IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v46y2012i8p1280-1290.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From broken windows to a renovated research agenda: A review of the literature on vandalism and graffiti in the rail industry

Author

Listed:
  • Thompson, Kirrilly
  • Offler, Naomi
  • Hirsch, Lily
  • Every, Danielle
  • Thomas, Matthew J.
  • Dawson, Drew

Abstract

The execution of vandalism and graffiti on rail property has a significant impact on rail authorities, the patronisation of rail services, expenditure, and the timely operation of services. There are also important social costs which stem from passengers feeling unsafe, not to mention the environmental costs of removing graffiti and repairing vandalism. In this review paper, we focus on the social, non-technical determinants of and deterrents to vandalism and graffiti in the rail industry. First, we consider the definitions of graffiti and vandalism that are often conflated. After providing some clarification on terminology, and proposing a media-centred approach to vandalism and graffiti, we consider various theorisations of the psychosocial determinants of vandalism and graffiti behaviour. We then turn to an empirical discussion of different technical and social, non-technical prevention programmes that have been trialled. With a focus on identifying what works and under what circumstances, we refer to international case studies of successful vandalism reduction initiatives from Europe, the United Kingdom, the United States of America and Australia. Based on a review of literature and practice, we outline a future research agenda to address vandalism and graffiti. We recommend lines of further research covering: theory, empirical data collection and practical initiatives. Specifically, we note the need for a trans-theoretical model of vandalism and graffiti, further ethnographic research and improved evaluation and benchmarking strategies. This is the first review dedicated to the topic of vandalism and graffiti in the rail industry and the first review of non-technical, social deterrents to vandalism and graffiti broadly.

Suggested Citation

  • Thompson, Kirrilly & Offler, Naomi & Hirsch, Lily & Every, Danielle & Thomas, Matthew J. & Dawson, Drew, 2012. "From broken windows to a renovated research agenda: A review of the literature on vandalism and graffiti in the rail industry," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1280-1290.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:46:y:2012:i:8:p:1280-1290
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856412000663
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2012.04.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McCray, Talia, 2009. "Engaging disadvantaged populations in transport studies: Linking modal use and perceptions of safety to activity patterns," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 3-7.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lorena Bezerra de Souza Matos, 2017. "Visible Expressions of Urban Invisibility: Exploring Pixação," Post-Print hal-03111870, HAL.
    2. Bhati, Abhishek & Pearce, Philip, 2016. "Vandalism and tourism settings: An integrative review," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 91-105.
    3. Alexander, Matthew & Hamilton, Kathy, 2015. "A ‘placeful’ station? The community role in place making and improving hedonic value at local railway stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 65-77.
    4. Marco Giovagnoli, 2017. "Il fenomeno del vandalismo. Dal "vandalismo tradizionale" al "vandalismo in doppio petto"," PRISMA Economia - Societ? - Lavoro, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2017(1-2), pages 82-110.
    5. He, Sylvia Y. & Tao, Sui & Sun, Ka Kit, 2024. "Attitudes towards public transport under extended disruptions and massive-scale transit dysfunction: A Hong Kong case study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 247-258.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:46:y:2012:i:8:p:1280-1290. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.