IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v153y2021icp172-203.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A New Econometric Approach for Modeling Several Count Variables: A Case Study of Crash Frequency Analysis by Crash Type and Severity

Author

Listed:
  • Bhowmik, Tanmoy
  • Yasmin, Shamsunnahar
  • Eluru, Naveen

Abstract

There is limited adoption of research modeling crash severity frequency considering different crash types due to the challenge associated with analyzing large number of dependent variables. The proposed research contributes to burgeoning econometric and safety literature by developing a joint modeling approach that can accommodate for several dependent variables within a parsimonious structure. By recasting the analysis levels for dependent variables, the proposed approach allows for flexible consideration of crashes by type and severity within a single framework. Specifically, we employ a Panel Mixed Negative Binomial- Generalized Ordered Probit Fractional Spilt (PMNB-GOPFS) model where the first component (NB) accommodates for crash frequency by crash type and the later component (GOPFS) studies the fraction of severity outcome for different crash types. The proposed model system increases interaction between dependent variables through observed variables thus reducing the dependency on unobserved interactions across dependent variables. Thus, the proposed approach allows for the estimation of parsimonious specifications reducing the need for computationally intensive simulation based estimation. The proposed system is also flexible to accommodate for common unobserved effects including: 1) common unobserved factors simultaneously affecting crash counts of different crash types; 2) common unobserved factors simultaneously affecting crash severity proportions of different crash types; and 3) common unobserved factors that simultaneously impact crash counts and severity proportions by different crash types. The model system performance is illustrated using a simulation study. The empirical analysis was conducted using zonal level crash count data for the year 2016 from Central Florida while considering a comprehensive set of exogenous variables including roadway, built environment, land-use, traffic and sociodemographic characteristics. To illustrate the applicability of our proposed system, we carried out a comparison exercise between our proposed joint PMNB-GOPFS and the traditional multivariate system for predicting crash counts across different crash severities. The resulting goodness of fit measures clearly highlight the superior/equivalent performance of the proposed PMNB-GOPFS model over the traditional RPMNB model with less than half the number of parameters. The proposed framework can predict several dimensions including total crash counts, total crash counts by crash types, crash counts for each severity level and finally, proportions and counts of crashes for each crash type by severity.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhowmik, Tanmoy & Yasmin, Shamsunnahar & Eluru, Naveen, 2021. "A New Econometric Approach for Modeling Several Count Variables: A Case Study of Crash Frequency Analysis by Crash Type and Severity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 172-203.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:153:y:2021:i:c:p:172-203
    DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2021.09.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191261521001818
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.trb.2021.09.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bhat, Chandra R., 2001. "Quasi-random maximum simulated likelihood estimation of the mixed multinomial logit model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 677-693, August.
    2. Areti Boulieri & Silvia Liverani & Kees Hoogh & Marta Blangiardo, 2017. "A space–time multivariate Bayesian model to analyse road traffic accidents by severity," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 180(1), pages 119-139, January.
    3. Bhat, Chandra R., 2011. "The maximum approximate composite marginal likelihood (MACML) estimation of multinomial probit-based unordered response choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(7), pages 923-939, August.
    4. Lord, Dominique & Mannering, Fred, 2010. "The statistical analysis of crash-frequency data: A review and assessment of methodological alternatives," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 291-305, June.
    5. Papke, Leslie E & Wooldridge, Jeffrey M, 1996. "Econometric Methods for Fractional Response Variables with an Application to 401(K) Plan Participation Rates," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 11(6), pages 619-632, Nov.-Dec..
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abay, Kibrom A. & Paleti, Rajesh & Bhat, Chandra R., 2013. "The joint analysis of injury severity of drivers in two-vehicle crashes accommodating seat belt use endogeneity," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 74-89.
