IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/telpol/v44y2020i9s0308596120301038.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The evolving 5G case study in United States unilateral spectrum planning and policy

Author

Listed:
  • Frieden, Rob

Abstract

This paper tracks increasingly aggressive initiatives by the United States government to reallocate spectrum on an expedited and unilateral basis well before conclusion of inter-governmental coordination. Rather than embrace the customary commitment to achieve consensus on global spectrum allocations at the International Telecommunication Union (“ITU”), the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) has auctioned off large blocks of frequencies for the next generation (“5G”) of wireless services.

Suggested Citation

  • Frieden, Rob, 2020. "The evolving 5G case study in United States unilateral spectrum planning and policy," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 44(9).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:44:y:2020:i:9:s0308596120301038
    DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308596120301038
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.telpol.2020.102011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Drake, William J., 1988. "Restructuring the international telecommunication regulations," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 12(3), pages 217-233, September.
    2. Rutkowski, Anthony M., 1991. "The ITU at the cusp of change," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 286-297, August.
    3. Anonymous, 1952. "International Telecommunication Union," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(3), pages 448-449, August.
    4. Anonymous, 1952. "International Telecommunication Union," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 6(4), pages 646-647, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Webb, William & Medeisis, Arturas & Minervini, Leo Fulvio, 2024. "Evolved spectrum usage rights: A catalyst for liberal spectrum management reform," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(3).
    2. Lee, Chuan-Kai & Yu, Limeng, 2022. "A multi-level perspective on 5G transition: The China case," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Douglas A. Galbi, 2003. "Revolutionary Ideas for Radio Regulation," Law and Economics 0304001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    2. Peter ANKER & Wolter LEMSTRA, 2013. "Cognitive Radio: How to Proceed? An Actor-Centric Approach," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(90), pages 77-95, 2nd quart.
    3. Larry Willmore, 2004. "Government Policies toward Information and Communication," Economic History 0412001, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    4. Anker, Peter, 2017. "From spectrum management to spectrum governance," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 486-497.
    5. Frieden, Rob, 2021. "Win, Lose and Draw: Outcomes from the 2019 World Radio Conference," 23rd ITS Biennial Conference, Online Conference / Gothenburg 2021. Digital societies and industrial transformations: Policies, markets, and technologies in a post-Covid world 238022, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    6. Genschel, Philipp & Werle, Raymund, 1992. "From National Hierarchies to International Standardization: Historical and Modal Changes in the Coordination of Telecommunications," MPIfG Discussion Paper 92/1, Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:telpol:v:44:y:2020:i:9:s0308596120301038. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30471/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.