IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/and/journl/v8y2008i1p275-284.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

What About Gender Based Pseudonyms In Blogs?

Author

Listed:
  • Semahat Isil Acikalin

    (Anadolu University)

Abstract

In computer mediated communication there are no visual or auditory clues to indicate speaker’s gender. Usually pseudonyms are used by the participants to hide explicit identity. In blogs (which are personal journals or reversed chronological commentaries) pseudonymous usage is very common. However, pseudonyms may give clues on the gender of a blogger. So, this study aims at investigating the following hypothesis: Males prefer to use pseudonyms whose connotative meanings refer to power, fear and authority, whereas females prefer to use pseudonyms about domestic issues, style and names concerning nature with positive meanings. 40 male and 40 female pseudonyms chosen by the bloggers are taken into consideration. The demographic information concerning their real gender was available on their home page. The results of the study showed that the connotative meaning of pseudonyms used in blogs reveal the gender differences no matter how hard they try to hide their gender identity.

Suggested Citation

  • Semahat Isil Acikalin, 2008. "What About Gender Based Pseudonyms In Blogs?," Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, Anadolu University, vol. 8(1), pages 275-284, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:8:y:2008:i:1:p:275-284
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.anadolu.edu.tr/arastirma/hakemli_dergiler/sosyal_bilimler/pdf/2008-1/2008_01_16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. de Moor, A. & Efimova, L., 2004. "An argumentation analysis of weblog conversations," Other publications TiSEM f69da407-f6c0-4006-8a50-c, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Selin, Cynthia & Hudson, Rebecca, 2010. "Envisioning nanotechnology: New media and future-oriented stakeholder dialogue," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 173-182.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pseudonym; blogs; linguistic gender differences;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z00 - Other Special Topics - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:and:journl:v:8:y:2008:i:1:p:275-284. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Social Sciences Institute (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iianatr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.