IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v188y2024ics0965856424002441.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Government policies on port resilience amid strike events—A two-stage Van Damme based tripartite evolutionary game

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao, Chuan
  • Peng, Lin
  • Dong, Kangyin
  • Yang, Haoxiong

Abstract

In contrast to natural phenomena, such as extreme weather, accidents, disasters, and public health emergencies, labor strikes are human-induced emergent circumstances arising from low real wages in most cases. During disputes with ports, the labor typically exerts control over the duration and scale of strikes to negotiate improved benefits, while port authorities may seek collaboration with neighboring ports to enhance resilience and mitigate transportation disruption risks. Should the government participate as a third party in the game as an indirect stakeholder? The government must assess the necessity of engagement in the first stage and select an appropriate strategy in the second. Within the framework of tripartite equilibrium, this study examines the evolutionary paths of stability points, dual-stable states, and unstable states under different government engagement policies, as well as the influence of each factor on the tripartite strategy choice. The results reveal that (1) the right timing and policies for government engagement can mitigate more than half of the damage from the strike to the overall system; (2) port alliances can speed up 50 % of the evolution time of the labor to terminate the strike; (3) the government will play the dominant role when the risk of the strike to labor is increased; and (4) the expected duration of strikes can have an inverted “U”-shaped effect on port strategies but a “U”-shaped effect on government policies. The application of the two-stage evolutionary game model in this study develops an analytical framework that provides better reference for the government’s actual decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao, Chuan & Peng, Lin & Dong, Kangyin & Yang, Haoxiong, 2024. "Government policies on port resilience amid strike events—A two-stage Van Damme based tripartite evolutionary game," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424002441
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2024.104196
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856424002441
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2024.104196?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gary-Bobo, Robert J. & Jaaidane, Touria, 2014. "Strikes and slowdown in a theory of relational contracts," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 89-116.
    2. Reggiani, Aura & Nijkamp, Peter & Lanzi, Diego, 2015. "Transport resilience and vulnerability: The role of connectivity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 4-15.
    3. Mo, Lipo & Cui, Zhaoyu & Jia, Rongwen & Dong, Kangyin & Zhao, Chuan, 2024. "How does autonomous vehicles affect taxi industry? A two-stage Van Damme based tripartite evolutionary game perspective," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Zhao, Jinhua & Wang, Xianjia & Niu, Lei & Ding, Rui & Gu, Cuiling, 2023. "Cooperation in collective risk dilemmas with endogenous heterogeneity: Nash equilibrium and evolutionary dynamics," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 175(P1).
    5. Jasmine Siu Lee Lam & Shiling Su, 2015. "Disruption risks and mitigation strategies: an analysis of Asian ports," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 415-435, July.
    6. Matthew Jarman & Andrzej Nowak & Wojciech Borkowski & David Serfass & Alexander Wong & Robin Vallacher, 2015. "The Critical Few: Anticonformists at the Crossroads of Minority Opinion Survival and Collapse," Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, vol. 18(1), pages 1-6.
    7. Li, Wenjie & Asadabadi, Ali & Miller-Hooks, Elise, 2022. "Enhancing resilience through port coalitions in maritime freight networks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1-23.
    8. Annarelli, Alessandro & Nonino, Fabio, 2016. "Strategic and operational management of organizational resilience: Current state of research and future directions," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1-18.
    9. Sungki Kim & Sanggyun Choi & Chanho Kim, 2021. "The Framework for Measuring Port Resilience in Korean Port Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-20, October.
    10. Zixiang Gong & Nan Liu, 2020. "Mitigative and adaptive investments for natural disasters and labor strikes in a seaport–dry port inland logistics network," Maritime Policy & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 92-108, January.
    11. Guo, Zi-Xuan & He, Jun-Zhou & Li, Qing-Ming & Shi, Lei & Wang, Rui-Wu, 2023. "Asymmetric interaction and diverse forms in public goods production in volunteer dilemma game," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    12. Jasper Verschuur & Raghav Pant & Elco Koks & Jim Hall, 2022. "A systemic risk framework to improve the resilience of port and supply-chain networks to natural hazards," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(3), pages 489-506, September.
    13. Ahmad Makui & Seyed Mohammad Seyedhosseini & Seyed Jafar Sadjadi & Parinaz Esmaeili, 2020. "Analysis of labor strike based on evolutionary game and catastrophe theory," EURO Journal on Decision Processes, Springer;EURO - The Association of European Operational Research Societies, vol. 8(1), pages 79-88, May.
    14. Schepler, Xavier & Balev, Stefan & Michel, Sophie & Sanlaville, Éric, 2017. "Global planning in a multi-terminal and multi-modal maritime container port," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 38-62.
