IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v6y1999i2p109-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of private seaport development: the port of Felixstowe

Author

Listed:
  • Baird, A.

Abstract

This paper provides a detailed overview of the historical development of the major container port of Felixstowe, the 15th largest such facility in the world, and the fourth largest in Europe after Rotterdam, Hamburg, and Antwerp. The analysis reveals a port, which has developed in a rather unconventional manner compared with most other major ports. Key factors influencing the successful development of the port are evaluated. Key factors impeding the future development of the port are discussed, as is the port's strategy to deal with capacity constraints. The paper considers the role of various public sector entities with regard to port development and regulation and highlights general policy issues brought out from the analysis. The author concludes that full cost recovery for private ports, privatised ports, as well as for public ports, remains an elusive ideal.

Suggested Citation

  • Baird, A., 1999. "Analysis of private seaport development: the port of Felixstowe," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 109-122, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:6:y:1999:i:2:p:109-122
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967-070X(99)00012-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Richard Saundry & Peter Turnbull, 1997. "Private profit, public loss: The financial and economic performance of U.K. ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(4), pages 319-334, January.
    2. Baird, Alfred J, 1995. "Privatisation of trust ports in the United Kingdom: Review and analysis of the first sales," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 2(2), pages 135-143, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. María del Mar Cerbán Jiménez & Juan Ortí Llatas, 2015. "Infraestructuras Portuarias. Análisis del sistema Portuario Espanol Contexto Internacional y propuestas de reforma," Studies on the Spanish Economy eee2015-20, FEDEA.
    2. Zhang, Jihua, 2016. "Quasi-landlord port financing in China: Features, practice and a contract theory analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 73-88.
    3. Chandra Prakash Garg & Vishal Kashav & Xuemuge Wang, 2023. "Evaluating sustainability factors of green ports in China under fuzzy environment," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(8), pages 7795-7821, August.
    4. Cheon, SangHyun, 2007. "World Port Institutions and Productivity: Roles of Ownership, Corporate Structure, and Inter-port Competition," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt7t64h5wr, University of California Transportation Center.
    5. Pallis, Athanasios A. & Syriopoulos, Theodore, 2007. "Port governance models: Financial evaluation of Greek port restructuring," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 14(3), pages 232-246, May.
    6. Gardner, Bernard & Marlow, Peter & Pettit, Stephen, 2006. "Full cost recovery in EU ports operating as commercial undertakings," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 13(1), pages 2-21, January.
    7. Truong Ngoc Cuong & Sam-Sang You & Le Ngoc Bao Long & Hwan-Seong Kim, 2022. "Seaport Resilience Analysis and Throughput Forecast Using a Deep Learning Approach: A Case Study of Busan Port," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-25, October.
    8. Brooks, Mary R. & Cullinane, Kevin, 2006. "Chapter 18 Governance Models Defined," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 405-435, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brooks, Mary R., 2006. "Chapter 25 Issues in Measuring Port Devolution Program Performance: A Managerial Perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 599-629, January.
    2. Baird, Alfred J. & Valentine, Vincent F., 2006. "Chapter 3 Port Privatisation in the United Kingdom," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 55-84, January.
    3. Monios, Jason, 2019. "Geographies of governance in the freight transport sector: The British case," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 295-308.
    4. Lourdes Trujillo & Marianela Gonzalez, 2011. "Maritime Ports," Chapters, in: Matthias Finger & Rolf W. Künneke (ed.), International Handbook of Network Industries, chapter 17, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Woo, Su-Han & Pettit, Stephen J. & Kwak, Dong-Wook & Beresford, Anthony K.C., 2011. "Seaport research: A structured literature review on methodological issues since the 1980s," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 667-685, August.
    6. José I. Castillo-Manzano & Juan P. Asencio-Flores, 2012. "Competition Between New Port Governance Models on the Iberian Peninsula," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(4), pages 519-537, January.
    7. Sergi Saurí & Francesc Robusté, 2012. "Promoting Incentives: Performance Improvement in Container Port Terminals," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 233-246, May.
    8. López-Bermúdez, Beatriz & Freire-Seoane, María Jesús & Pateiro-Rodríguez, Carlos, 2020. "Blue governance: Sustainable port governance," Revista Galega de Economía, University of Santiago de Compostela. Faculty of Economics and Business., vol. 29(3), pages 1-17.
    9. Ha, Min-Ho & Yang, Zaili & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee, 2019. "Port performance in container transport logistics: A multi-stakeholder perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 25-40.
    10. Maryna Tverdostup & Tiiu Paas, 2019. "Economic Performance Analysis Of Selected Blue Economy Sectors In Estonia And Finland," University of Tartu - Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper Series 115, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Tartu (Estonia).
    11. González, MarI´a Manuela & Trujillo, Lourdes, 2008. "Reforms and infrastructure efficiency in Spain's container ports," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 243-257, January.
    12. Jean Debrie, 2010. "Different tiers of government in port governance: some general remarks on the institutional geography of ports in Europe and Canada," Post-Print hal-00615146, HAL.
    13. Pallis, Athanasios A., 2007. "Chapter 11 Whither Port Strategy Theory and Practice in Conflict," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 343-382, January.
    14. Brooks, Mary R. & Cullinane, Kevin, 2006. "Chapter 1 Introduction," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 3-28, January.
    15. Notteboom, Theo & De Langen, Peter & Jacobs, Wouter, 2013. "Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 27(C), pages 26-35.
    16. Theo E. Notteboom & Hercules E. Haralambides, 2020. "Port management and governance in a post-COVID-19 era: quo vadis?," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 22(3), pages 329-352, September.
    17. Brooks, Mary R. & Cullinane, Kevin, 2006. "Chapter 18 Governance Models Defined," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 405-435, January.
    18. Maryna Tverdostup & Tiiu Paas & Mariia Chebotareva, 2022. "What Can Support Cross-Border Cooperation in the Blue Economy? Lessons from Blue Sector Performance Analysis in Estonia and Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Gonzalez, M. & Trujillo, L., 2007. "Efficiency measurement in the port industry: a survey of the empirical evidence," Working Papers 07/08, Department of Economics, City University London.
    20. Grace Wang & Chen Gao, 2012. "Technical Efficiency and Port Competition: Revisiting the Bohai Economic Rim, China," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 5(1), pages 1-16, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:6:y:1999:i:2:p:109-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.