    2. Paleti, Rajesh, 2018. "Generalized multinomial probit Model: Accommodating constrained random parameters," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 248-262.
    3. Dong, Chunjiao & Shao, Chunfu & Clarke, David B. & Nambisan, Shashi S., 2018. "An innovative approach for traffic crash estimation and prediction on accommodating unobserved heterogeneities," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 407-428.
    4. Xiong, Yingge & Mannering, Fred L., 2013. "The heterogeneous effects of guardian supervision on adolescent driver-injury severities: A finite-mixture random-parameters approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 39-54.
    5. Haghani, Milad & Bliemer, Michiel C.J. & Hensher, David A., 2021. "The landscape of econometric discrete choice modelling research," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    6. Bhat, Chandra R. & Astroza, Sebastian & Bhat, Aarti C. & Nagel, Kai, 2016. "Incorporating a multiple discrete-continuous outcome in the generalized heterogeneous data model: Application to residential self-selection effects analysis in an activity time-use behavior model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 52-76.
    7. Patil, Priyadarshan N. & Dubey, Subodh K. & Pinjari, Abdul R. & Cherchi, Elisabetta & Daziano, Ricardo & Bhat, Chandra R., 2017. "Simulation evaluation of emerging estimation techniques for multinomial probit models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 9-20.
    8. Biswas, Mehek & Bhat, Chandra R. & Ghosh, Sulagna & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, 2024. "Choice models with stochastic variables and random coefficients," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    9. Cherchi, Elisabetta & Guevara, Cristian Angelo, 2012. "A Monte Carlo experiment to analyze the curse of dimensionality in estimating random coefficients models with a full variance–covariance matrix," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 321-332.
    10. Stephane Hess, 2014. "Latent class structures: taste heterogeneity and beyond," Chapters, in: Stephane Hess & Andrew Daly (ed.), Handbook of Choice Modelling, chapter 14, pages 311-330, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Bhat, Chandra R. & Dubey, Subodh K., 2014. "A new estimation approach to integrate latent psychological constructs in choice modeling," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 68-85.
    12. Paleti, Rajesh & Bhat, Chandra R., 2013. "The composite marginal likelihood (CML) estimation of panel ordered-response models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 7(C), pages 24-43.
    13. Becker, Gideon, 2014. "The portfolio structure of German households: A multinomial fractional response approach with unobserved heterogeneity," University of Tübingen Working Papers in Business and Economics 74, University of Tuebingen, Faculty of Economics and Social Sciences, School of Business and Economics.
    14. Bhat, Chandra R., 2018. "New matrix-based methods for the analytic evaluation of the multivariate cumulative normal distribution function," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 238-256.
    15. Rahman, Moshiur & Yasmin, Shamsunnahar & Eluru, Naveen, 2020. "A joint panel binary logit and fractional split model for converting route-level transit ridership data to stop-level boarding and alighting data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1-16.
    16. Prateek Bansal & Vahid Keshavarzzadeh & Angelo Guevara & Shanjun Li & Ricardo A Daziano, 2022. "Designed quadrature to approximate integrals in maximum simulated likelihood estimation [Evaluating simulation-based approaches and multivariate quadrature on sparse grids in estimating multivariat," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(2), pages 301-321.
    17. Xuemei Fu & Zhicai Juan, 2017. "Estimation of multinomial probit-kernel integrated choice and latent variable model: comparison on one sequential and two simultaneous approaches," Transportation, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 91-116, January.
    18. Bhat, Chandra R. & Astroza, Sebastian & Hamdi, Amin S., 2017. "A spatial generalized ordered-response model with skew normal kernel error terms with an application to bicycling frequency," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 126-148.
    19. Kwon, Daye & Liverpool-Tasie, Saweda & Reardon, Thomas A. & Mason-Wardell, Nicole M. & Tasie, Oyinkansola, 2024. "Addressing Conflict and Weather Shocks in Agrifood Value Chains: Policy Preferences of Nigerian Maize Traders," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343947, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    20. Sabreena Anowar & Naveen Eluru & Luis F. Miranda-Moreno, 2014. "Alternative Modeling Approaches Used for Examining Automobile Ownership: A Comprehensive Review," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(4), pages 441-473, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:153:y:2021:i:c:p:172-203. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.