IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v81y2011i1p157-162.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Insuring against loss of evidence in game-theoretic probability

Author

Listed:
  • Dawid, A. Philip
  • de Rooij, Steven
  • Shafer, Glenn
  • Shen, Alexander
  • Vereshchagin, Nikolai
  • Vovk, Vladimir

Abstract

Statistical testing can be framed as a repetitive game between two players, Forecaster and Sceptic. In each round, Forecaster sets prices for various gambles, and Sceptic chooses which gambles to make. If Sceptic multiplies by a large factor the capital he puts at risk, he has evidence against Forecaster's ability. His capital at the end of each round is a measure of his evidence against Forecaster so far. This can go up and then back down. If you report the maximum so far instead of the current value, you are exaggerating the evidence against Forecaster. In this article, we show how to remove the exaggeration. Removing it means systematically reducing the maximum in such a way that a rival to Sceptic can always play so as to obtain current evidence as good as Sceptic's reduced maximum. We characterize the functions that can achieve such reductions. Because these functions may impose only modest reductions, we think of our result as a method of insuring against loss of evidence. In the context of an actual market, it is a method of insuring against the loss of what an investor has gained so far.

Suggested Citation

  • Dawid, A. Philip & de Rooij, Steven & Shafer, Glenn & Shen, Alexander & Vereshchagin, Nikolai & Vovk, Vladimir, 2011. "Insuring against loss of evidence in game-theoretic probability," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 81(1), pages 157-162, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:81:y:2011:i:1:p:157-162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(10)00296-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vladimir Vovk, 2017. "Non-stochastic portfolio theory," Papers 1712.09108, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2018.
    2. A. Philip Dawid & Steven de Rooij & Peter Grunwald & Wouter M. Koolen & Glenn Shafer & Alexander Shen & Nikolai Vereshchagin & Vladimir Vovk, 2011. "Probability-free pricing of adjusted American lookbacks," Papers 1108.4113, arXiv.org.
    3. Vladimir Vovk, 2012. "Continuous-time trading and the emergence of probability," Finance and Stochastics, Springer, vol. 16(4), pages 561-609, October.
    4. Glenn Shafer, 2021. "Author's reply to the Discussion of ‘Testing by betting: A strategy for statistical and scientific communication’ by Glenn Shafer," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 184(2), pages 466-478, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:81:y:2011:i:1:p:157-162. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.