IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v189y2023ics0040162523000604.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hey Siri, Google! Can you help me? A qualitative case study of smartphones AI functions in SMEs

Author

Listed:
  • Choudrie, Jyoti
  • Manandhar, Nuga
  • Castro, Carolina
  • Obuekwe, Chikelue

Abstract

Small to Medium Sized Enterprises are vital contributors to the economy of a country. These smaller organizations lag behind large organizations when implementing novel technologies. Smartphones offer Artificial Intelligence functions that are still being understood in the context of society and organizations alike. Recognising a research gap in Artificial Intelligence applications in the context of Small to Medium Sized Enterprises, the aim of this research study is: To explore, understand and explain smartphones AI enabled functions in the context of a case study. To achieve this aim, a qualitative study of a case study in Camden Market, London, United Kingdom was used. A sampling approach that used a non-random, snowball and purposive sampling led to 21 participants who were interviewed with open ended questions. This study found that some factors pertinent to mental, skills and usage access create a digital divide that leads to both positive and negative outcomes when using the AI Virtual Personal Assistants (VPAs) function of smartphones. In the positive outcomes, technoeustress emerged due to functions like, currency converters, language translation and weather forecasts. Negative outcomes included technostress where individuals did not understand the capabilities of VPAs. Also included in this paper are contributions and implications.

