IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/spacre/v18y2015i2p200-216.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Reforma de la normativa contable española: análisis de su entramado institucional

Author

Listed:
  • Doadrio, Leopoldo
  • Alvarado, María
  • Carrera, Nieves

Abstract

Este trabajo tiene como objetivo analizar el entramado institucional de la reforma contable española de 2007. Adoptando como marco teórico la teoría institucional, hemos identificado los grupos de presión que han tenido un peso significativo en el proceso de reforma y las implicaciones directas de su influencia sobre el Libro Blanco de 2002 y sobre el Plan General Contable de 2007. Para realizar el análisis, siguiendo el concepto de isomorfismo de DiMaggio y Powell, hemos clasificado los distintos grupos de interés en función de su capacidad para influir en el proceso. La evidencia empírica que soporta nuestra investigación se obtuvo a partir de las entrevistas realizadas a varios participantes en el proceso. Esta información se complementó con el análisis de documentos oficiales y de las opiniones publicadas en prensa y en revistas especializadas por distintos actores del proceso o personas afectadas por el mismo. Nuestras conclusiones sugieren el dominio del isomorfismo coercitivo en la reforma, a nivel tanto nacional (el papel del ejecutivo, a través del Instituto de Contabilidad y Auditoría de Cuentas) como supranacional (fundamentalmente de la Comisión Europea). También observamos la influencia de otros reguladores, como la Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores y el Banco de España, que, con su experiencia en sus ámbitos de actuación, desempeñaron un papel de «líderes» en el proceso en un ejemplo de isomorfismo mimético. Apreciamos además la influencia de presiones normativas con la participación de distintos grupos de expertos (e.g., académicos). Por último, es importante destacar el carácter cambiante y dinámico de dichas influencias a lo largo del proceso de reforma contable.

