IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v98y2013icp319-329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How organizational context affects bioethical decision-making: Pharmacists' management of gatekeeping processes in retail and hospital settings

Author

Listed:
  • Chiarello, Elizabeth

Abstract

Social science studies of bioethics demonstrate that ethics are highly contextual, functioning differently across local settings as actors make daily decisions “on the ground.” Sociological studies that demonstrate the key role organizations play in shaping ethical decision-making have disproportionately focused on physicians and nurses working in hospital settings where they contend with life and death issues. This study broadens our understanding of the contexts of ethical decision-making by empirically examining understudied healthcare professionals – pharmacists – working in two organizational settings, retail and hospital, where they act as gatekeepers to regulated goods and services as they contend with ethical issues ranging from the serious to the mundane. This study asks: How do organizations shape pharmacists' identification, negotiation, and resolution of ethical challenges; in other words, how do organizations shape pharmacists' gatekeeping processes? Based on 95 semi-structured interviews with U.S. pharmacists practicing in retail and hospital pharmacies conducted between September 2009 and May 2011, this research finds that organizations influence ethical decision-making by shaping how pharmacists construct four gatekeeping processes: medical, legal, fiscal, and moral. Each gatekeeping process manifests differently across organizations due to how these settings structure inter-professional power dynamics, proximity to patients, and means of accessing information. Findings suggest new directions for theorizing about ethical decision-making in medical contexts by drawing attention to new ethical actors, new organizational settings, an expanded definition of ethical challenges, and a broader conceptualization of gatekeeping.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiarello, Elizabeth, 2013. "How organizational context affects bioethical decision-making: Pharmacists' management of gatekeeping processes in retail and hospital settings," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 319-329.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:98:y:2013:i:c:p:319-329
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953612008349
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.11.041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bachman, Keith H. & K. Freeborn, Donald, 1999. "HMO physicians' use of referrals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 547-557, February.
    2. Jecker, Nancy S. & Berg, Alfred O., 1992. "Allocating medical resources in rural America: Alternative perceptions of justice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 467-474, March.
    3. MacIntosh, Robert & Beech, Nic & Martin, Graeme, 2012. "Dialogues and dialetics: Limits to clinician–manager interaction in healthcare organizations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(3), pages 332-339.
    4. Kälvemark, Sofia & Höglund, Anna T. & Hansson, Mats G. & Westerholm, Peter & Arnetz, Bengt, 2004. "Living with conflicts-ethical dilemmas and moral distress in the health care system," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(6), pages 1075-1084, March.
    5. Shulman, S.R., 1989. "The broader message of Accutane," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 79(11), pages 1565-1568.
    6. Davidson, Laura A. & Pettis, Clare T. & Joiner, Amber J. & Cook, Daniel M. & Klugman, Craig M., 2010. "Religion and conscientious objection: A survey of pharmacists' willingness to dispense medications," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 161-165, July.
    7. Arber, Sara & McKinlay, John & Adams, Ann & Marceau, Lisa & Link, Carol & O'Donnell, Amy, 2006. "Patient characteristics and inequalities in doctors' diagnostic and management strategies relating to CHD: A video-simulation experiment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 103-115, January.
    8. Riley, Robin & Manias, Elizabeth, 2009. "Gatekeeping practices of nurses in operating rooms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 215-222, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Solheim, I.H. & Moland, K.M. & Kahabuka, C. & Pembe, A.B. & Blystad, A., 2020. "Beyond the law: Misoprostol and medical abortion in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    2. Dobransky, Kerry M., 2020. "Reassessing mental illness stigma in mental health care: Competing stigmas and risk containment," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    3. Puckett, Cassidy & Wong, Jenise C. & Daley, Tanicia C. & Cossen, Kristina, 2020. "How organizations shape medical technology allocation: Insulin pumps and pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    4. Wagner, Brandon G. & Cleland, Kelly & Batur, Pelin & Wu, Justine & Rothberg, Michael B., 2019. "Emergency contraception: Links between providers' counseling choices, prescribing behaviors, and sociopolitical context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. Kushida, Shuya & Kawashima, Michie & Abe, Tetsuya, 2021. "Recommending no further treatment: Gatekeeping work of generalists at a Japanese university hospital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    6. Czarnecki, Danielle & Anspach, Renee R. & De Vries, Raymond G. & Dunn, Mercedez D. & Hauschildt, Katrina & Harris, Lisa H., 2019. "Conscience reconsidered: The moral work of navigating participation in abortion care on labor and delivery," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 181-189.
    7. Piercy, Cameron W. & Gist-Mackey, Angela N., 2022. "Status shields and pharmacy work: Differences among workers by role and context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 293(C).
