IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v33y1999i3-4p187-197.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Implementing the maximum likelihood methodology to measure a driver's critical gap

Author

Listed:
  • Tian, Zongzhong
  • Vandehey, Mark
  • Robinson, Bruce W.
  • Kittelson, Wayne
  • Kyte, Michael
  • Troutbeck, Rod
  • Brilon, Werner
  • Wu, Ning

Abstract

Most of the capacity calculation procedures for two-way stop-controlled (TWSC) intersections are based on gap acceptance models. Critical gap is one of the major parameters for gap acceptance models. The accuracy of capacity estimation is mainly determined by the accuracy of the critical gap. This paper focuses on the implementation of the maximum likelihood technique to measure a driver's critical gap using field data. A methodology to define gap events is proposed, so that the accepted gaps and maximum rejected gaps required by the maximum likelihood technique could be obtained. Specific issues regarding multi-lane situations and major street right turn movement are discussed. Special conditions observed during the research are addressed when the proposed method cannot be applied directly, such as the existence of a mid-block refuge area where minor street drivers can seek gaps in a two-stage process, pedestrian blockage, and downstream queue spill back. The proposed method was adopted in measuring critical gap under US conditions during a research project, described by Kyte et al. (1996). ©

Suggested Citation

  • Tian, Zongzhong & Vandehey, Mark & Robinson, Bruce W. & Kittelson, Wayne & Kyte, Michael & Troutbeck, Rod & Brilon, Werner & Wu, Ning, 1999. "Implementing the maximum likelihood methodology to measure a driver's critical gap," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 33(3-4), pages 187-197, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:33:y:1999:i:3-4:p:187-197
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965-8564(98)00044-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hainen, Alex, 2016. "Investigating Mixed Logit Analysis of Critical Headways at a Single-Lane Instrumented Roundabout," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 55(3), December.
    2. Tanyel, Serhan & Yayla, Nadir, 2003. "A discussion on the parameters of Cowan M3 distribution for Turkey," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 129-143, February.
    3. Arshad Jamal & Muhammad Ijaz & Meshal Almosageah & Hassan M. Al-Ahmadi & Muhammad Zahid & Irfan Ullah & Rabia Emhamed Al Mamlook, 2022. "Implementing the Maximum Likelihood Method for Critical Gap Estimation under Heterogeneous Traffic Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Tanackov, Ilija & Deretić, Nemanja & Bogdanović, Vuk & Ruškić, Nenad & Jović, Srđan, 2018. "Safety time in critical gap of left turn manoeuvre from priority approach at TWSC unsignalized intersections," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 505(C), pages 1196-1211.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:33:y:1999:i:3-4:p:187-197. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.