IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v114y2018ipbp354-363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Trading off costs, environmental impact, and levels of service in the optimal design of transit bus fleets

Author

Listed:
  • Durango-Cohen, Pablo L.
  • McKenzie, Elaine C.

Abstract

The development of a systematic framework to support the design of transit bus fleets is justified by the significant and long-lasting implications associated with decisions to purchase transit vehicles, as well as by developments in fuel propulsion and battery technologies over the last 2 decades that have increased the options available to transit operators, and, in turn, the complexity of assessing the corresponding tradeoffs. The need to evaluate these tradeoffs is, in part, driven by the emergence of environmental impact mitigation, i.e., emissions reductions, as a critical concern of transit operators and governments around the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Durango-Cohen, Pablo L. & McKenzie, Elaine C., 2018. "Trading off costs, environmental impact, and levels of service in the optimal design of transit bus fleets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 354-363.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:114:y:2018:i:pb:p:354-363
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.030
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856417309771
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2018.01.030?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ezra Hauer, 1971. "Fleet Selection for Public Transportation Routes," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 5(1), pages 1-21, February.
    2. Steven T. Hackman & Robert C. Leachman, 1989. "A General Framework for Modeling Production," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 478-495, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Craig A. Tovey, 2002. "Tutorial on Computational Complexity," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 30-61, June.
    2. Cherchye, Laurens & De Rock, Bram & Kerstens, Pieter Jan, 2018. "Production with storable and durable inputs: Nonparametric analysis of intertemporal efficiency," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 270(2), pages 498-513.
    3. Kefeli, Ali & Uzsoy, Reha & Fathi, Yahya & Kay, Michael, 2011. "Using a mathematical programming model to examine the marginal price of capacitated resources," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 383-391, May.
    4. Phillip O. Kriett & Sebastian Eirich & Martin Grunow, 2017. "Cycle time-oriented mid-term production planning for semiconductor wafer fabrication," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(16), pages 4662-4679, August.
    5. Pecchioli, Bruno & Moroz, David, 2023. "Do geographical appellations provide useful quality signals? The case of Scotch single malt whiskies," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    6. Chatterjee A K & Mukherjee, Saral, 2006. "Unified Concept of Bottleneck," IIMA Working Papers WP2006-05-01, Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad, Research and Publication Department.
    7. Julia Pahl & Stefan Voß & David Woodruff, 2007. "Production planning with load dependent lead times: an update of research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 297-345, September.
    8. O'Hara, Sabine U., 1997. "Toward a sustaining production theory," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 141-154, February.
    9. Gopalswamy, Karthick & Uzsoy, Reha, 2021. "Conic programming models for production planning with clearing functions: Formulations and duality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 292(3), pages 953-966.
    10. Missbauer, Hubert, 2011. "Order release planning with clearing functions: A queueing-theoretical analysis of the clearing function concept," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(1), pages 399-406, May.
    11. Haeussler, S. & Stampfer, C. & Missbauer, H., 2020. "Comparison of two optimization based order release models with fixed and variable lead times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    12. Ghadimi, Foad & Aouam, Tarik & Haeussler, Stefan & Uzsoy, Reha, 2022. "Integrated and hierarchical systems for coordinating order acceptance and release planning," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(3), pages 1277-1289.
    13. Tirachini, Alejandro, 2014. "The economics and engineering of bus stops: Spacing, design and congestion," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 37-57.
    14. Leachman, Robert C. & Johnston, Lenrick & Li, Shan & Shen, Zuo-Jun, 2014. "An automated planning engine for biopharmaceutical production," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 238(1), pages 327-338.
    15. Pürgstaller, Peter & Missbauer, Hubert, 2012. "Rule-based vs. optimisation-based order release in workload control: A simulation study of a MTO manufacturer," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(2), pages 670-680.
    16. Jakob Asmundsson & Ronald L. Rardin & Can Hulusi Turkseven & Reha Uzsoy, 2009. "Production planning with resources subject to congestion," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(2), pages 142-157, March.
    17. Dubaniowski, Mateusz Iwo & Heinimann, Hans Rudolf, 2020. "A framework for modeling interdependencies among households, businesses, and infrastructure systems; and their response to disruptions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:114:y:2018:i:pb:p:354-363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.