IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spapps/v130y2020i11p6927-6964.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mean field games with controlled jump–diffusion dynamics: Existence results and an illiquid interbank market model

Author

Listed:
  • Benazzoli, Chiara
  • Campi, Luciano
  • Di Persio, Luca

Abstract

We study a family of mean field games with a state variable evolving as a multivariate jump–diffusion process. The jump component is driven by a Poisson process with a time-dependent intensity function. All coefficients, i.e. drift, volatility and jump size, are controlled. Under fairly general conditions, we establish existence of a solution in a relaxed version of the mean field game and give conditions under which the optimal strategies are in fact Markovian, hence extending to a jump–diffusion setting previous results established in Lacker (2015). The proofs rely upon the notions of relaxed controls and martingale problems. Finally, to complement the abstract existence results, we study a simple illiquid inter-bank market model, where the banks can change their reserves only at the jump times of some exogenous Poisson processes with a common constant intensity, and provide some numerical results.

Suggested Citation

  • Benazzoli, Chiara & Campi, Luciano & Di Persio, Luca, 2020. "Mean field games with controlled jump–diffusion dynamics: Existence results and an illiquid interbank market model," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(11), pages 6927-6964.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:130:y:2020:i:11:p:6927-6964
    DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2020.07.004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030441492030315X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.spa.2020.07.004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Olivier Guéant & Pierre Louis Lions & Jean-Michel Lasry, 2011. "Mean Field Games and Applications," Post-Print hal-01393103, HAL.
    2. Fu, Guanxing & Horst, Ulrich, 2017. "Mean Field Games with Singular Controls," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 22, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    3. Lacker, Daniel, 2015. "Mean field games via controlled martingale problems: Existence of Markovian equilibria," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 125(7), pages 2856-2894.
    4. Graham, Carl, 1992. "McKean-Vlasov Ito-Skorohod equations, and nonlinear diffusions with discrete jump sets," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 69-82, February.
    5. Charalambos D. Aliprantis & Kim C. Border, 2006. "Infinite Dimensional Analysis," Springer Books, Springer, edition 0, number 978-3-540-29587-7, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Mingyan & Hao, Zimo, 2023. "Well-posedness of density dependent SDE driven by α-stable process with Hölder drifts," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 416-442.
    2. Andrés Cárdenas & Sergio Pulido & Rafael Serrano, 2022. "Existence of optimal controls for stochastic Volterra equations," Working Papers hal-03720342, HAL.
    3. Lijun Bo & Shihua Wang & Xiang Yu, 2021. "Mean Field Game of Optimal Relative Investment with Jump Risk," Papers 2108.00799, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2023.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cao, Haoyang & Guo, Xin, 2022. "MFGs for partially reversible investment," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 995-1014.
    2. Andrés Cárdenas & Sergio Pulido & Rafael Serrano, 2022. "Existence of optimal controls for stochastic Volterra equations," Working Papers hal-03720342, HAL.
    3. Haoyang Cao & Jodi Dianetti & Giorgio Ferrari, 2021. "Stationary Discounted and Ergodic Mean Field Games of Singular Control," Papers 2105.07213, arXiv.org.
    4. Benazzoli, Chiara & Campi, Luciano & Di Persio, Luca, 2019. "ε-Nash equilibrium in stochastic differential games with mean-field interaction and controlled jumps," Statistics & Probability Letters, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Dianetti, Jodi & Ferrari, Giorgio & Fischer, Markus & Nendel, Max, 2022. "A Unifying Framework for Submodular Mean Field Games," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 661, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    6. Berenice Anne Neumann, 2020. "Stationary Equilibria of Mean Field Games with Finite State and Action Space," Dynamic Games and Applications, Springer, vol. 10(4), pages 845-871, December.
    7. Cao, Haoyang & Dianetti, Jodi & Ferrari, Giorgio, 2021. "Stationary Discounted and Ergodic Mean Field Games of Singular Control," Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers 650, Center for Mathematical Economics, Bielefeld University.
    8. Campi, Luciano & Zabaljauregui, Diego, 2020. "Optimal market making under partial information with general intensities," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 104612, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    9. He, Wei & Sun, Yeneng, 2013. "Stationary Markov Perfect Equilibria in Discounted Stochastic Games," MPRA Paper 51274, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Samuel Daudin, 2022. "Optimal Control of Diffusion Processes with Terminal Constraint in Law," Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 195(1), pages 1-41, October.
    11. Eduardo Perez & Delphine Prady, 2012. "Complicating to Persuade?," Working Papers hal-03583827, HAL.
    12. Romain Blanchard & Laurence Carassus & Miklós Rásonyi, 2018. "No-arbitrage and optimal investment with possibly non-concave utilities: a measure theoretical approach," Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, Springer;Gesellschaft für Operations Research (GOR);Nederlands Genootschap voor Besliskunde (NGB), vol. 88(2), pages 241-281, October.
    13. Régis Chenavaz & Corina Paraschiv & Gabriel Turinici, 2017. "Dynamic Pricing of New Products in Competitive Markets: A Mean-Field Game Approach," Working Papers hal-01592958, HAL.
    14. René Aïd & Matteo Basei & Giorgia Callegaro & Luciano Campi & Tiziano Vargiolu, 2020. "Nonzero-Sum Stochastic Differential Games with Impulse Controls: A Verification Theorem with Applications," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 45(1), pages 205-232, February.
    15. He, Wei & Yannelis, Nicholas C., 2015. "Equilibrium theory under ambiguity," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 86-95.
    16. Massimiliano Amarante & Mario Ghossoub & Edmund Phelps, 2012. "Contracting for Innovation under Knightian Uncertainty," Cahiers de recherche 18-2012, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    17. Sudhir A. Shah, 2016. "The Generalized Arrow-Pratt Coefficient," Working Papers id:10795, eSocialSciences.
    18. Luçon, Eric, 2020. "Quenched asymptotics for interacting diffusions on inhomogeneous random graphs," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 130(11), pages 6783-6842.
    19. Lashi Bandara & Paul Bryan, 2020. "Heat kernels and regularity for rough metrics on smooth manifolds," Mathematische Nachrichten, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 293(12), pages 2255-2270, December.
    20. Carlos Pimienta & Jianfei Shen, 2014. "On the equivalence between (quasi-)perfect and sequential equilibria," International Journal of Game Theory, Springer;Game Theory Society, vol. 43(2), pages 395-402, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spapps:v:130:y:2020:i:11:p:6927-6964. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505572/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.