IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v85y2014icp69-77.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sign tests using ranked set sampling with unequal set sizes

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Liangyong
  • Dong, Xiaofang
  • Xu, Xingzhong

Abstract

This paper considers sign test under ranked set sampling with unequal set sizes (RSSU), and proposes weighted sign tests associated with judgment ranks. The optimal weight vector is shown to be distribution-free, and RSSU is shown to be more efficient than ranked set sampling.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Liangyong & Dong, Xiaofang & Xu, Xingzhong, 2014. "Sign tests using ranked set sampling with unequal set sizes," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 69-77.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:85:y:2014:i:c:p:69-77
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spl.2013.11.006
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167715213003878
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spl.2013.11.006?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Öztürk, Ömer & Wolfe, Douglas A., 2000. "Alternative ranked set sampling protocols for the sign test," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 47(1), pages 15-23, March.
    2. Dinesh S. Bhoj, 2001. "Ranked Set Sampling with Unequal Samples," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 57(3), pages 957-962, September.
    3. Wang, You-Gan & Zhu, Min, 2005. "Optimal sign tests for data from ranked set samples," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 13-22, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Parisa Hasanalipour & Mostafa Razmkhah, 2021. "Testing skew-symmetry based on extreme ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 62(5), pages 2311-2332, October.
    2. Hamid Rahmani & Mostafa Razmkhah, 2017. "Perfect ranking test in moving extreme ranked set sampling," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 855-875, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, You-Gan & Zhu, Min, 2005. "Optimal sign tests for data from ranked set samples," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 72(1), pages 13-22, April.
    2. Arnold, Barry C. & Castillo, Enrique & María Sarabia, José, 2009. "On multivariate order statistics. Application to ranked set sampling," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 53(12), pages 4555-4569, October.
    3. Dinesh S. Bhoj & Girish Chandra, 2024. "Weighted Ranked Set Sampling for Skewed Distributions," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-11, June.
    4. Lutz Dümbgen & Ehsan Zamanzade, 2020. "Inference on a distribution function from ranked set samples," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 72(1), pages 157-185, February.
    5. Omer Ozturk & Steven MacEachern, 2004. "Order restricted randomized designs for control versus treatment comparison," Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, Springer;The Institute of Statistical Mathematics, vol. 56(4), pages 701-720, December.
    6. Hani Samawi & Mohammed Al-Haj Ebrahem & Noha Al-Zubaidin, 2010. "An optimal sign test for one-sample bivariate location model using an alternative bivariate ranked-set sample," Journal of Applied Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 629-650.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:85:y:2014:i:c:p:69-77. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.