IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transe/v36y2000i2p97-113.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Shipowner preferences and user charges: allocating port infrastructure costs

Author

Listed:
  • Bergantino, A. S.
  • Coppejans, L.

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to present a pricing mechanism appropriate for allocating common maritime infrastructure cost which would allow not only a fair and efficient allocation, but also, a solution which would take into account demand characteristics assuring a realistic interpretation of market's behaviour. The proposed solution concept is that of the "ratio equilibrium". Its main qualities consist in guaranteeing a balanced budget, and being - from a strategic point of view - a stable solution. In other words, no port user will be discouraged from using the infrastructure by the assignment of a cost-share that is too high. This latter feature adds a competitive element into the calculations and can be considered as an innovative feature of this analysis. A numeric example is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Bergantino, A. S. & Coppejans, L., 2000. "Shipowner preferences and user charges: allocating port infrastructure costs," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 97-113, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:36:y:2000:i:2:p:97-113
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136655459900023X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zheng, Shiyuan & Negenborn, Rudy R., 2014. "Centralization or decentralization: A comparative analysis of port regulation modes," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 21-40.
    2. Angela Stefania Bergantino & Enrico Musso, 2011. "A Multi-step Approach to Model the Relative Efficiency of European Ports: The Role of Regulation and Other Non-discretionary Factors," Chapters, in: Kevin Cullinane (ed.), International Handbook of Maritime Economics, chapter 18, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Ishii, Masahiro & Lee, Paul Tae-Woo & Tezuka, Koichiro & Chang, Young-Tae, 2013. "A game theoretical analysis of port competition," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(1), pages 92-106.
    4. Madanat, Samer Michel & Papakonstantinou, Ilia & Lee, Jinwoo, 2019. "The benefits of cooperative policies for transportation network protection from sea level rise: A case study of the San Francisco Bay Area," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1-9.
    5. Papakonstantinou, Ilia & Lee, Jinwoo & Madanat, Samer Michel, 2019. "Game theoretic approaches for highway infrastructure protection against sea level rise: Co-opetition among multiple players," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 21-37.
    6. Angela Stefania Bergantino & Enrico Musso, 2011. "The role of external factors versus managerial ability in determining seaports’ relative efficiency: An input-by-input analysis through a multi-step approach on a panel of Southern European ports," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 13(2), pages 121-141, June.
    7. Abbes, Souhir, 2007. "Marginal social cost pricing in European seaports," European Transport \ Trasporti Europei, ISTIEE, Institute for the Study of Transport within the European Economic Integration, issue 36, pages 4-26.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transe:v:36:y:2000:i:2:p:97-113. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600244/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.