IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v209y2024ics0040162524005924.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The quest for valuable inventions: Knowledge search and the value of patented inventions

Author

Listed:
  • Hou, Tianyu
  • Zhang, Liang
  • Li, Julie Juan
  • Chong, Bin
  • Wu, Yanzi

Abstract

While numerous studies have investigated the influence of knowledge search strategies on the impact of patented inventions, these studies predominantly focus on an invention's technological value. The economic value dimension has received less attention. This study draws on category-spanning and recombinant search literature to examine how knowledge search affects the economic value of patented inventions and compares this impact with that on technological value. Through an analysis of the knowledge search of a large sample of 1,998,504 U.S. utility patents, we find that knowledge search depth enhances an invention's economic value but negatively impacts its technological value. In contrast, knowledge search scope boosts an invention's technological value but diminishes its economic value. Moreover, knowledge relatedness, i.e., the extent to which the knowledge components being recombined are similar, has significant moderating effects. We conclude with a discussion of the theoretical and practical implications of our findings.

Suggested Citation

  • Hou, Tianyu & Zhang, Liang & Li, Julie Juan & Chong, Bin & Wu, Yanzi, 2024. "The quest for valuable inventions: Knowledge search and the value of patented inventions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:209:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524005924
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123794
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162524005924
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123794?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:209:y:2024:i:c:s0040162524005924. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.