    15. Manhar Dhanak & Scott Parr & Evangelos I Kaisar & Panagiota Goulianou & Hannah Russell & Fanny Kristiansson, 2021. "Resilience assessment tool for port planning," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1126-1143, June.
    16. Zheng, Shiyuan & Chen, Xirong & Dong, Kangyin & Wang, Kun & Fu, Xiaowen, 2022. "Joint investment on resilience of cross-country transport infrastructure," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 406-423.
    17. Zheng, Shiyuan & Fu, Xiaowen & Wang, Kun & Li, Hongchang, 2021. "Seaport adaptation to climate change disasters: Subsidy policy vs. adaptation sharing under minimum requirement," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    18. Hossain, Niamat Ullah Ibne & Nur, Farjana & Hosseini, Seyedmohsen & Jaradat, Raed & Marufuzzaman, Mohammad & Puryear, Stephen M., 2019. "A Bayesian network based approach for modeling and assessing resilience: A case study of a full service deep water port," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 378-396.
    19. Zhao, Chuan & Ma, Xuying & Wang, Kun, 2022. "The electric vehicle promotion in the cold-chain logistics under two-sided support policy: An evolutionary game perspective," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 14-34.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Nanxi & Wu, Min & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2023. "Assessment of port resilience using Bayesian network: A study of strategies to enhance readiness and response capacities," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    2. Xu, Peng-Cheng & Lu, Qing-Chang & Xie, Chi & Cheong, Taesu, 2024. "Modeling the resilience of interdependent networks: The role of function dependency in metro and bus systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    3. Wang, Bi & Chin, Kwai Sang & Su, Qin, 2022. "Prevention and adaptation to diversified risks in the seaport–dry port system under asymmetric risk behaviors: Invest earlier or wait?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 11-36.
    4. Liu, Qing & Yang, Yang & Ng, Adolf K.Y. & Jiang, Changmin, 2023. "An analysis on the resilience of the European port network," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    5. Chen, Hong & Lam, Jasmine Siu Lee & Liu, Nan, 2018. "Strategic investment in enhancing port–hinterland container transportation network resilience: A network game theory approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 83-112.
    6. Wu, Di & Yu, Changqing & Zhao, Yannan & Guo, Jialun, 2024. "Changes in vulnerability of global container shipping networks before and after the COVID-19 pandemic," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Zheng, Shiyuan & Chen, Xirong & Dong, Kangyin & Wang, Kun & Fu, Xiaowen, 2022. "Joint investment on resilience of cross-country transport infrastructure," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 406-423.
    8. Xu, Peng-Cheng & Lu, Qing-Chang & Feng, Tao & Li, Jing & Li, Gen & Xu, Xin, 2024. "Resilience analysis of metro stations integrating infrastructures and passengers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    9. Bi Wang & Kwai Sang Chin & Qin Su, 2022. "Risk management and market structures in seaport–dry port systems," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 24(1), pages 114-137, March.
    10. Sarker, Rumana Islam & Kaplan, Sigal & Mailer, Markus & Timmermans, Harry J.P., 2019. "Applying affective event theory to explain transit users’ reactions to service disruptions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 593-605.
    11. Yao He & Yongchun Yang & Meimei Wang & Xudong Zhang, 2022. "Resilience Analysis of Container Port Shipping Network Structure: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Xueni Gou & Jasmine Siu Lee Lam, 2019. "Risk analysis of marine cargoes and major port disruptions," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 21(4), pages 497-523, December.
    13. Xu, Xiangdong & Qu, Kai & Chen, Anthony & Yang, Chao, 2021. "A new day-to-day dynamic network vulnerability analysis approach with Weibit-based route adjustment process," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    14. Mohammad Mojtahedi & Sidney Newton & Jason Meding, 2017. "Predicting the resilience of transport infrastructure to a natural disaster using Cox’s proportional hazards regression model," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 85(2), pages 1119-1133, January.
    15. Milan Janić, 2018. "Modelling the resilience of rail passenger transport networks affected by large-scale disruptive events: the case of HSR (high speed rail)," Transportation, Springer, vol. 45(4), pages 1101-1137, July.
    16. Edwina E. Pereira & Albert E. Steenge, 2022. "Vulnerability and Resilience in the Caribbean Island States; the Role of Connectivity," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 515-540, September.
    17. Zou, Qiling & Chen, Suren, 2019. "Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    18. Antonio Zavala-Alcívar & María-José Verdecho & Juan-José Alfaro-Saiz, 2020. "A Conceptual Framework to Manage Resilience and Increase Sustainability in the Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-38, August.
    19. Garcia-Perez, Alexeis & Cegarra-Navarro, Juan Gabriel & Sallos, Mark Paul & Martinez-Caro, Eva & Chinnaswamy, Anitha, 2023. "Resilience in healthcare systems: Cyber security and digital transformation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    20. Nadia Preghenella & Cinzia Battistella, 2021. "Exploring business models for sustainability: A bibliographic investigation of the literature and future research directions," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2505-2522, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:188:y:2024:i:c:s0965856424002441. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.