IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v173y2021ics0040162521005655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Impacts of land market policies on formal credit accessibility and agricultural net income: Evidence from China's apple growers

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Xingguang
  • Huo, Xuexi

Abstract

Ambiguous and uncertain structure of farmland property rights resulting from imperfect land market policies restricted the growth of agricultural net income in China. Thus, impacts of land market policies on formal credit accessibility and agricultural net income were analyzed in this paper. The data set from 1467 China's apple growers was used, and the results indicated that: (i) owing to damage the signal transmission function of farm size, administrative allocation reduced significantly formal credit accessibility at the 10% level; (ii) farmland registration and confirmation increased significantly output at the 1% level, and agricultural net income was significantly improved at the 10% level. Further, farmland registration and confirmation was conducive to enhancing the development of farmland rental markets and improving the expectation of tenure security, which boosted significantly agricultural net income. According to our findings, we suggest that central and local governments should continue to deepen market-oriented reforms and decrease unnecessary administrative intervention to develop the rural factors markets such as farmland rental markets and formal credit markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Xingguang & Huo, Xuexi, 2021. "Impacts of land market policies on formal credit accessibility and agricultural net income: Evidence from China's apple growers," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:173:y:2021:i:c:s0040162521005655
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121132
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162521005655
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121132?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sheng, Yu & Chancellor, Will, 2019. "Exploring the relationship between farm size and productivity: Evidence from the Australian grains industry," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 196-204.
    2. Deininger, Klaus & Jin, Songqing, 2009. "Securing property rights in transition: Lessons from implementation of China's rural land contracting law," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 70(1-2), pages 22-38, May.
    3. Galiani, Sebastian & Schargrodsky, Ernesto, 2010. "Property rights for the poor: Effects of land titling," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 94(9-10), pages 700-729, October.
    4. Andrew D. Foster & Mark R. Rosenzweig, 2022. "Are There Too Many Farms in the World? Labor Market Transaction Costs, Machine Capacities, and Optimal Farm Size," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(3), pages 636-680.
    5. Foltz, Jeremy D., 2004. "Credit market access and profitability in Tunisian agriculture," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 229-240, May.
    6. Deininger, Klaus & Songqing Jin & Adenew, Berhanu & Gebre-Selassie, Samuel & Demeke, Mulat, 2003. "Market and non-market transfers of land in Ethiopia - implications for efficiency, equity, and non-farm development," Policy Research Working Paper Series 2992, The World Bank.
    7. Yuan, Yan & Xu, Lihe, 2015. "Are poor able to access the informal credit market? Evidence from rural households in China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 232-246.
    8. Gershon Feder & Tongroj Onchan, 1987. "Land Ownership Security and Farm Investment in Thailand," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 69(2), pages 311-320.
    9. Leight, Jessica, 2016. "Reallocating wealth? Insecure property rights and agricultural investment in rural China," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 207-227.
    10. Kochar, Anjini, 1997. "An empirical investigation of rationing constraints in rural credit markets in India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 53(2), pages 339-371, August.
    11. Amalavoyal Chari & Elaine M Liu & Shing-Yi Wang & Yongxiang Wang, 2021. "Property Rights, Land Misallocation, and Agricultural Efficiency in China [Misallocation, Selection and Productivity: A Quantitative Analysis with Panel Data from China]," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 88(4), pages 1831-1862.
    12. Wang, Yahui & Li, Xiubin & Li, Wei & Tan, Minghong, 2018. "Land titling program and farmland rental market participation in China: Evidence from pilot provinces," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 281-290.
    13. Jin, Songqing & Deininger, Klaus, 2009. "Land rental markets in the process of rural structural transformation: Productivity and equity impacts from China," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 629-646, December.
    14. Alain de Janvry & Kyle Emerick & Marco Gonzalez-Navarro & Elisabeth Sadoulet, 2015. "Delinking Land Rights from Land Use: Certification and Migration in Mexico," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(10), pages 3125-3149, October.
    15. Li, Rui & Li, Qinghai & Huang, Shaoan & Zhu, Xi, 2013. "The credit rationing of Chinese rural households and its welfare loss: An investigation based on panel data," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 17-27.
    16. Cheng, Wenli & Xu, Yuyun & Zhou, Nan & He, Zaizhong & Zhang, Longyao, 2019. "How did land titling affect China’s rural land rental market? Size, composition and efficiency," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 609-619.
    17. Akinwumi A. Adesina & Kouakou K. Djato, 1996. "Farm size, relative efficiency and agrarian policy in Côte d'Ivoire: profit function analysis of rice farms," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 14(2), pages 93-102, July.
    18. Adesina, Akinwumi A. & Djato, Kouakou K., 1996. "Farm size, relative efficiency and agrarian policy in Cote d'Ivoire: profit function analysis of rice farms," Agricultural Economics, Blackwell, vol. 14(2), pages 93-102, July.
    19. Catherine Guirkinger & Stephen R. Boucher, 2008. "Credit constraints and productivity in Peruvian agriculture," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 39(3), pages 295-308, November.
    20. Fengxia Dong & Jing Lu & Allen M. Featherstone, 2012. "Effects of credit constraints on household productivity in rural China," Agricultural Finance Review, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 72(3), pages 402-415, November.
    21. Klaus Deininger & Daniel Ayalew Ali & Tekie Alemu, 2011. "Impacts of Land Certification on Tenure Security, Investment, and Land Market Participation: Evidence from Ethiopia," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 87(2), pages 312-334.
    22. Nakano, Yuko & Magezi, Eustadius F., 2020. "The impact of microcredit on agricultural technology adoption and productivity: Evidence from randomized control trial in Tanzania," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    23. Ito, Junichi & Bao, Zongshun & Ni, Jing, 2016. "Land rental development via institutional innovation in rural Jiangsu, China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 1-11.