Suggested Citation

  • Doadrio, Leopoldo & Alvarado, María & Carrera, Nieves, 2015. "Reforma de la normativa contable española: análisis de su entramado institucional," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 200-216.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:spacre:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:200-216
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsar.2015.02.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138489115000175
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rcsar.2015.02.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gonzalo Angulo, José Antonio, 2014. "La reforma contable española de 2007: un balance," Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 17(2), pages 183-200.
    2. Bealing, William Jr, 1994. "Actions speak louder than words: An institutional perspective on the Securities and Exchange Commission," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 19(7), pages 555-567, October.
    3. Suddaby, Roy & Cooper, David J. & Greenwood, Royston, 2007. "Transnational regulation of professional services: Governance dynamics of field level organizational change," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(4-5), pages 333-362.
    4. Carpenter, Vivian L. & Feroz, Ehsan H., 1992. "GAAP as a symbol of legitimacy: New York State's decision to adopt generally accepted accounting principles," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 17(7), pages 613-643, October.
    5. Carlos Larrinaga-González & Miriam Núñez-Torrado & Fernando Gutiérrez-Hidalgo, 2008. "An Institutional Analysis of Cost Accounting Practices in the Spanish Eighteenth Century," Working Papers 08.04, Universidad Pablo de Olavide, Department of Business Administration.
    6. Roberts, Robin W. & Dwyer, Peggy D. & Sweeney, John T., 2003. "Political strategies used by the US public accounting profession during auditor liability reform: The case of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 22(5), pages 433-457.
    7. C.S.R. Murthy, 2007. "New Phase in UN Reforms," International Studies, , vol. 44(1), pages 39-56, January.
    8. Covaleski, Mark A. & Dirsmith, Mark W. & Rittenberg, Larry, 2003. "Jurisdictional disputes over professional work: the institutionalization of the global knowledge expert," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 323-355, May.
    9. Fogarty, Timothy J., 1992. "Financial accounting standard setting as an institutionalized action field: Constraints, opportunities and dilemmas," Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(4), pages 331-355.
    10. Salvador Carmona & Marta Macías, 2001. "Institutional Pressures, Monopolistic Conditions and the Implementation of Early Cost Management Practices: The Case of the Royal Tobacco Factory of Seville (1820–1887)," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 37(2), pages 139-165, June.
    11. Richardson, Alan J., 1987. "Accounting as a legitimating institution," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 341-355, June.
    12. Begoña Giner & Miguel Arce, 2012. "Lobbying on Accounting Standards: Evidence from IFRS 2 on Share-Based Payments," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(4), pages 655-691, December.
    13. Bealing, William Jr & Dirsmith, Mark W. & Fogarty, Timothy, 1996. "Early regulatory actions by the SEC: An institutional theory perspective on the dramaturgy of political exchanges," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 21(4), pages 317-338, May.
    14. Collin, Sven-Olof Yrjö & Tagesson, Torbjörn & Andersson, Anette & Cato, Joosefin & Hansson, Karin, 2009. "Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations: Positive accounting theory and institutional theory as competitive or concurrent theories," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 141-174.
    15. Anthony G. Hopwood, 1994. "Some reflections on 'The harmonization of accounting within the EU'," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 3(2), pages 241-254.
    16. Philippe Touron, 2005. "The adoption of US GAAP by French firms before the creation of the International Accounting Standard Committee: an institutional explanation," Post-Print hal-03002955, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Funnell, Warwick & Wade, Margaret, 2012. "Negotiating the credibility of performance auditing," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 434-450.
    2. Guerreiro, Marta Silva & Rodrigues, Lúcia Lima & Craig, Russell, 2012. "Voluntary adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards by large unlisted companies in Portugal – Institutional logics and strategic responses," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 37(7), pages 482-499.
    3. Alon, Anna & Dwyer, Peggy D., 2016. "SEC's acceptance of IFRS-based financial reporting: An examination based in institutional theory," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 1-16.
    4. Collin, Sven-Olof Yrjö & Tagesson, Torbjörn & Andersson, Anette & Cato, Joosefin & Hansson, Karin, 2009. "Explaining the choice of accounting standards in municipal corporations: Positive accounting theory and institutional theory as competitive or concurrent theories," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(2), pages 141-174.
    5. Guerreiro, Marta Silva & Rodrigues, Lúcia Lima & Craig, Russell, 2012. "Factors influencing the preparedness of large unlisted companies to implement adapted International Financial Reporting Standards in Portugal," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 21(2), pages 169-184.
    6. Shapiro, Brian & Matson, Diane, 2008. "Strategies of resistance to internal control regulation," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 33(2-3), pages 199-228.
    7. Krishnan, Sarada R., 2018. "Influence of transnational economic alliances on the IFRS convergence decision in India—Institutional perspectives," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 309-327.
    8. Bengtsson, Elias, 2011. "Repoliticalization of accounting standard setting—The IASB, the EU and the global financial crisis," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(6), pages 567-580.
    9. Stenka, Renata & Jaworska, Sylvia, 2019. "The use of made-up users," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    10. Robson, Keith & Ezzamel, Mahmoud, 2023. "The cultural fields of accounting practices: Institutionalization and accounting changes beyond the organization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    11. Samsonova, Anna, 2009. "Local sites of globalisation: A look at the development of a legislative framework for auditing in Russia," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 20(4), pages 528-552.
    12. Canning, Mary & O’Dwyer, Brendan, 2013. "The dynamics of a regulatory space realignment: Strategic responses in a local context," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 38(3), pages 169-194.
    13. Ana Paula Silva & Alexandra Fontes & Carlos Menezes & Tânia Menezes Montenegro, 2023. "Transitioning to an IFRS-Based Accounting System: Longitudinal Insights from Practitioners in Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-21, October.
    14. Daniella Juric & Brendan O’Connell & Michaela Rankin & Jacqueline Birt, 2018. "Determinants of the Severity of Legal and Employment Consequences for CPAs Named in SEC Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Releases," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(3), pages 545-563, February.
    15. Durocher, Sylvain & Picard, Claire-France & Dugal, Léa, 2024. "Giving sense to and making sense of OCI: When each component makes sense, but the whole does not," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    16. Suddaby, Roy & Saxton, Gregory D. & Gunz, Sally, 2015. "Twittering change: The institutional work of domain change in accounting expertise," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 52-68.
    17. Masrani, Swapnesh & McKiernan, Peter, 2011. "Accounting as a legitimising device in voluntary price agreements: The Dundee jute industry, 1945–1960," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 22(4), pages 415-433.
    18. Déjean, Frédérique, 2004. "Contribution à l'étude de l'investissement socialement responsable : Les stratégies de légitimation des sociétés de gestion," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/10473 edited by Colasse, Bernard.
    19. Paola Ramassa & Alberto Quagli, 2024. "Interpreting IFRS: The Evolving Role of Agenda Decisions," Abacus, Accounting Foundation, University of Sydney, vol. 60(2), pages 205-235, June.
    20. Dominique Dufour & Pierre Teller & Philippe Luu, 2014. "A neo-institutionalist model of the diffusion of IFRS accounting standards," Post-Print hal-00719046, HAL.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Reforma contable española; Libro blanco 2002; Plan general contable 2007 (PGC; 2007); Teoría institucional; Isomorfismo; Reform of Spanish accounting standards; White Book 2002; 2007 Spanish Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (2007 Spanish GAAP); Institutional theory; Isomorphism;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:spacre:v:18:y:2015:i:2:p:200-216. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/intelligence .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.