IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v21y1987i4p269-286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Approximate queueing models for analyzing harbor terminal operations

Author

Listed:
  • Easa, Said M.

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to present approximate queueing models to help assess the impacts of tug services on congested harbor terminals. The models are intended for harbors in which tug shortages are rare. A congested harbor terminal is modelled as a queueing system with m identical tugs (servers) and n identical berths (customers), and with general probability distributions of tug service time and berth cargo-handling time. The distribution of the number of berths in the system, a basic element to analyze the system performance, was established for two cases. For large m, the distribution was approximated by a binomial model and the respective accuracy tested. For small m, an approximate model for this distribution was developed. Particular emphasis was given to developing explicitly the probability of having one berth in queue and establishing the remaining probabilities of the distribution approximately. The model for small m was validated by means of simulation for various cases of harbor terminal operations exhibiting different ranges of the coefficient of variation of tug service time. The models were found to be reasonably accurate within a certain range covering situations in which tug shortages are in the order of 10% of the time or less.

Suggested Citation

  • Easa, Said M., 1987. "Approximate queueing models for analyzing harbor terminal operations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 269-286, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:21:y:1987:i:4:p:269-286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191-2615(87)90027-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vibhuti Dhingra & Debjit Roy & René B. M. Koster, 2017. "A cooperative quay crane-based stochastic model to estimate vessel handling time," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 97-124, March.
    2. Jia, Shuai & Li, Chung-Lun & Xu, Zhou, 2020. "A simulation optimization method for deep-sea vessel berth planning and feeder arrival scheduling at a container port," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 174-196.
    3. Milorad Vidovic & Kap Kim, 2006. "Estimating the cycle time of three-stage material handling systems," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 144(1), pages 181-200, April.
    4. Roy, D. & de Koster, M.B.M., 2014. "Modeling and Design of Container Terminal Operations," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2014-008-LIS, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    5. Debjit Roy & René De Koster & René Bekker, 2020. "Modeling and Design of Container Terminal Operations," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(3), pages 686-715, May.
    6. Branislav Dragovic & Nenad Dj. Zrnic, 2011. "A Queuing Model Study of Port Performance Evolution," Analele Universitatii "Eftimie Murgu" Resita Fascicola de Inginerie, "Eftimie Murgu" University of Resita, vol. 2(XVIII), pages 65-76, December.
    7. Ebru K. Bish & Thin‐Yin Leong & Chung‐Lun Li & Jonathan W. C. Ng & David Simchi‐Levi, 2001. "Analysis of a new vehicle scheduling and location problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(5), pages 363-385, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:21:y:1987:i:4:p:269-286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.