IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/stapro/v77y2007i10p981-988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A note on proportional hazards and proportional odds models

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Shande
  • Manatunga, Amita K.

Abstract

The proportional hazards model has been used as a major model for analyzing survival data. When there are heavy ties, the proportional odds model is often recommended as an alternative. In this paper, we explore theoretical properties of these two models. We obtain a necessary condition for the discrete proportional odds model. We study the relationship between the proportional hazards and proportional odds models when the continuous times are discretized. Using this relationship, we derive a characterization result for the proportional hazards model, showing that the proportional hazards model is only related to the geometric distribution, a special case of the proportional odds model. We highlight this important difference between the two models that seems to be ignored in the analysis of real data. Using small numerical studies, we show that caution should be taken in using a proportional odds model in place of a proportional hazards model.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Shande & Manatunga, Amita K., 2007. "A note on proportional hazards and proportional odds models," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 77(10), pages 981-988, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:77:y:2007:i:10:p:981-988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167-7152(07)00037-5
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrico A. Colosimo & Liciana V. A. S. Chalita & Clarice G. B. Demétrio, 2000. "Tests of Proportional Hazards and Proportional Odds Models for Grouped Survival Data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 56(4), pages 1233-1240, December.
    2. Nan Lin & Xuming He, 2006. "Robust and efficient estimation under data grouping," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 93(1), pages 99-112, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhong Guan, 2017. "Bernstein polynomial model for grouped continuous data," Journal of Nonparametric Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(4), pages 831-848, October.
    2. Cristine Rauber & Francisco Cribari-Neto & Fábio M. Bayer, 2020. "Improved testing inferences for beta regressions with parametric mean link function," AStA Advances in Statistical Analysis, Springer;German Statistical Society, vol. 104(4), pages 687-717, December.
    3. Hashimoto, Elizabeth M. & Ortega, Edwin M.M. & Paula, Gilberto A. & Barreto, Mauricio L., 2011. "Regression models for grouped survival data: Estimation and sensitivity analysis," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 993-1007, February.
    4. Zhou, Wei & O'Neill, Eoghan & Moncaster, Alice & Reiner, David M. & Guthrie, Peter, 2020. "Forecasting urban residential stock turnover dynamics using system dynamics and Bayesian model averaging," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 275(C).
    5. Chudamani Poudyal, 2024. "Robust Estimation of the Tail Index of a Single Parameter Pareto Distribution from Grouped Data," Papers 2401.14593, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2024.
    6. Diego Ramos Canterle & Fábio Mariano Bayer, 2019. "Variable dispersion beta regressions with parametric link functions," Statistical Papers, Springer, vol. 60(5), pages 1541-1567, October.
    7. Xudong Du & Mier Li & Ping Zhu & Ju Wang & Lisha Hou & Jijie Li & Hongdao Meng & Muke Zhou & Cairong Zhu, 2018. "Comparison of the flexible parametric survival model and Cox model in estimating Markov transition probabilities using real-world data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(8), pages 1-13, August.
    8. Rachel MacKay Altman & Andrew Henrey, 2018. "Practical considerations when analyzing discrete survival times using the grouped relative risk model," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 24(3), pages 532-547, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:stapro:v:77:y:2007:i:10:p:981-988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/622892/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.