study of humanitarian/development responses in Iraq in the period from 2014 to 2019, the paper illustrates the reality of how a smorgasbord of religion-blind development concepts and framings interplay at the frontline of a humanitarian response to conflict, and the ways in which multiple actors wrestle and flex to design, target and implement programmes that were conceived in a religion-blind frame. The research shows how the explicit incorporation of the context and nature of religious diversity dynamics into frameworks has critical real-world impacts on the design, delivery, monitoring and impacts of interventions. Failing to incorporate an understanding of inequalities experienced by people marginalized because of their religious affiliation or belief (whether intentional or through mere oversight) has very likely muted the hoped-for outcomes of many development and emergency response initiatives. Our hope is that international development and humanitarian framings can better deliver on their objective to “leave no one behind” by ensuring inequalities on account of religious identity or practice are appropriately considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Sabates-Wheeler, Rachel & Barker, Jeremy P., 2024. "The place of religious inequalities within international development and humanitarian response frameworks: Lessons from Iraq," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:173:y:2024:i:c:s0305750x23002358
    DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106417
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305750X23002358
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106417?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sen, Amartya, 2001. "Development as Freedom," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192893307.
    2. Amartya Sen, 2005. "Human Rights and Capabilities," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 6(2), pages 151-166.
    3. Alkire, Sabina, 2002. "Dimensions of Human Development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(2), pages 181-205, February.
    4. Howe, Paul, 2019. "The triple nexus: A potential approach to supporting the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Deneulin, Séverine & Rakodi, Carole, 2011. "Revisiting Religion: Development Studies Thirty Years On," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 45-54, January.
    6. Frances Stewart, 2009. "Horizontal Inequality: Two Types of Trap," Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(3), pages 315-340.
    7. Lele, Sharachchandra M., 1991. "Sustainable development: A critical review," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 19(6), pages 607-621, June.
    8. Tang, Yang & Ni, Xinwen, 2019. "Understanding the Role of Housing in Inequality and Social Mobility," IRTG 1792 Discussion Papers 2019-010, Humboldt University of Berlin, International Research Training Group 1792 "High Dimensional Nonstationary Time Series".
    9. Frances Stewart, 2009. "Religion versus Ethnicity as a Source of Mobilisation: Are There Differences?," Research Working Papers 18, MICROCON - A Micro Level Analysis of Violent Conflict.
    10. Jolly, Richard, 1991. "Adjustment with a human face: A UNICEF record and perspective on the 1980s," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 19(12), pages 1807-1821, December.
    11. Wilber, Charles K. & Jameson, Kenneth P., 1980. "Religious values and social limits to development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 8(7-8), pages 467-479.
    12. Chris Seiple & Dennis R. Hoover, 2021. "A Case for Cross-Cultural Religious Literacy," The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(1), pages 1-13, January.
    13. Gore, Charles, 2000. "The Rise and Fall of the Washington Consensus as a Paradigm for Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 28(5), pages 789-804, May.
    14. Oecd, 2019. "Understanding online consumer ratings and reviews," OECD Digital Economy Papers 289, OECD Publishing.
    15. Mariz Tadros, 2022. "Religious Equality and Freedom of Religion or Belief: International Development’s Blindspot," The Review of Faith & International Affairs, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(2), pages 96-108, April.
    16. Kurt Alan Ver Beek, 2000. "Spirituality: A development taboo," Development in Practice, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(1), pages 31-43, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tadros, Mariz & Shutt, Catherine, 2024. "Gender in development: What lessons for addressing inequality on the grounds of religion or (non)-belief?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    2. Sachie Mizohata & Raynald Jadoul, 2013. "Towards International and Interdisciplinary Research Collaboration for the Measurements of Quality of Life," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 111(3), pages 683-708, May.
    3. Rafael Horn & Hanaa Dahy & Johannes Gantner & Olga Speck & Philip Leistner, 2018. "Bio-Inspired Sustainability Assessment for Building Product Development—Concept and Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-25, January.
    4. Sepideh Yousefzadeh & Mario Biggeri & Caterina Arciprete & Hinke Haisma, 2019. "A Capability Approach to Child Growth," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(2), pages 711-731, April.
    5. Robinson, Jude & Chiumento, Anna & Kasujja, Rosco & Rutayisire, Theoneste & White, Ross, 2022. "The ‘good life’, personal appearance, and mental health of Congolese refugees in Rwanda and Uganda," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    6. Smith, Amy Erica, 2017. "Democratic Talk in Church: Religion and Political Socialization in the Context of Urban Inequality," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 441-451.
    7. Paul Oghenero Okumagba & Otega Okinono, 2016. "Human Capability and Entrepreneurial Development in the Niger Delta Region of Nigeria," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 8(1), pages 38-46.
    8. Deneulin, Séverine & Zampini-Davies, Augusto, 2017. "Engaging development and religion: Methodological groundings," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 110-121.
    9. Leonie C. Steckermeier, 2021. "The Value of Autonomy for the Good Life. An Empirical Investigation of Autonomy and Life Satisfaction in Europe," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 154(2), pages 693-723, April.
    10. Calvo, Cesar, 2008. "Vulnerability to Multidimensional Poverty: Peru, 1998-2002," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 1011-1020, June.
    11. KASRI, RAHMATINA & Ahmed, Habib, 2015. "Assessing Socio-Economic Development based on Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah Principles: Normative Frameworks, Methods and Implementation in Indonesia," Islamic Economic Studies, The Islamic Research and Training Institute (IRTI), vol. 23, pages 73-100.
    12. Smith, Jonathan D., 2017. "Positioning Missionaries in Development Studies, Policy, and Practice," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 63-76.
    13. Ishrat Ali & Griffin W. Cottle, 2021. "Reconceptualizing Entrepreneurial Performance: The Creation and Destruction of Value from a Stakeholder Capabilities Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 781-796, May.
    14. Tim Goedemé & Tess Penne & Otto Swedrup & Karel Van den Bosch & Bérénice Storms, 2019. "Exploring common ground for defining adequate social participation in 24 EU capital cities," Working Papers 1912, Herman Deleeck Centre for Social Policy, University of Antwerp.
    15. Yahya Z. ALSHEHHI, 2017. "Achievements In Terms Of Human Development Dimensions," SEA - Practical Application of Science, Romanian Foundation for Business Intelligence, Editorial Department, issue 13, pages 109-125, May.
    16. Lennon, Mick & Douglas, Owen & Scott, Mark, 2019. "Responsive environments: An outline of a method for determining context sensitive planning interventions to enhance health and wellbeing," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 68-78.
    17. Greco, Giulia & Skordis-Worrall, Jolene & Mkandawire, Bryan & Mills, Anne, 2015. "What is a good life? Selecting capabilities to assess women's quality of life in rural Malawi," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 69-78.
    18. Leonie C. Steckermeier, 2019. "Better Safe than Sorry. Does Agency Moderate the Relevance of Safety Perceptions for the Subjective Well-Being of Young Children?," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 12(1), pages 29-48, February.
    19. Dumitriu, Ramona & Stefanescu, Răzvan, 2015. "Economic development of Comecon countries," MPRA Paper 89012, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 05 Jan 2016.
    20. Joowon Im, 2019. "Green Streets to Serve Urban Sustainability: Benefits and Typology," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-22, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:wdevel:v:173:y:2024:i:c:s0305750x23002358. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/worlddev .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.