IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/envval/v33y2024i4p414-433.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Who owns NATURE? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies

Author

Listed:
  • Jeroen K.G. Hopster

    (Utrecht University, The Netherlands)

  • Alessio Gerola
  • Ben Hofbauer

    (Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands)

  • Guido Löhr

    (Free University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands)

  • Julia Rijssenbeek

    (Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands)

  • Paulan Korenhof

    (Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands)

Abstract

Emerging technologies can have profound conceptual implications. Their emergence frequently calls for the articulation of new concepts, or for modifications and novel applications of concepts that are already entrenched in communication and thought. In this paper, we introduce the notion of “conceptual appropriation†to capture the dynamics between concepts and emerging technologies. By conceptual appropriation, we mean the novel application of a value-laden concept to lay a contestable claim on an underdetermined phenomenon. We illustrate the dynamics of conceptual appropriation by analyzing the concept NATURE and its uptake in three discourses of emerging technology: cellular agriculture, solar geo-engineering, and biomimicry. We argue that NATURE and its cognate NATURALNESS are strongly valanced concepts upon which different stakeholders lay a claim. In doing so, stakeholders advance distinct conceptions of nature, typically to suit their own interests. Our case-studies illustrate how in discourses on emerging technology, the application of value-concepts is entangled with ideological stakes and power dynamics.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeroen K.G. Hopster & Alessio Gerola & Ben Hofbauer & Guido Löhr & Julia Rijssenbeek & Paulan Korenhof, 2024. "Who owns NATURE? Conceptual appropriation in discourses on climate and biotechnologies," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(4), pages 414-433, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:414-433
    DOI: 10.1177/09632719231196535
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09632719231196535
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09632719231196535?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Neil F Doherty & Crispin R Coombs & John Loan-Clarke, 2006. "A re-conceptualization of the interpretive flexibility of information technologies: redressing the balance between the social and the technical," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(6), pages 569-582, December.
    2. Brey, Philip, 2018. "The strategic role of technology in a good society," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 39-45.
    3. Gisle Andersen & Kjersti Fløttum & Guillaume Carbou & Anje Müller Gjesdal, 2022. "People's Conceptions and Valuations of Nature in the Context of Climate Change," Environmental Values, , vol. 31(4), pages 397-420, August.
    4. Rob Bellamy & Shannon Osaka, 2020. "Unnatural climate solutions?," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 10(2), pages 98-99, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Iana Nesterova, 2024. "Gentleness and care," Environmental Values, , vol. 33(4), pages 357-362, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Epting, Shane, 2021. "Vulnerable groups, virtual cities, and social isolation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    2. Marinho, Marcelo & Amorim, Luís & Camara, Rafael & Oliveira, Brigitte Renata & Sobral, Marcos & Sampaio, Suzana, 2021. "Happier and further by going together: The importance of software team behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    3. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2020. "Privacy as an aggregate public good," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    4. Hoffmann, Stefan & Lasarov, Wassili & Reimers, Hanna, 2022. "Carbon footprint tracking apps. What drives consumers' adoption intention?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    5. Hyunjae Daniel Shin & Richard Bull, 2019. "Three Dimensions of Design for Sustainable Behaviour," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Gordon, Joel A. & Balta-Ozkan, Nazmiye & Nabavi, Seyed Ali, 2023. "Socio-technical barriers to domestic hydrogen futures: Repurposing pipelines, policies, and public perceptions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 336(C).
    7. Sætra, Henrik Skaug, 2023. "Generative AI: Here to stay, but for good?," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    8. Melović, Boban & Jocović, Mijat & Dabić, Marina & Vulić, Tamara Backović & Dudic, Branislav, 2020. "The impact of digital transformation and digital marketing on the brand promotion, positioning and electronic business in Montenegro," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    9. Chege, Samwel Macharia & Wang, Daoping & Suntu, Shaldon Leparan & Bishoge, Obadia Kyetuza, 2019. "Influence of technology transfer on performance and sustainability of standard gauge railway in developing countries," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 79-92.
    10. Zahid, Muhammad & Rahman, Haseeb Ur & Ullah, Zabeeh & Muhammad, Ali, 2021. "Sustainability and branchless banking: The development and validation of a distinct measurement scale," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    11. Moreno-Llamas, Antonio & García-Mayor, Jesús & De la Cruz-Sánchez, Ernesto, 2020. "The impact of digital technology development on sitting time across Europe," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    12. Sanchis, Raúl G., 2023. "Towards a general equilibrium theory of allocation of time for the digital revolution era," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    13. Ponce, Pedro & Peffer, Therese & Molina, Arturo & Barcena, Sergio, 2020. "Social creation networks for designing low income interfaces in programmable thermostats," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    14. Kuhn, Annegret & Merk, Christine & Wunsch, Andrea, 2024. "Carbon dioxide removal through ecosystem restoration: Public perceptions and political participation," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 306554, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    15. Zhou, Qiqi & Wang, Bei & Mayer, Igor, 2024. "Understanding the social construction of the metaverse with Q methodology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    16. Hudson, Marc, 2018. "Ending technocracy with a neologism? Avivocracy as a conceptual tool," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 136-139.
    17. Kheirandish, Shadi & Funk, Mathias & Wensveen, Stephan & Verkerk, Maarten & Rauterberg, Matthias, 2020. "A comprehensive value framework for design," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    18. Claudy, Marius C. & Parkinson, Mary & Aquino, Karl, 2024. "Why should innovators care about morality? Political ideology, moral foundations, and the acceptance of technological innovations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    19. Irwansyah,, 2020. "The social contractual utilitarianism of a digital village in rural Indonesia," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    20. Nelson, Jake & Gorichanaz, Tim, 2019. "Trust as an ethical value in emerging technology governance: The case of drone regulation," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:envval:v:33:y:2024:i:4:p:414-433. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.