IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v76y2024ics0160791x23002385.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An examination of sUAS operations in proximity to a major U.S. Airport

Author

Listed:
  • Wallace, Ryan J.
  • Winter, Scott R.
  • Rice, Stephen
  • Loffi, Jon M.
  • Misra, Shlok
  • Lee, Sang-A
  • Park, Joshua
  • Neff, Abigail
  • McNall, Cole

Abstract

The use of small, Unmanned Aircraft Systems (sUAS) has proliferated in the past several years. While operators are supposed to avoid operations in the immediate vicinity of airports, there are sometimes violations. In extreme cases, these violations can result in the complete grounding of flights at major airports around the world. These disruptions can lead to thousands of flights canceled and hundreds of thousands of passengers displaced. A compounding problem is the lack of empirical data to understand the amount of, and types of, sUAS operations around major airports. The purpose of this study was to assess the characteristics of sUAS operations near the Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport (DFW) by objectively analyzing data collected over a 36-month timeframe. The findings provide empirical data on the types of sUAS operations around DFW, yearly variance in operations, levels of UAS facility map compliance, types and times of sUAS flown, and sUAS launching points. The data indicates a growing trend in operations between 2018 and 2020, with a possible plateau in 2021 and beyond. sUAS operations in the airport vicinity are high, with approximately 70 % operating in the 400-foot grid levels or at points farther away from critical airport operations. Flights appear to follow seasonality and daily operation patterns, and growth seems to be in smaller vehicles with weights less than 250 g. In addition to the results, the authors discuss practical implications for National Airspace System (NAS) safety and the implications of integrating new operations into communities, such as drone deliveries and Advanced Air Mobility operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Wallace, Ryan J. & Winter, Scott R. & Rice, Stephen & Loffi, Jon M. & Misra, Shlok & Lee, Sang-A & Park, Joshua & Neff, Abigail & McNall, Cole, 2024. "An examination of sUAS operations in proximity to a major U.S. Airport," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x23002385
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102433
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X23002385
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102433?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sichko, Paul, 2019. "Integrating unmanned aerial system operations into the Dallas/Fort Worth airport environment," Journal of Airport Management, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 13(3), pages 206-214, June.
    2. Jane Fox, Sarah, 2022. "Drones: Foreseeing a 'risky' business?Policing the challenge that flies above," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 71(C).
    3. Wang, Ning & Mutzner, Nico & Blanchet, Karl, 2023. "Societal acceptance of urban drones: A scoping literature review," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    4. Fox, Sarah Jane, 2020. "The ‘risk’ of disruptive technology today (A case study of aviation – Enter the drone)," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ahn, Sang-Jin & Yoon, Ho Young & Lee, Young-Joo, 2021. "Text mining as a tool for real-time technology assessment: Application to the cross-national comparative study on artificial organ technology," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    2. Frederiksen, Marianne Harbo & Wolf, Patricia & Klotz, Ute, 2024. "Citizen visions of drone uses and impacts in 2057: Far-future insights for policy decision-makers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:76:y:2024:i:c:s0160791x23002385. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.