    24. Deininger, Klaus & Feder, Gershon, 2001. "Land institutions and land markets," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, in: B. L. Gardner & G. C. Rausser (ed.), Handbook of Agricultural Economics, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 6, pages 288-331, Elsevier.
    25. Li, Xingguang & Liu, Jundi & Huo, Xuexi, 2021. "Impacts of tenure security and market-oriented allocation of farmland on agricultural productivity: Evidence from China’s apple growers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    26. Deininger, Klaus & Ali, Daniel Ayalew, 2007. "Do overlapping property rights reduce agricultural investment ? evidence from Uganda," Policy Research Working Paper Series 4310, The World Bank.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Li, Xingguang, 2023. "Farmland rental market participation and residential energy consumption: Evidence from rural areas in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    2. Punlork Men & Lyda Hok & Panchit Seeniang & B. Jan Middendorf & Rapee Dokmaithes, 2024. "Identifying Credit Accessibility Mechanisms for Conservation Agriculture Farmers in Cambodia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Xingguang Li & Xuexi Huo, 2022. "Impact of Farmland Rental Contract Disputes on Farmland Rental Market Participation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Fuwei Wang & Lei Du & Minghua Tian, 2022. "Does Agricultural Credit Input Promote Agricultural Green Total Factor Productivity? Evidence from Spatial Panel Data of 30 Provinces in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(1), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Yuanyuan Guo & Can Liu & Hao Liu & Ke Chen & Dan He, 2023. "Financial Literacy, Borrowing Behavior and Rural Households’ Income: Evidence from the Collective Forest Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Zhang, Lifeng & Chao, Xiangrui & Qian, Qian & Jing, Fuying, 2022. "Credit evaluation solutions for social groups with poor services in financial inclusion: A technical forecasting method," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gao, Xuwen & Shi, Xinjie & Fang, Shile, 2021. "Property rights and misallocation: Evidence from land certification in China," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    2. Deininger, Klaus & Savastano, Sara & Xia, Fang, 2017. "Smallholders’ land access in Sub-Saharan Africa: A new landscape?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 78-92.
    3. Liu, Shouying & Ma, Sen & Yin, Lijuan & Zhu, Jiong, 2023. "Land titling, human capital misallocation, and agricultural productivity in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 165(C).
    4. Xingguang Li & Xuexi Huo, 2022. "Impact of Farmland Rental Contract Disputes on Farmland Rental Market Participation," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-16, November.
    5. Li, Xinyi & Ito, Junichi, 2021. "An empirical study of land rental development in rural Gansu, China: The role of agricultural cooperatives and transaction costs," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. Ufer, Danielle & Ortega, David L., 2022. "Right on the Money? U.S. Farmers Have a Varied Understanding of Consumer Preferences and Attitudes over Animal Welfare and Biotechnology," 2022 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Anaheim, California 322269, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    7. Bu, Di & Liao, Yin, 2022. "Land property rights and rural enterprise growth: Evidence from land titling reform in China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    8. Jiang Du & Miao Zeng & Zhengjuan Xie & Shikun Wang, 2019. "Power of Agricultural Credit in Farmland Abandonment: Evidence from Rural China," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(12), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Li, Xingguang & Liu, Jundi & Huo, Xuexi, 2021. "Impacts of tenure security and market-oriented allocation of farmland on agricultural productivity: Evidence from China’s apple growers," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    10. Juan Zhang & Qin Chen, 2022. "The Impact of Farmland Tenure Security on China’s Agricultural Production Efficiency: A Perspective of Agricultural Production Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    11. Li, Xingguang, 2023. "Farmland rental market participation and residential energy consumption: Evidence from rural areas in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Lei Xu & Shixiang Chen & Shuliu Tian, 2022. "The Mechanism of Land Registration Program on Land Transfer in Rural China: Considering the Effects of Livelihood Security and Agricultural Management Incentives," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-25, August.
    13. Ma, Meilin, 2023. "Interdependent investments in attached and movable assets under insecure land rights," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    14. Hu, Xinyan & Chen, Zhuo & Chen, Xiangpo & Liu, Ziyu, 2023. "The political trust impacts of land titling in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    15. Marijn A. Bolhuis & Swapnika R. Rachapalli & Diego Restuccia, 2021. "Misallocation in Indian Agriculture," NBER Working Papers 29363, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Jérémie GIGNOUX & Karen MACOURS & Liam WREN-LEWIS, 2015. "Impact of land administration programs on agricultural productivity and rural development: existing evidence, challenges and new approaches," Review of Agricultural and Environmental Studies - Revue d'Etudes en Agriculture et Environnement, INRA Department of Economics, vol. 96(3), pages 467-498.
    17. Xiaoyu Sun & Weijing Zhu & Aili Chen & Gangqiao Yang, 2022. "Land Certificated Program and Farmland “Stickiness” of Rural Labor: Based on the Perspective of Land Production Function," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Ting Ye & Wenjian He & Zhiyong Liu, 2022. "Exploring the Influence of Land Titling on Farmland Transfer-Out Based on Land Parcel Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    19. Zhao, Xiaoxue, 2020. "Land and labor allocation under communal tenure: Theory and evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Chaoran Chen & Diego Restuccia & Raul Santaeulalia-Llopis, 2022. "The Effects of Land Markets on Resource Allocation and Agricultural Productivity," Review of Economic Dynamics, Elsevier for the Society for Economic Dynamics, vol. 45, pages 41-54, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural net income; Formal credit accessibility; Administrative allocation; Market-oriented allocation; Farmland registration and confirmation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q18 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Policy; Food Policy; Animal Welfare Policy
    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:173:y:2021:i:c:s0040162521005655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.