The macrodynamics of an endogenous business cycle model of marxist inspiration
Author
Abstract
Suggested Citation
DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2022.08.002
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
References listed on IDEAS
- J. D. Pitchford, 1957. "Cost and Demand Elements in the Inflationary Process," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 24(2), pages 139-148.
- Bowles, Samuel, 1985. "The Production Process in a Competitive Economy: Walrasian, Neo-Hobbesian, and Marxian Models," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 75(1), pages 16-36, March.
- Araujo, Ricardo Azevedo & Dávila-Fernández, Marwil J. & Moreira, Helmar Nunes, 2019.
"Some new insights on the empirics of Goodwin's growth-cycle model,"
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 42-54.
- Ricardo A. Araújo & Marwil J. Dávila-Fernández, 2018. "Some new insights on the empirics of Goodwin’s growth-cycle model," Department of Economics University of Siena 790, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
- Deepankar Basu, 2017. "A Unified Marxist Approach to Accumulation and Crisis in Capitalist Economies," UMASS Amherst Economics Working Papers 2017-21, University of Massachusetts Amherst, Department of Economics.
- Lance Taylor & Duncan K Foley & Armon Rezai & Luiza Pires & Ozlem Omer & Ellis Scharfenaker, 2016.
"Demand Drives Growth All The Way,"
SCEPA working paper series.
2016-04, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
- Taylor, Lance & Foley, Duncan K. & Rezai, Armon, 2018. "Demand Drives Growth all the Way," Ecological Economic Papers 20, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
- Lance Taylor & Duncan Foley & Armon Rezai, 2017. "Demand Drives Growth all the Way," SCEPA working paper series. 2017-10, Schwartz Center for Economic Policy Analysis (SCEPA), The New School.
- Harris, Donald J, 1983. "Accumulation of Capital and the Rate of Profit in Marxian Theory," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 7(3-4), pages 311-330, September.
- David Laibman, 1997. "Capitalist Macrodynamics," Palgrave Macmillan Books, Palgrave Macmillan, number 978-0-230-37534-5, December.
- Dávila-Fernández, Marwil J. & Sordi, Serena, 2019.
"Distributive cycles and endogenous technical change in a BoPC growth model,"
Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 216-233.
- Marwil J. Dávila-Fernández & Serena Sordi, 2017. "Distributive cycles and endogenous technical change in a BoPC growth model," Department of Economics University of Siena 760, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
- Roberto Veneziani, 2013.
"Exploitation, inequality and power,"
Journal of Theoretical Politics, , vol. 25(4), pages 526-545, October.
- Veneziani, Roberto, 2008. "Exploitation, inequality, and power," MPRA Paper 30288, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Nelson H. Barbosa‐Filho & Lance Taylor, 2006. "Distributive And Demand Cycles In The Us Economy—A Structuralist Goodwin Model," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 57(3), pages 389-411, July.
- Eagly, Robert V, 1972. "A Macro Model of the Endogenous Business Cycle in Marxist Analysis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 80(3), pages 523-539, May-June.
- Skott, Peter, 1989. "Effective Demand, Class Struggle and Cyclical Growth," International Economic Review, Department of Economics, University of Pennsylvania and Osaka University Institute of Social and Economic Research Association, vol. 30(1), pages 231-247, February.
- Michalis Nikiforos, 2022. "Induced shifting involvements and cycles of growth and distribution," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 46(1), pages 73-103.
- Herbert Gintis & Herbert Gintis, 1976. "The Nature of Labor Exchange and the Theory of Capitalist Production," Review of Radical Political Economics, Union for Radical Political Economics, vol. 8(2), pages 36-54, July.
- Stavros Mavroudeas & Alexis Ioannides, 2011. "Duration, Intensity and Productivity of Labour and the Distinction between Absolute and Relative Surplus-value," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 421-437.
- Michalis Nikiforos & Duncan K. Foley, 2012. "Distribution And Capacity Utilization: Conceptual Issues And Empirical Evidence," Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(1), pages 200-229, February.
Citations
Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Cajas Guijarro, John, 2023. "An Extended Goodwin Model with Endogenous Technical Change: Theory and Simulation for the US Economy (1960-2019)," MPRA Paper 118878, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Cajas Guijarro, John, 2024. "An extended Goodwin model with endogenous technical change and labor supply," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 699-710.
- Cajas Guijarro, John, 2023. "A Classical Marxian Two-Sector Endogenous Cycle Model: Integrating Marx, Dutt, and Goodwin," MPRA Paper 118665, University Library of Munich, Germany.
Most related items
These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.- Cajas Guijarro, John, 2024. "An extended Goodwin model with endogenous technical change and labor supply," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 699-710.
- Araujo, Ricardo Azevedo & Dávila-Fernández, Marwil J. & Moreira, Helmar Nunes, 2019.
"Some new insights on the empirics of Goodwin's growth-cycle model,"
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 42-54.
- Ricardo A. Araújo & Marwil J. Dávila-Fernández, 2018. "Some new insights on the empirics of Goodwin’s growth-cycle model," Department of Economics University of Siena 790, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
- Gilbert L. Skillman, 2017. "Marx’s Capital through the lens of Roemer’s General Theory (and vice-versa)," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 49(3), pages 423-443, December.
- Gilberto Tadeu Lima & André M. Marques, 2024.
"Demand and distribution in a dynamic spatial panel model for the United States: Evidence from state‐level data,"
Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(4), pages 475-519, November.
