IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/thpobi/v100y2015icp56-62.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Likelihood-based tree reconstruction on a concatenation of aligned sequence data sets can be statistically inconsistent

Author

Listed:
  • Roch, Sebastien
  • Steel, Mike

Abstract

The reconstruction of a species tree from genomic data faces a double hurdle. First, the (gene) tree describing the evolution of each gene may differ from the species tree, for instance, due to incomplete lineage sorting. Second, the aligned genetic sequences at the leaves of each gene tree provide merely an imperfect estimate of the topology of the gene tree. In this note, we demonstrate formally that a basic statistical problem arises if one tries to avoid accounting for these two processes and analyses the genetic data directly via a concatenation approach. More precisely, we show that, under the multispecies coalescent with a standard site substitution model, maximum likelihood estimation on sequence data that has been concatenated across genes and performed under the incorrect assumption that all sites have evolved independently and identically on a fixed tree is a statistically inconsistent estimator of the species tree. Our results provide a formal justification of simulation results described of Kubatko and Degnan (2007) and others, and complements recent theoretical results by DeGIorgio and Degnan (2010) and Chifman and Kubtako (2014).

Suggested Citation

  • Roch, Sebastien & Steel, Mike, 2015. "Likelihood-based tree reconstruction on a concatenation of aligned sequence data sets can be statistically inconsistent," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 56-62.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:100:y:2015:i:c:p:56-62
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tpb.2014.12.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040580914001075
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tpb.2014.12.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antonis Rokas & Barry L. Williams & Nicole King & Sean B. Carroll, 2003. "Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies," Nature, Nature, vol. 425(6960), pages 798-804, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nazifa Ahmed Moumi & Badhan Das & Zarin Tasnim Promi & Nishat Anjum Bristy & Md Shamsuzzoha Bayzid, 2019. "Quartet-based inference of cell differentiation trees from ChIP-Seq histone modification data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(9), pages 1-25, September.
    2. Ruriko Yoshida & Kenji Fukumizu & Chrysafis Vogiatzis, 2019. "Multilocus phylogenetic analysis with gene tree clustering," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 276(1), pages 293-313, May.
    3. Degnan, James H. & Rhodes, John A., 2015. "There are no caterpillars in a wicked forest," Theoretical Population Biology, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 17-23.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang Yuancheng & Degnan James H, 2011. "Performance of Matrix Representation with Parsimony for Inferring Species from Gene Trees," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-39, May.
    2. Martín Espariz & Federico A Zuljan & Luis Esteban & Christian Magni, 2016. "Taxonomic Identity Resolution of Highly Phylogenetically Related Strains and Selection of Phylogenetic Markers by Using Genome-Scale Methods: The Bacillus pumilus Group Case," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(9), pages 1-17, September.
    3. Rahul Siddharthan & Eric D Siggia & Erik van Nimwegen, 2005. "PhyloGibbs: A Gibbs Sampling Motif Finder That Incorporates Phylogeny," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 1(7), pages 1-23, December.
    4. David Peris & Emily J. Ubbelohde & Meihua Christina Kuang & Jacek Kominek & Quinn K. Langdon & Marie Adams & Justin A. Koshalek & Amanda Beth Hulfachor & Dana A. Opulente & David J. Hall & Katie Hyma , 2023. "Macroevolutionary diversity of traits and genomes in the model yeast genus Saccharomyces," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-19, December.
    5. Haque Md Rejuan & Kubatko Laura, 2024. "A global test of hybrid ancestry from genome-scale data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Alexei J Drummond & Simon Y W Ho & Matthew J Phillips & Andrew Rambaut, 2006. "Relaxed Phylogenetics and Dating with Confidence," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 4(5), pages 1-1, March.
    7. Sergio Consoli & Jan Korst & Steffen Pauws & Gijs Geleijnse, 2020. "Improved metaheuristics for the quartet method of hierarchical clustering," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 78(2), pages 241-270, October.
    8. Siewert Elizabeth A & Kechris Katerina J, 2009. "Prediction of Motifs Based on a Repeated-Measures Model for Integrating Cross-Species Sequence and Expression Data," Statistical Applications in Genetics and Molecular Biology, De Gruyter, vol. 8(1), pages 1-36, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:thpobi:v:100:y:2015:i:c:p:56-62. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.