    8. Baumgart-McFarland, Madison & Chiarello, Elizabeth & Slay, Tayla, 2022. "Reluctant Saviors: Professional ambivalence, cultural imaginaries, and deservingness construction in naloxone provision," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    9. Suh, Siri, 2014. "Rewriting abortion: Deploying medical records in jurisdictional negotiation over a forbidden practice in Senegal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 20-33.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kushida, Shuya & Kawashima, Michie & Abe, Tetsuya, 2021. "Recommending no further treatment: Gatekeeping work of generalists at a Japanese university hospital," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    2. Huang, Nicole & Chou, Yiing-Jenq & Hu, Hsiao-Yun & Lee, Cheng-Hua, 2013. "Gender disparities in AMI management and outcomes among health professionals, their relatives, and non-health professionals in Taiwan from 1997 to 2007," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 70-74.
    3. Perelman, Julian & Mateus, Céu & Fernandes, Ana, 2010. "Gender equity in treatment for cardiac heart disease in Portugal," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 25-29, July.
    4. Wagner, Brandon G. & Cleland, Kelly & Batur, Pelin & Wu, Justine & Rothberg, Michael B., 2019. "Emergency contraception: Links between providers' counseling choices, prescribing behaviors, and sociopolitical context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    5. van Dijk, Christel E. & Korevaar, Joke C. & Koopmans, Berber & de Jong, Judith D. & de Bakker, Dinny H., 2014. "The primary–secondary care interface: Does provision of more services in primary care reduce referrals to medical specialists?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 48-55.
    6. Luca Fumarco & Benjamin Harrell & Patrick Button & David Schwegman & E Dils, 2020. "Gender Identity, Race, and Ethnicity-based Discrimination in Access to Mental Health Care: Evidence from an Audit Correspondence Field Experiment," NBER Working Papers 28164, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Moore, Helen & Gillespie, Alex, 2014. "The caregiving bind: Concealing the demands of informal care can undermine the caregiving identity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 102-109.
    8. Jennifer Rainer & Joanne Kraenzle Schneider & Rebecca A. Lorenz, 2018. "Ethical dilemmas in nursing: An integrative review," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(19-20), pages 3446-3461, October.
    9. Dovidio, John F. & Penner, Louis A. & Albrecht, Terrance L. & Norton, Wynne E. & Gaertner, Samuel L. & Shelton, J. Nicole, 2008. "Disparities and distrust: The implications of psychological processes for understanding racial disparities in health and health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(3), pages 478-486, August.
    10. Xavier Richet, 2012. "Impact and Response to the Financial Crisis: Comparing the EU and China Policies," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 3-15.
    11. Ryan Tandjung & Seraina Morell & Andreas Hanhart & Andreas Haefeli & Fabio Valeri & Thomas Rosemann & Oliver Senn, 2017. "Referral determinants in Swiss primary care with a special focus on managed care," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-10, November.
    12. Jolanki, Outi & Tynkkynen, Liina-Kaisa, 2018. "Primary health care nurses’ views on patients’ abilities and resources to make choices and take decisions on health care," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 122(9), pages 957-962.
    13. Devendra Potnis & Macy Halladay, 2022. "Information practices of administrators for controlling information in an online community of new mothers in rural America," Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, vol. 73(11), pages 1621-1640, November.
    14. Ballering, Aranka V. & Bonvanie, Irma J. & Olde Hartman, Tim C. & Monden, Rei & Rosmalen, Judith G.M., 2020. "Gender and sex independently associate with common somatic symptoms and lifetime prevalence of chronic disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    15. Brazil, Kevin & Kassalainen, Sharon & Ploeg, Jenny & Marshall, Denise, 2010. "Moral distress experienced by health care professionals who provide home-based palliative care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(9), pages 1687-1691, November.
    16. Caro, Francis G. & Yee, Christine & Levien, Samantha & Gottlieb, Alison S. & Winter, Joachim & McFadden, Daniel L. & Ho, Teck H., 2012. "Choosing among residential options: Results of a vignette experiment," Munich Reprints in Economics 19970, University of Munich, Department of Economics.
    17. Thomas Höge & Cornelia Strecker & Melanie Hausler & Alexandra Huber & Stefan Höfer, 2020. "Perceived Socio-moral Climate and the Applicability of Signature Character Strengths at Work: a Study among Hospital Physicians," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 15(2), pages 463-484, April.
    18. Ulrich, Connie & O'Donnell, Patricia & Taylor, Carol & Farrar, Adrienne & Danis, Marion & Grady, Christine, 2007. "Ethical climate, ethics stress, and the job satisfaction of nurses and social workers in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(8), pages 1708-1719, October.
    19. Kelly-Irving, Michelle & Delpierre, Cyrille & Schieber, Anne-Cécile & Lepage, Benoit & Rolland, Christine & Afrité, Anissa & Pascal, Jean & Cases, Chantal & Lombrail, Pierre & Lang, Thierry, 2011. "Do general practitioners overestimate the health of their patients with lower education?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(9), pages 1416-1421.
    20. Jacob DAMMAND & Mads HORLYCK & Thomas Lyngholm JACOBSEN & Rainer LUEG & Rasmus Laygardt RÖCK, 2014. "Lean management in hospitals: Evidence from Denmark," REVISTA ADMINISTRATIE SI MANAGEMENT PUBLIC, Faculty of Administration and Public Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 2014(23), pages 19-35, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:98:y:2013:i:c:p:319-329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.