- Gilberto Tadeu Lima & Andre M. Marques, 2022. "Demand and Distribution in a Dynamic Spatial Panel Model for the United States: Evidence from State-Level Data," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2022_21, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP), revised 05 Oct 2022.
- Robert A. Blecker, 2016.
"Wage-led versus profit-led demand regimes: the long and the short of it,"
Review of Keynesian Economics, Edward Elgar Publishing, vol. 4(4), pages 373-390, October.
- Robert A. Blecker, 2015. "Wage-led Versus Profit-led Demand Regimes: The Long and Short of It," Working Papers 2015-05, American University, Department of Economics.
- Jose Barrales‐Ruiz & Ivan Mendieta‐Muñoz & Codrina Rada & Daniele Tavani & Rudiger von Arnim, 2022.
"The distributive cycle: Evidence and current debates,"
Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(2), pages 468-503, April.
- Jose Barrales-Ruiz, Ivan Mendieta-Muñoz, Codrina Rada, Daniele Tavani, Rudiger von Arnim, 2021. "The distributive cycle: Evidence and current debates," Working Paper Series, Department of Economics, University of Utah 2021-01, University of Utah, Department of Economics.
- Mariollis, Theodore, 2012. "Goodwin’s Growth Cycle Model with the Bhaduri-Marglin Accumulation Function," MPRA Paper 40738, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Santetti, Marcio & Nikiforos, Michalis & von Arnim, Rudiger, 2024. "Growth, cycles, and residential investment," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 313-327.
- Stamegna, Marco, 2022. "Induced innovation, the distributive cycle, and the changing pattern of labour productivity cyclicality: a SVAR analysis for the US economy," MPRA Paper 113855, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Cajas Guijarro, John, 2023. "An Extended Goodwin Model with Endogenous Technical Change: Theory and Simulation for the US Economy (1960-2019)," MPRA Paper 118878, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Ghassan Dibeh, 2001. "Time Delays and Business Cycles: Hilferding's model revisited," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(3), pages 329-341.
- Cajas Guijarro, John, 2022. "Unpaid family labor and self-employment: Two multi-sector models of capitalist reproduction and endogenous cycles," MPRA Paper 116581, University Library of Munich, Germany.
- Marwil J. Dávila-Fernández, 2018. "Alternative Approaches to Technological Change when Growth is BoPC," Department of Economics University of Siena 795, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
- Spencer, David A, 2000. "The Demise of Radical Political Economics? An Essay on the Evolution of a Theory of Capitalist Production," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 24(5), pages 543-564, September.
- Cem Oyvat & Oğuz Öztunalı & Ceyhun Elgin, 2020.
"Wage‐led versus profit‐led demand: A comprehensive empirical analysis,"
Metroeconomica, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 458-486, July.
- Oyvat, Cem & Öztunalı, Oğuz & Elgin, Ceyhun, 2020. "Wage‐led versus profit‐led demand: a comprehensive empirical analysis," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 27870, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
- Fernando Rugitsky, 2016.
"Growth, distribution, and sectoral heterogeneity: Reading the Kaleckians in Latin America,"
Economia, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics], vol. 17(3), pages 265-278.
- Fernando Rugitsky, 2016. "Growth, distribution, and sectoral heterogeneity: reading the Kaleckians in Latin America," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2016_26, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
- Fernando Rugitsky, 2018. "Growth, Distribution, And Sectoral Heterogeneity: Reading The Kaleckians In Latin America," Anais do XLIV Encontro Nacional de Economia [Proceedings of the 44th Brazilian Economics Meeting] 85, ANPEC - Associação Nacional dos Centros de Pós-Graduação em Economia [Brazilian Association of Graduate Programs in Economics].
- Mariolis Theodore & Konstantakis Konstantinos N. & Michaelides Panayotis G. & Tsionas Efthymios G., 2019.
"A non-linear Keynesian Goodwin-type endogenous model of the cycle: Bayesian evidence for the USA,"
Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics, De Gruyter, vol. 23(1), pages 1-16, February.
- Mariolis, Theodore & Konstantakis, Konstantinos N. & Michaelides, Panayotis G. & Tsionas, Efthymios G., 2019. "A non-linear Keynesian Goodwin-type endogenous model of the cycle: Bayesian evidence for the USA," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 100229, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
- Christian Schoder, 2012. "Instability, stationary utilization and effective demand: A synthesis of Harrodian and Kaleckian growth theory," IMK Working Paper 104-2012, IMK at the Hans Boeckler Foundation, Macroeconomic Policy Institute.
- Giulio Palermo, 2005. "Misconceptions of Power: From Alchian and Demsetz to Bowles and Gintis," Working Papers ubs0510, University of Brescia, Department of Economics.
- Brenck, Clara & Carvalho, Laura, 2020.
"The equalizing spiral in early 21st century Brazil: a Kaleckian model with sectoral heterogeneity,"
Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 298-310.
- Clara Brenck & Laura Carvalho, 2019. "The equalizing spiral in early 21st century Brazil: a Kaleckian model with sectoral heterogeneity," Working Papers, Department of Economics 2019_30, University of São Paulo (FEA-USP).
More about this item
Keywords
Business cycle; Capital accumulation; Reserve army of labor; Labor intensity;All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- C63 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Mathematical Methods; Programming Models; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling - - - Computational Techniques
- E11 - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics - - General Aggregative Models - - - Marxian; Sraffian; Kaleckian
- O41 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models
Statistics
Access and download statisticsCorrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:streco:v:62:y:2022:i:c:p:566-585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/525148 .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.