IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v158y2022icp110-126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the generation mechanism of BEV drivers' charging demand: An exploration of the relationship between charging choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yiyuan
  • Luo, Xia
  • Qiu, Yuansen
  • Fu, Yuxue

Abstract

In the context of the rapid popularization of battery electric vehicles (BEV), it has become a key problem to deeply understand the charging demand and reasonably configure charging facilities. Exploring the relationship between trip chaining patterns and charging choice of battery electric vehicle users may aid in understanding the mechanism of charging demand. Based on the recursive simultaneous bivariate probit model, we integrate the impact of BEV users’ risk aversion attitude and develop two causal structures: one is that the charging choice is determined first and influences trip chaining pattern, the other is that trip chaining pattern is determined first and influences charging choice. Next, a stated preference survey is conducted through online platform and field survey, and a total of 494 valid questionnaires are collected. The model results show that the fitting effect of the causal structure model where trip chaining pattern precedes charging choice is better than another causal structure model. Moreover, integrating the influence of risk aversion attitude in the form of latent variable into the RSBP model can significantly improve the fit goodness of the model. These findings will help to further understand the mechanism of charging demand and have some implications on estimating charging demand.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yiyuan & Luo, Xia & Qiu, Yuansen & Fu, Yuxue, 2022. "Understanding the generation mechanism of BEV drivers' charging demand: An exploration of the relationship between charging choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 110-126.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:158:y:2022:i:c:p:110-126
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2022.02.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856422000350
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2022.02.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Md Hadiuzzaman & Nahid Parvez Farazi & Sanjana Hossain & Saurav Barua & Farzana Rahman, 2019. "Structural equation approach to investigate trip-chaining and mode choice relationships in the context of developing countries," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(4), pages 391-415, May.
    2. Soto, Jose J. & Márquez, Luis & Macea, Luis F., 2018. "Accounting for attitudes on parking choice: An integrated choice and latent variable approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 65-77.
    3. Roberto Roca Paz & Silke Uebelmesser, 2021. "Risk attitudes and migration decisions," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(3), pages 649-684, June.
    4. Li, Meng & Jia, Yinghao & Shen, Zuojun & He, Fang, 2017. "Improving the electrification rate of the vehicle miles traveled in Beijing: A data-driven approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 106-120.
    5. Huang, Yuqiao & Gao, Linjie & Ni, Anning & Liu, Xiaoning, 2021. "Analysis of travel mode choice and trip chain pattern relationships based on multi-day GPS data: A case study in Shanghai, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    6. Bhat, Chandra R., 2015. "A new generalized heterogeneous data model (GHDM) to jointly model mixed types of dependent variables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 50-77.
    7. Hensher,David A. & Rose,John M. & Greene,William H., 2015. "Applied Choice Analysis," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107465923.
    8. David Hensher, 2013. "Exploring the relationship between perceived acceptability and referendum voting support for alternative road pricing schemes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 40(5), pages 935-959, September.
    9. Xu, Min & Meng, Qiang & Liu, Kai & Yamamoto, Toshiyuki, 2017. "Joint charging mode and location choice model for battery electric vehicle users," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 68-86.
    10. Cavadas, Joana & Homem de Almeida Correia, Gonçalo & Gouveia, João, 2015. "A MIP model for locating slow-charging stations for electric vehicles in urban areas accounting for driver tours," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 188-201.
    11. Nie, Yu (Marco) & Ghamami, Mehrnaz, 2013. "A corridor-centric approach to planning electric vehicle charging infrastructure," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 172-190.
    12. Ye, Xin & Pendyala, Ram M. & Gottardi, Giovanni, 2007. "An exploration of the relationship between mode choice and complexity of trip chaining patterns," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 96-113, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shen, Zuo-Jun Max & Feng, Bo & Mao, Chao & Ran, Lun, 2019. "Optimization models for electric vehicle service operations: A literature review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 462-477.
