IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/teinso/v32y2010i3p173-182.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Envisioning nanotechnology: New media and future-oriented stakeholder dialogue

Author

Listed:
  • Selin, Cynthia
  • Hudson, Rebecca

Abstract

Nanotechnology promises to transform everyday life, yet there has been little reflection about the dilemmas, trade-offs and complex choices involved. Our project constructed a virtual public engagement platform in order to elucidate perspectives on multiple, plausible visions of human enhancement. Our new media platform operationalized open-source scenario planning to enable diverse communities to assess, critique and debate prospective nanotechnology-enabled products. Extending participation and deliberation through open-source mechanisms was an experiment involving not only an innovation of public engagement but also of traditional scenario planning. By revealing the NanoFutures project design and analysis, this paper explores to what extent this public engagement led to genuine dialogue and illustrates the risks and benefits of using multi-media tools in social science research.

Suggested Citation

  • Selin, Cynthia & Hudson, Rebecca, 2010. "Envisioning nanotechnology: New media and future-oriented stakeholder dialogue," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 173-182.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:173-182
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.07.008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X10000564
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techsoc.2010.07.008?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Moor, A. & Efimova, L., 2004. "An argumentation analysis of weblog conversations," Other publications TiSEM f69da407-f6c0-4006-8a50-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Buhmann, Alexander & Fieseler, Christian, 2021. "Towards a deliberative framework for responsible innovation in artificial intelligence," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    2. Monaghan, Conal & Bizumic, Boris & Van Rooy, Dirk, 2020. "An analysis of public attitudes in Australia towards applications of biotechnology to humans: Kinds, causes, and effects," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    3. Aitken, Mhairi & Ng, Magdalene & Horsfall, Dave & Coopamootoo, Kovila P.L. & van Moorsel, Aad & Elliott, Karen, 2021. "In pursuit of socially-minded data-intensive innovation in banking: A focus group study of public expectations of digital innovation in banking," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    4. Saidi, Trust & Zeiss, Ragna, 2016. "Investigating promises of nanotechnology for development: A case study of the travelling of smart nano water filter in Zimbabwe," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 40-48.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Semahat Isil Acikalin, 2008. "What About Gender Based Pseudonyms In Blogs?," Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, Anadolu University, vol. 8(1), pages 275-284, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:teinso:v:32:y:2010:i:3:p:173-182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/technology-in-society .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.