IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v78y2024ics0160791x24001453.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustaining local opposition to Big Science: A case study of the Thirty Meter Telescope controversy

Author

Listed:
  • Rüland, Anna-Lena

Abstract

Big Science projects, which are extremely costly and typically revolve around large and complex instruments, are increasingly common in research. Proponents often frame Big Science as a “win-win” for all stakeholders, including for local communities. Yet local opposition to Big Science projects is common, although it is often either short-lived or fails to raise wider awareness. The story is different for the kiaʻi mauna (protectors of the mountain), a group largely composed of Native Hawaiians. This group has sustained opposition to the Thirty Meter Telescope (TMT) on Mauna Kea, Hawaiʻi Island, since 2011 and has raised widespread attention for its advocacy. Combining social movement theory and the concept of place attachment, I investigate why the kiaʻi have been able to sustain such momentum. Based on 16 interviews that I conducted with Native Hawaiians, local community members, policymakers, and astronomers, I argue that six factors have been decisive for the resilience of opposition: multi-generational leaderful organization, grassroots resources, versatile tactics, anti-science counterframing, local and national political opportunity, as well as place attachment-driven commitment.

Suggested Citation

  • Rüland, Anna-Lena, 2024. "Sustaining local opposition to Big Science: A case study of the Thirty Meter Telescope controversy," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24001453
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102597
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24001453
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102597?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. van der Horst, Dan, 2007. "NIMBY or not? Exploring the relevance of location and the politics of voiced opinions in renewable energy siting controversies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2705-2714, May.
    2. Jack S. Levy, 2008. "Case Studies: Types, Designs, and Logics of Inference," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 25(1), pages 1-18, February.
    3. Doreen Atkinson, 2019. "When Stars Collide: Competing Development Paradigms in the Central Karoo," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 689-709, July.
    4. Daniel Adams† & Adrian Tiplady & Frédéric Sgard, 2023. "Integration of socio-economic impact into the development of the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) in South Africa," OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2023/07, OECD Publishing.
    5. Benjamin K. Sovacool, 2009. "Exploring and Contextualizing Public Opposition to Renewable Electricity in the United States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-20, September.
    6. Wilhelm Agrell, 2012. "Framing prospects and risk in the public promotion of ESS Scandinavia," Science and Public Policy, Oxford University Press, vol. 39(4), pages 429-438, July.
    7. Hackett, Edward J. & Conz, David & Parker, John & Bashford, Jonathon & DeLay, Susan, 2004. "Tokamaks and turbulence: research ensembles, policy and technoscientific work," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(5), pages 747-767, July.
    8. Melissa Teo & Martin Loosemore, 2011. "Community-based protest against construction projects: a case study of movement continuity," Construction Management and Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(2), pages 131-144.
    9. Michael Gastrow & Thelma Oppelt, 2019. "The Square Kilometre Array and Local Development Mandates in the Karoo," Journal of Southern African Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(4), pages 711-728, July.
    10. Rosie Alegado, 2019. "Opponents of the Thirty Meter Telescope fight the process, not science," Nature, Nature, vol. 572(7767), pages 7-7, August.
    11. Cherryl Walker & Davide Chinigò, 2018. "Disassembling the Square Kilometre Array: astronomy and development in South Africa," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(10), pages 1979-1997, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carlisle, Juliet E. & Kane, Stephanie L. & Solan, David & Bowman, Madelaine & Joe, Jeffrey C., 2015. "Public attitudes regarding large-scale solar energy development in the U.S," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 835-847.
    2. Moragues-Faus, Ana M. & Ortiz-Miranda, Dionisio, 2010. "Local mobilisation against windfarm developments in Spanish rural areas: New actors in the regulation arena," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4232-4240, August.
    3. Arman Avadikyan & Gilles Lambert & Christophe Lerch, 2016. "A Multi-Level Perspective on Ambidexterity: The Case of a Synchrotron Research Facility," Working Papers of BETA 2016-44, Bureau d'Economie Théorique et Appliquée, UDS, Strasbourg.
    4. Ioannidis, Romanos & Koutsoyiannis, Demetris, 2020. "A review of land use, visibility and public perception of renewable energy in the context of landscape impact," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    5. Lai, N.Y.G. & Yap, E.H. & Lee, C.W., 2011. "Viability of CCS: A broad-based assessment for Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(8), pages 3608-3616.
    6. Klaus H. Goetz & Ronny Patz & Theresa Squatrito, 2017. "Resourcing Global Justice: The Resource Management Design of International Courts," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 8, pages 62-74, August.
    7. Sunak, Yasin & Madlener, Reinhard, 2012. "The Impact of Wind Farms on Property Values: A Geographically Weighted Hedonic Pricing Model," FCN Working Papers 3/2012, E.ON Energy Research Center, Future Energy Consumer Needs and Behavior (FCN), revised Mar 2013.
    8. Faulques, Martin & Bonnet, Jean & Bourdin, Sébastien & Juge, Marine & Pigeon, Jonas & Richard, Charlotte, 2022. "Generational effect and territorial distributive justice, the two main drivers for willingness to pay for renewable energies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    9. O. Fiona Yap, 2020. "A New Normal or Business-as-Usual? Lessons for COVID-19 from Financial Crises in East and Southeast Asia," The European Journal of Development Research, Palgrave Macmillan;European Association of Development Research and Training Institutes (EADI), vol. 32(5), pages 1504-1534, December.
    10. Lisa Kastner, 2017. "Tracing policy influence of diffuse interests: The post-crisis consumer finance protection politics in the US," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-02186320, HAL.
    11. Patrick S. Roberts & Jon Schmid, 2022. "Government‐led innovation acceleration: Case studies of US federal government innovation and technology acceleration organizations," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 39(3), pages 353-378, May.
    12. Sward, Jeffrey A. & Nilson, Roberta S. & Katkar, Venktesh V. & Stedman, Richard C. & Kay, David L. & Ifft, Jennifer E. & Zhang, K. Max, 2021. "Integrating social considerations in multicriteria decision analysis for utility-scale solar photovoltaic siting," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    13. Peura, Pekka, 2013. "From Malthus to sustainable energy—Theoretical orientations to reforming the energy sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 19(C), pages 309-327.
    14. Baxter, Jamie & Morzaria, Rakhee & Hirsch, Rachel, 2013. "A case-control study of support/opposition to wind turbines: Perceptions of health risk, economic benefits, and community conflict," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 931-943.
    15. Iliana Olivié & Aitor Pérez, 2016. "Why don’t donor countries coordinate their aid? A case study of European donors in Morocco," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 16(1), pages 52-64, January.
    16. Sebastian Schär & Jutta Geldermann, 2021. "Adopting Multiactor Multicriteria Analysis for the Evaluation of Energy Scenarios," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-19, March.
    17. Copena, Damián & Simón, Xavier, 2018. "Wind farms and payments to landowners: Opportunities for rural development for the case of Galicia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 38-47.
    18. Haggett, Claire, 2011. "Understanding public responses to offshore wind power," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 39(2), pages 503-510, February.
    19. Lars Mewes & Leonie Tuitjer & Peter Dirksmeier, 2024. "Exploring the variances of climate change opinions in Germany at a fine-grained local scale," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    20. Lisa Kastner, 2016. "The Power of Weak Interests in Financial Reforms," SciencePo Working papers Main hal-02187883, HAL.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:78:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x24001453. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.