IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v52y2018icp60-69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The requirement of accessibility: European automated border control systems for persons with disabilities

Author

Listed:
  • Oostveen, Anne-Marie
  • Lehtonen, Pinja

Abstract

This exploratory study investigates whether automated border control systems should be provided for persons with disabilities at European airports. While the special assistance provided to disabled passengers has improved in the last decade, some may want to travel independently using automated gates. This is currently not possible, nor is there an explicit plan to include the accessibility requirement in future technology development. We reflect this questionable situation against the notion of the good society and consider airports as normatively laden socio-physical zones contributing to experiences of exclusion. Our research stresses the need to consider human abilities as a spectrum, which should be addressed with the use of universal design principles to benefit as many travelers as possible. Interviews and a survey of disabled passengers help us explore the views of stakeholders; to find out whether persons with disabilities wish to use automated systems instead of assistance services, and whether stakeholders consider accessible systems technologically possible, cost-effective, and recommendable.

Suggested Citation

  • Oostveen, Anne-Marie & Lehtonen, Pinja, 2018. "The requirement of accessibility: European automated border control systems for persons with disabilities," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 60-69.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:52:y:2018:i:c:p:60-69
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.07.009
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X17300878
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.07.009?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Brey, Philip, 2018. "The strategic role of technology in a good society," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 39-45.
    2. Dotson, Taylor, 2012. "Technology, choice and the good life: Questioning technological liberalism," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 326-336.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Huang, Chun-Yao & Wu, Chang-Kang & Liu, Ping-Yu, 2022. "Assistive technology in smart cities: A case of street crossing for the visually-impaired," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ravanbakhsh, Rostam & Taqavi, Mostafa, 2020. "Muslim scholars and technological volition," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    2. Epting, Shane, 2021. "Vulnerable groups, virtual cities, and social isolation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Sadowski, Jathan & Selinger, Evan, 2014. "Creating a taxonomic tool for technocracy and applying it to Silicon Valley," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 161-168.
    4. Marinho, Marcelo & Amorim, Luís & Camara, Rafael & Oliveira, Brigitte Renata & Sobral, Marcos & Sampaio, Suzana, 2021. "Happier and further by going together: The importance of software team behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2019. "When nudge comes to shove: Liberty and nudging in the era of big data," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    6. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2020. "Privacy as an aggregate public good," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Reimers, Hanna, 2022. "Carbon footprint tracking apps. What drives consumers' adoption intention?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    8. Hyunjae Daniel Shin & Richard Bull, 2019. "Three Dimensions of Design for Sustainable Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    9. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2023. "Generative AI: Here to stay, but for good?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    10. Melović, Boban & Jocović, Mijat & Dabić, Marina & Vulić, Tamara Backović & Dudic, Branislav, 2020. "The impact of digital transformation and digital marketing on the brand promotion, positioning and electronic business in Montenegro," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    11. Chege, Samwel Macharia & Wang, Daoping & Suntu, Shaldon Leparan & Bishoge, Obadia Kyetuza, 2019. "Influence of technology transfer on performance and sustainability of standard gauge railway in developing countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 79-92.
    12. Zahid, Muhammad & Rahman, Haseeb Ur & Ullah, Zabeeh & Muhammad, Ali, 2021. "Sustainability and branchless banking: The development and validation of a distinct measurement scale," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    13. Moreno-Llamas, Antonio & García-Mayor, Jesús & De la Cruz-Sánchez, Ernesto, 2020. "The impact of digital technology development on sitting time across Europe," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Sanchis, Raúl G., 2023. "Towards a general equilibrium theory of allocation of time for the digital revolution era," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    15. Ponce, Pedro & Peffer, Therese & Molina, Arturo & Barcena, Sergio, 2020. "Social creation networks for designing low income interfaces in programmable thermostats," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    16. Hudson, Marc, 2018. "Ending technocracy with a neologism? Avivocracy as a conceptual tool," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 136-139.
    17. Kheirandish, Shadi & Funk, Mathias & Wensveen, Stephan & Verkerk, Maarten & Rauterberg, Matthias, 2020. "A comprehensive value framework for design," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    18. Irwansyah,, 2020. "The social contractual utilitarianism of a digital village in rural Indonesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    19. Nelson, Jake & Gorichanaz, Tim, 2019. "Trust as an ethical value in emerging technology governance: The case of drone regulation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    20. Pütz, Fabian & Murphy, Finbarr & Mullins, Martin & O'Malley, Lisa, 2019. "Connected automated vehicles and insurance: Analysing future market-structure from a business ecosystem perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:52:y:2018:i:c:p:60-69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.