IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v140y2021icp32-43.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The effect of consanguinity on coalescence times on the X chromosome

Author

Listed:
  • Cotter, Daniel J.
  • Severson, Alissa L.
  • Rosenberg, Noah A.

Abstract

Consanguineous unions increase the frequency at which identical genomic segments are inherited along separate paths of descent, decreasing coalescence times for pairs of alleles drawn from an individual who is the offspring of a consanguineous pair. For an autosomal locus, it has recently been shown that the mean time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) for two alleles in the same individual and the mean TMRCA for two alleles in two separate individuals both decrease with increasing consanguinity in a population. Here, we extend this analysis to the X chromosome, considering X-chromosomal coalescence times under a coalescent model with diploid, male–female mating pairs. We examine four possible first-cousin mating schemes that are equivalent in their effects on autosomes, but that have differing effects on the X chromosome: patrilateral-parallel, patrilateral-cross, matrilateral-parallel, and matrilateral-cross. In each mating model, we calculate mean TMRCA for X-chromosomal alleles sampled either within or between individuals. We describe a consanguinity effect on X-chromosomal TMRCA that differs from the autosomal pattern under matrilateral but not under patrilateral first-cousin mating. For matrilateral first cousins, the effect of consanguinity in reducing TMRCA is stronger on the X chromosome than on the autosomes, with an increased effect of parallel-cousin mating compared to cross-cousin mating. The theoretical computations support the utility of the model in understanding patterns of genomic sharing on the X chromosome.

Suggested Citation

  • Cotter, Daniel J. & Severson, Alissa L. & Rosenberg, Noah A., 2021. "The effect of consanguinity on coalescence times on the X chromosome," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 32-43.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:140:y:2021:i:c:p:32-43
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2021.03.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580921000290
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2021.03.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Severson, Alissa L. & Carmi, Shai & Rosenberg, Noah A., 2021. "Variance and limiting distribution of coalescence times in a diploid model of a consanguineous population," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 50-65.
    2. Ramachandran, Sohini & Rosenberg, Noah A. & Feldman, Marcus W. & Wakeley, John, 2008. "Population differentiation and migration: Coalescence times in a two-sex island model for autosomal and X-linked loci," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 74(4), pages 291-301.
    3. Carmi, Shai & Wilton, Peter R. & Wakeley, John & Pe’er, Itsik, 2014. "A renewal theory approach to IBD sharing," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 35-48.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cotter, Daniel J. & Severson, Alissa L. & Carmi, Shai & Rosenberg, Noah A., 2022. "Limiting distribution of X-chromosomal coalescence times under first-cousin consanguineous mating," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-15.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cotter, Daniel J. & Severson, Alissa L. & Carmi, Shai & Rosenberg, Noah A., 2022. "Limiting distribution of X-chromosomal coalescence times under first-cousin consanguineous mating," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Severson, Alissa L. & Carmi, Shai & Rosenberg, Noah A., 2021. "Variance and limiting distribution of coalescence times in a diploid model of a consanguineous population," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 50-65.
    3. Hobolth, Asger & Rivas-González, Iker & Bladt, Mogens & Futschik, Andreas, 2024. "Phase-type distributions in mathematical population genetics: An emerging framework," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 14-32.
    4. Kerdoncuff, Elise & Lambert, Amaury & Achaz, Guillaume, 2020. "Testing for population decline using maximal linkage disequilibrium blocks," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 171-181.
    5. Mendez, Fernando L., 2017. "Differences in the effective population sizes of males and females do not require differences in their distribution of offspring number," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 19-28.
    6. Van Cleve, Jeremy, 2015. "Social evolution and genetic interactions in the short and long term," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 2-26.
    7. Johndrow, James E. & Palacios, Julia A., 2019. "Exact limits of inference in coalescent models," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 75-93.
    8. Deng, Yun & Song, Yun S. & Nielsen, Rasmus, 2021. "The distribution of waiting distances in ancestral recombination graphs," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 34-43.
    9. Elena Arciero & Sufyan A. Dogra & Daniel S. Malawsky & Massimo Mezzavilla & Theofanis Tsismentzoglou & Qin Qin Huang & Karen A. Hunt & Dan Mason & Saghira Malik Sharif & David A. Heel & Eamonn Sherida, 2021. "Fine-scale population structure and demographic history of British Pakistanis," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:140:y:2021:i:c:p:32-43. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.