IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v206y2024ics004016252400355x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-index analysis with readiness levels for decision support in product design

Author

Listed:
  • Lowe, David C.
  • Justham, Laura
  • Everitt, Mark J.

Abstract

The Technology Readiness Level (TRL) was introduced by NASA in 1974 to measure the technical maturity of equipment deployment in space missions. It has since been widely adopted for the assessment of technical readiness in novel products and systems across many sectors. But TRL does not capture all the dimensions needed to assess the maturity and suitability for production of a given product concept. Additional metrics have been proposed to measure other design parameters, but we note the lack of a comprehensive mechanism capable of assessing together all the parameters that affect the potential for success or failure of a product. In this article we propose the novel Multi-Index Analysis (MIA) methodology that maps existing metrics onto one comprehensive single index. In this work we demonstrate the application of MIA with 10 known metrics comprising 39 design dimensions to demonstrate that this approach enables a multi-factor analysis that is not possible with individual metrics. We detail four general cases for the application of this index including the single evaluation of one or more product design concepts, and the multiple evaluations of one or more product concepts made over time. Multiple evaluations yield trend data and this can aid in predicting the likely success of a product concept over its lifecycle. Modelling and predicting the evolution of MIA scores for different product concepts at an early stage of design enables an optimum solution to be selected and crafted. We provide a software tool to enable convenient MIA assessment.

Suggested Citation

  • Lowe, David C. & Justham, Laura & Everitt, Mark J., 2024. "Multi-index analysis with readiness levels for decision support in product design," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:206:y:2024:i:c:s004016252400355x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123559
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004016252400355X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2024.123559?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Islam, Nazrul & Marinakis, Yorgos & Majadillas, Mary Anne & Fink, Matthias & Walsh, Steven T., 2020. "Here there be dragons, a pre-roadmap construct for IoT service infrastructure," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    2. Aloini, Davide & Dulmin, Riccardo & Mininno, Valeria & Pellegrini, Luisa & Farina, Giulia, 2018. "Technology assessment with IF-TOPSIS: An application in the advanced underwater system sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 38-48.
    3. Carpentier, Cécile & Suret, Jean-Marc, 2015. "Angel group members' decision process and rejection criteria: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 808-821.
    4. Kobos, Peter H. & Malczynski, Leonard A. & Walker, La Tonya N. & Borns, David J. & Klise, Geoffrey T., 2018. "Timing is everything: A technology transition framework for regulatory and market readiness levels," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 211-225.
    5. Vik, Jostein & Melås, Anders Mahlum & Stræte, Egil Petter & Søraa, Roger Andre, 2021. "Balanced readiness level assessment (BRLa): A tool for exploring new and emerging technologies," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 169(C).
    6. Thomas J. Chemmanur & Zhaohui Chen, 2014. "Venture Capitalists Versus Angels: The Dynamics of Private Firm Financing Contracts," The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 3(1-2), pages 39-86.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Engineer, Merwan H. & Schure, Paul & Vo, Dan H., 2019. "Hide and seek search: Why angels hide and entrepreneurs seek," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 523-540.
    2. Iurkov, Viacheslav & Koval, Mariia & Zakaryan, Arusyak, 2023. "The role of network community characteristics for firms' rapid business scaling," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Bonini, Stefano & Capizzi, Vincenzo & Zocchi, Paola, 2019. "The performance of angel-backed companies," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 328-345.
    4. Marit Sprenkeling & Tara Geerdink & Adriaan Slob & Amber Geurts, 2022. "Bridging Social and Technical Sciences: Introduction of the Societal Embeddedness Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-16, August.
    5. Lefebvre, Vincent & Certhoux, Gilles & Radu-Lefebvre, Miruna, 2022. "Sustaining trust to cross the Valley of Death: A retrospective study of business angels’ investment and reinvestment decisions," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Dimitrios Mendrinos & Spyridon Karytsas & Olympia Polyzou & Constantine Karytsas & Åsta Dyrnes Nordø & Kirsti Midttømme & Danny Otto & Matthias Gross & Marit Sprenkeling & Ruben Peuchen & Tara Geerdin, 2022. "Understanding Societal Requirements of CCS Projects: Application of the Societal Embeddedness Level Assessment Methodology in Four National Case Studies," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-15, September.
    7. Volodymyr Babich & Simone Marinesi & Gerry Tsoukalas, 2021. "Does Crowdfunding Benefit Entrepreneurs and Venture Capital Investors?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(2), pages 508-524, March.
    8. Harrison, Richard T. & Bock, Adam J. & Gregson, Geoff, 2020. "Stairway to heaven? rethinking angel investment policy and practice," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 14(C).
    9. Hoffmann, Robert & Chesney, Thomas & Chuah, Swee-Hoon & Kock, Florian & Larner, Jeremy, 2020. "Demonstrability, difficulty and persuasion: An experimental study of advice taking," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    10. Fang, Hong & Wang, Xu & Song, Wenyan, 2020. "Technology selection for photovoltaic cell from sustainability perspective: An integrated approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1029-1041.
    11. Mojca Svetek, 2023. "The Role of Entrepreneurs’ Perceived Competence and Cooperativeness in Early-Stage Financing," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2047-2076, November.
    12. Lange, Francie & Tomini, Nino & Brinkmann, Florian & Kanbach, Dominik K. & Kraus, Sascha, 2023. "Demystifying massive and rapid business scaling – An explorative study on driving factors in digital start-ups," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    13. Wang, Xu & Fang, Hong & Fang, Siran, 2020. "An integrated approach for exploitation block selection of shale gas—based on cloud model and grey relational analysis," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    14. Katarzyna Halicka, 2020. "Technology Selection Using the TOPSIS Method," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(1), pages 85-96.
    15. Righi, Riccardo & Pedrazzoli, Alessia & Righi, Simone & Venturelli, Valeria, 2024. "The clientele effects in equity crowdfunding: A complex network analysis," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 42(C).
    16. Elia, A. & Taylor, M. & Ó Gallachóir, B. & Rogan, F., 2020. "Wind turbine cost reduction: A detailed bottom-up analysis of innovation drivers," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    17. Claudio Roberto Silva Júnior & Julio Cezar Mairesse Siluk & Alvaro Luis Neuenfeldt-Júnior & Matheus Binotto Francescatto & Cláudia de Freitas Michelin, 2023. "Mapping Risks Faced by Startup Investors: An Approach Based on the Apriori Algorithm," Risks, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-19, October.
    18. Carpentier, Cécile & Suret, Jean-Marc, 2015. "Angel group members' decision process and rejection criteria: A longitudinal analysis," Journal of Business Venturing, Elsevier, vol. 30(6), pages 808-821.
    19. Yann Truong & Brian G. Nagy, 2021. "Nascent ventures’ green initiatives and angel investor judgments of legitimacy and funding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1801-1818, December.
    20. Brett Anthony White & John Dumay, 2020. "The angel investment decision: insights from Australian business angels," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 60(3), pages 3133-3162, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:206:y:2024:i:c:s004016252400355x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.