IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v21y1987i1p1-27.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dynamic blocking for railyards: Part I. Homogeneous traffic

Author

Listed:
  • Daganzo, Carlos F.

Abstract

This paper and its companion present a study of railroad classification yard strategies that allow for blocks of destinations to be assigned to classification tracks in different ways, depending on the time of day, week or month. With the same number of tracks, more classifications can be handled by this method. The paper examines homogeneous traffic; that is, traffic patterns where all blocks have the same amount of traffic, where cars for all blocks depart equally frequently from the yard and where the overall traffic flow does not change with time. The results represent the beginning of a better understanding of yard operations, which should be useful for designing new yards, planning expansions of existing ones and evaluating the impact of changes (planned and unplanned) on traffic patterns. The paper concentrates on two sorting strategies: sorting by train (perhaps the most commonly used strategy in the United States today), and triangular sorting. For both strategies, formulas are given for the minimum number of tracks, number of switches and for the total space requirements. For triangular sorting, the yard delay and total space depend on the time chosen between reswitches. These two measures of performance can be reduced if one is willing to accept a sorting effort slightly higher than minimum. The trade-off can be explored numerically. For sorting by train, yard delay and total space are not significantly affected by the sorting method; there is no such trade-off. It appears that sorting by train results in less work, delay and space requirements than triangular sorting, at least in most instances when either could be used. Triangular sorting, however, can be used when there are not enough tracks to allow sorting by train.

Suggested Citation

  • Daganzo, Carlos F., 1987. "Dynamic blocking for railyards: Part I. Homogeneous traffic," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 21(1), pages 1-27, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:21:y:1987:i:1:p:1-27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191-2615(87)90018-X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boysen, Nils & Fliedner, Malte & Jaehn, Florian & Pesch, Erwin, 2012. "Shunting yard operations: Theoretical aspects and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(1), pages 1-14.
    2. He, Shiwei & Song, Rui & Chaudhry, Sohail S., 2000. "Fuzzy dispatching model and genetic algorithms for railyards operations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(2), pages 307-331, July.
    3. Shi, Tie & Zhou, Xuesong, 2015. "A mixed integer programming model for optimizing multi-level operations process in railroad yards," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 19-39.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:21:y:1987:i:1:p:1-27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.