Suggested Citation

  • Choudrie, Jyoti & Manandhar, Nuga & Castro, Carolina & Obuekwe, Chikelue, 2023. "Hey Siri, Google! Can you help me? A qualitative case study of smartphones AI functions in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:189:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523000604
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122375
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162523000604
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122375?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wanda J. Orlikowski & Jack J. Baroudi, 1991. "Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 2(1), pages 1-28, March.
    2. Nancy Pouloudi & Wendy Currie & Edgar A. Whitley, 2016. "Entangled Stakeholder Roles and Perceptions in Health Information Systems: A Longitudinal Study of the U.K. NHS N3 Network," Post-Print hal-01282317, HAL.
    3. Millán, José María & Lyalkov, Serhiy & Burke, Andrew & Millán, Ana & van Stel, André, 2021. "‘Digital divide’ among European entrepreneurs: Which types benefit most from ICT implementation?," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 125(C), pages 533-547.
    4. Jeffrey S. Harrison & Douglas A. Bosse & Robert A. Phillips, 2010. "Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 58-74, January.
    5. Hans-Jörg Schlierer & Andrea Werner & Silvana Signori & Elisabeth Garriga & Heidi Weltzien Hoivik & Annick Rossem & Yves Fassin, 2012. "How Do European SME Owner–Managers Make Sense of ‘Stakeholder Management’?: Insights from a Cross-National Study," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 109(1), pages 39-51, August.
    6. Rouwette, Etiënne & van Kranenburg, Hans & Freeman, Edward, 2017. "Reviewing the role of stakeholders in Operational Research: A stakeholder theory perspectiveAuthor-Name: de Gooyert, Vincent," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 262(2), pages 402-410.
    7. Zipei Tu, 2022. "The Boundaries of Artificial Intelligence: Risks and the Future," Springer Books, in: The New Civilization Upon Data, chapter 0, pages 193-216, Springer.
    8. Hai Guo & Zhuen Yang & Ran Huang & Anqi Guo, 2020. "The digitalization and public crisis responses of small and medium enterprises: Implications from a COVID-19 survey," Frontiers of Business Research in China, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-25, December.
    9. Choudrie, Jyoti & Vyas, Amit, 2014. "Silver surfers adopting and using Facebook? A quantitative study of Hertfordshire, UK applied to organizational and social change," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 293-305.
    10. Pouloudi, Nancy & Currie, Wendy & Whitley, Edgar A., 2016. "Entangled stakeholder roles and perceptions in health information systems: a longitudinal study of the UK NHS N3 network," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 62275, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    11. Eggers, Fabian, 2020. "Masters of disasters? Challenges and opportunities for SMEs in times of crisis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 199-208.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Pramanik, Paritosh & Jana, Rabin K. & Ghosh, Indranil, 2024. "AI readiness enablers in developed and developing economies: Findings from the XGBoost regression and explainable AI framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Franco-Trigo, L. & Fernandez-Llimos, F. & Martínez-Martínez, F. & Benrimoj, S.I. & Sabater-Hernández, D., 2020. "Stakeholder analysis in health innovation planning processes: A systematic scoping review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(10), pages 1083-1099.
    2. Rubio-Andrés, Mercedes & Ramos-González, Mª del Mar & Sastre-Castillo, Miguel Ángel & Gutiérrez-Broncano, Santiago, 2023. "Stakeholder pressure and innovation capacity of SMEs in the COVID-19 pandemic: Mediating and multigroup analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    3. Medaglia, Rony & Eaton, Ben & Hedman, Jonas & Whitley, Edgar A., 2022. "Mechanisms of power inscription into IT governance: lessons from two national digital identity systems," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 108207, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Jyoti Choudrie & Efpraxia Zamani & Chike Obuekwe, 2022. "Bridging the Digital Divide in Ethnic Minority Older Adults: an Organisational Qualitative Study," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1355-1375, August.
    5. Yongyi Shou & Xueshu Shan & Jinan Shao & Kee-hung Lai & Qing Zhou, 2024. "How Do Foreign SMEs Mitigate Violent Conflict Risk by Doing Good? An Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 192(2), pages 407-422, June.
    6. Sefa Hayibor & Colleen Collins, 2016. "Motivators of Mobilization," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(2), pages 351-374, December.
    7. Nawal Abdalla Adam & Ghadah Alarifi, 2021. "Innovation practices for survival of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the COVID-19 times: the role of external support," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 10(1), pages 1-22, December.
    8. Gregory, Amanda J. & Atkins, Jonathan P. & Midgley, Gerald & Hodgson, Anthony M., 2020. "Stakeholder identification and engagement in problem structuring interventions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 283(1), pages 321-340.
    9. Daniel Fürstenau & Carolin Auschra & Stefan Klein & Martin Gersch, 2019. "A process perspective on platform design and management: evidence from a digital platform in health care," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 581-596, December.
    10. Liridon Kryeziu & Mehmet Bağış & Mehmet Nurullah Kurutkan & Besnik A. Krasniqi & Artan Haziri, 2022. "COVID-19 impact and firm reactions towards crisis: Evidence from a transition economy," Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Innovation, Fundacja Upowszechniająca Wiedzę i Naukę "Cognitione", vol. 18(1), pages 169-196.
    11. Ariana Polyviou & Efpraxia D. Zamani, 2023. "Are we Nearly There Yet? A Desires & Realities Framework for Europe’s AI Strategy," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 143-159, February.
    12. Danso, Albert & Adomako, Samuel & Lartey, Theophilus & Amankwah-Amoah, Joseph & Owusu-Yirenkyi, Diana, 2020. "Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and financial performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 652-662.
    13. Anna Stankiewicz-Mróz, 2019. "Influence of Interlocking Directorates on Integration after the Acquisition of Warsaw Stock Exchange—Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-22, December.
    14. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    15. Franck Brulhart & Sandrine Gherra & Bertrand V. Quelin, 2019. "Do Stakeholder Orientation and Environmental Proactivity Impact Firm Profitability?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 25-46, August.
    16. Elbanna, Amany & Newman, Mike, 2022. "The bright side and the dark side of top management support in Digital Transformaion –A hermeneutical reading," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    17. Ioannis Giotopoulos & Alexander S. Kritikos & Aggelos Tsakanikas, 2023. "A lasting crisis affects R&D decisions of smaller firms: the Greek experience," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 1161-1175, August.
    18. Gallear, David & Ghobadian, Abby & Chen, Weifeng, 2012. "Corporate responsibility, supply chain partnership and performance: An empirical examination," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 83-91.
    19. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Huyen Thanh T. Nguyen & Thanh-Hang Pham & Manh-Toan Ho & Minh-Hoang Nguyen, 2021. "Assessing the ideological homogeneity in entrepreneurial finance research by highly cited publications," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Aaltonen, Aleksi Ville & Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2021. "The making of data commodities: data analytics as an embedded process," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 110296, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:189:y:2023:i:c:s0040162523000604. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.