    2. Huang, Yuqiao & Gao, Linjie & Ni, Anning & Liu, Xiaoning, 2021. "Analysis of travel mode choice and trip chain pattern relationships based on multi-day GPS data: A case study in Shanghai, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 93(C).
    3. Yuan Yuan & Chunfu Shao & Zhichao Cao & Chaoying Yin, 2023. "The Effect of Travel-Chain Complexity on Public Transport Travel Intention: A Mixed-Selection Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-29, March.
    4. Yıldız, Barış & Olcaytu, Evren & Şen, Ahmet, 2019. "The urban recharging infrastructure design problem with stochastic demands and capacitated charging stations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 22-44.
    5. Yan, Yingying & Zhong, Shiquan & Tian, Junfang & Jia, Ning, 2022. "An empirical study on consumer automobile purchase intentions influenced by the COVID-19 outbreak," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    6. Xu, Min & Meng, Qiang, 2020. "Optimal deployment of charging stations considering path deviation and nonlinear elastic demand," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 120-142.
    7. Davidov, Sreten & Pantoš, Miloš, 2017. "Impact of stochastic driving range on the optimal charging infrastructure expansion planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 603-612.
    8. Masmoudi, Mohamed Amine & Hosny, Manar & Demir, Emrah & Genikomsakis, Konstantinos N. & Cheikhrouhou, Naoufel, 2018. "The dial-a-ride problem with electric vehicles and battery swapping stations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 392-420.
    9. Michael Hardinghaus & Christian Seidel & John E. Anderson, 2019. "Estimating Public Charging Demand of Electric Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-22, October.
    10. Sottile, Eleonora & Tuveri, Giovanni & Piras, Francesco & Meloni, Italo, 2022. "Modelling commuting tours versus non-commuting tours for university students. A panel data analysis from different contexts," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 56-67.
    11. Shaohua Cui & Hui Zhao & Huijie Wen & Cuiping Zhang, 2018. "Locating Multiple Size and Multiple Type of Charging Station for Battery Electricity Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Chengxiang Zhuge & Chunfu Shao, 2018. "Agent-Based Modelling of Locating Public Transport Facilities for Conventional and Electric Vehicles," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 875-908, December.
    13. Lingjuan Chen & Yijing Zhao & Zupeng Liu & Xinran Yang, 2022. "Construction of Commuters’ Multi-Mode Choice Model Based on Public Transport Operation Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Cen, Xuekai & Lo, Hong K. & Li, Lu & Lee, Enoch, 2018. "Modeling electric vehicles adoption for urban commute trips," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 431-454.
    15. Sebastian Astroza & Venu M. Garikapati & Ram M. Pendyala & Chandra R. Bhat & Patricia L. Mokhtarian, 2019. "Representing heterogeneity in structural relationships among multiple choice variables using a latent segmentation approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(5), pages 1755-1784, October.
    16. Rafiq, Rezwana & McNally, Michael G., 2022. "A structural analysis of the work tour behavior of transit commuters," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 61-79.
    17. Kumar, Rajeev Ranjan & Chakraborty, Abhishek & Mandal, Prasenjit, 2021. "Promoting electric vehicle adoption: Who should invest in charging infrastructure?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    18. Akeb, Hakim & Moncef, Btissam & Durand, Bruno, 2018. "Building a collaborative solution in dense urban city settings to enhance parcel delivery: An effective crowd model in Paris," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 223-233.
    19. Canessa, Carolin & Venus, Terese E. & Wiesmeier, Miriam & Mennig, Philipp & Sauer, Johannes, 2023. "Incentives, Rewards or Both in Payments for Ecosystem Services: Drawing a Link Between Farmers' Preferences and Biodiversity Levels," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    20. Sant'Anna, Ana Claudia & Bergtold, Jason & Shanoyan, Aleksan & Caldas, Marcellus & Granco, Gabriel, 2021. "Deal or No Deal? Analysis of Bioenergy Feedstock Contract Choice with Multiple Opt-out Options and Contract Attribute Substitutability," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315289, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:158:y:2022:i:c:p:110-126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.