IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/tefoso/v135y2018icp241-248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The adaptive mechanism between technology standardization and technology development: An empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Jiang, Hong
  • Zhao, Shukuan
  • Zhang, Siwen
  • Xu, Xiaobo

Abstract

The relationship between economy and technology has become more and more important, especially for emerging economies. The flow of capital, talents, information, technology, and other resources has increased the competition among enterprises. Technology standardization has been used to enhance enterprises' technical strength and accelerate the industrial technology development. However, technology standardization and technology development can promote each other only when both adapt to each other. Major factors influencing technology standardization and technology development have been studied by the grey absolute correlation, the grey relative correlation, and the grey comprehensive correlation. Policy recommendations are also presented to practitioners.

Suggested Citation

  • Jiang, Hong & Zhao, Shukuan & Zhang, Siwen & Xu, Xiaobo, 2018. "The adaptive mechanism between technology standardization and technology development: An empirical study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 241-248.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:135:y:2018:i:c:p:241-248
    DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0040162517315718
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.11.015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joseph Farrell & Garth Saloner, 1985. "Standardization, Compatibility, and Innovation," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 16(1), pages 70-83, Spring.
    2. Gauch, Stephan & Blind, Knut, 2015. "Technological convergence and the absorptive capacity of standardisation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 236-249.
    3. Li, Ling, 2013. "The path to Made-in-China: How this was done and future prospects," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(1), pages 4-13.
    4. Andrew Whitmore & Anurag Agarwal & Li Xu, 2015. "The Internet of Things—A survey of topics and trends," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 261-274, April.
    5. Lin, Hao-Chu & Luarn, Pin & Maa, Ren-Horng & Chen, Chao-Wen, 2012. "Adaptive foresight modular design and dynamic adjustment mechanism: Framework and Taiwan case study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(9), pages 1583-1591.
    6. Yun, JinHyo Joseph & Won, DongKyu & Jeong, EuiSeob & Park, KyungBae & Yang, JeongHo & Park, JiYoung, 2016. "The relationship between technology, business model, and market in autonomous car and intelligent robot industries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 142-155.
    7. Shancang Li & Li Da Xu & Shanshan Zhao, 2015. "The internet of things: a survey," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(2), pages 243-259, April.
    8. Huenteler, Joern & Schmidt, Tobias S. & Ossenbrink, Jan & Hoffmann, Volker H., 2016. "Technology life-cycles in the energy sector — Technological characteristics and the role of deployment for innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 102-121.
    9. Lichtenthaler, Ulrich, 2012. "Licensing technology to shape standards: Examining the influence of the industry context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 79(5), pages 851-861.
    10. Choi, Jinho & Hwang, Yong-Sik, 2014. "Patent keyword network analysis for improving technology development efficiency," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 170-182.
    11. Stanley M. Besen & Joseph Farrell, 1994. "Choosing How to Compete: Strategies and Tactics in Standardization," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 8(2), pages 117-131, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hong Jiang & Wentao Liu & Lili Jia, 2019. "How Humble Leadership Influences the Innovation of Technology Standards: A Moderated Mediation Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong Jiang & Sipeng Gao & Shukuan Zhao & Hong Chen, 2020. "Competition of technology standards in Industry 4.0: An innovation ecosystem perspective," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 772-783, July.
    2. Jiang, Hong & Zhao, Shukuan & Yuan, Yue & Zhang, Li & Duan, Lian & Zhang, Weiyong, 2018. "The coupling relationship between standard development and technology advancement: A game theoretical perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 169-177.
    3. Hong Jiang & Shuyu Sun & Hongtao Xu & Shukuan Zhao & Yong Chen, 2020. "Enterprises' network structure and their technology standardization capability in Industry 4.0," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 749-765, July.
    4. Raven, Michael & Blind, Knut, 2017. "The characteristics and impacts of scientific publications in biotechnology research referenced in standards," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 167-179.
    5. Shang, Juan & Li, Pengfei & Li, Ling & Chen, Yong, 2018. "The relationship between population growth and capital allocation in urbanization," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 249-256.
    6. Yu Sun & Ling Li & Hui Shi & Dazhi Chong, 2020. "The transformation and upgrade of China's manufacturing industry in Industry 4.0 era," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 734-740, July.
    7. Shang, Juan & Wang, Zhuo & Li, Ling & Chen, Yong & Li, Pengfei, 2018. "A study on the correlation between technology innovation and the new-type urbanization in Shaanxi province," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 266-273.
    8. Arfi, Wissal Ben & Nasr, Imed Ben & Kondrateva, Galina & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2021. "The role of trust in intention to use the IoT in eHealth: Application of the modified UTAUT in a consumer context," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    9. Chae, Bongsug (Kevin), 2018. "The Internet of Things (IoT): A Survey of Topics and Trends using Twitter Data and Topic Modeling," 22nd ITS Biennial Conference, Seoul 2018. Beyond the boundaries: Challenges for business, policy and society 190376, International Telecommunications Society (ITS).
    10. Qinghua Zheng & Chutong Yang & Haijun Yang & Jianhe Zhou, 2020. "A Fast Exact Algorithm for Deployment of Sensor Nodes for Internet of Things," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 22(4), pages 829-842, August.
    11. Tobias Kretschmer & Katrin Muehlfeld, 2004. "Co-opetition in Standard-Setting: The Case of the Compact Disc," Working Papers 04-14, NET Institute, revised Oct 2004.
    12. Justus Baron & Daniel F. Spulber, 2018. "Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database," Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(3), pages 462-503, September.
    13. den Hartigh, E. & Langerak, F. & Commandeur, H.R., 2002. "The Effects of Self-Reinforcing Mechanisms on Firm Performance," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2002-46-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    14. Damminda Alahakoon & Rashmika Nawaratne & Yan Xu & Daswin Silva & Uthayasankar Sivarajah & Bhumika Gupta, 2023. "Self-Building Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning to Empower Big Data Analytics in Smart Cities," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 221-240, February.
    15. Peter M. Bednar & Christine Welch, 0. "Socio-Technical Perspectives on Smart Working: Creating Meaningful and Sustainable Systems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-18.
    16. Ardito, Lorenzo & D'Adda, Diego & Messeni Petruzzelli, Antonio, 2018. "Mapping innovation dynamics in the Internet of Things domain: Evidence from patent analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 317-330.
    17. Mathias Dewatripont & Patrick Legros, 2000. "Mergers in Emerging Markets with Network Externalities: The Case of Telecoms," CIG Working Papers FS IV 00-23, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).
    18. Daniel P. Gross, 2020. "Collusive Investments in Technological Compatibility: Lessons from U.S. Railroads in the Late 19th Century," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(12), pages 5683-5700, December.
    19. Payam Hanafizadeh & Parastou Hatami & Morteza Analoui & Amir Albadvi, 2021. "Business model innovation driven by the internet of things technology, in internet service providers’ business context," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 19(4), pages 1175-1243, December.
    20. Kevin J. Boudreau, 2021. "Promoting Platform Takeoff and Self-Fulfilling Expectations: Field Experimental Evidence," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5953-5967, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:tefoso:v:135:y:2018:i:c:p:241-248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00401625 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.