IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v73y2011i12p1741-1747.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"The Most Important Test You’ll Ever Take"?: Attitudes toward confidential carrier matching and open individual testing among modern-religious Jews in Israel

Author

Listed:
  • Frumkin, Ayala
  • Raz, Aviad E.
  • Plesser-Duvdevani, Morasha
  • Lieberman, Sari

Abstract

This article reports on attitudes of modern-religious Ashkenazi Jewish adults in Israel toward anonymous carrier matching for severe monogenic diseases by Dor Yesharim (the ultra-orthodox organization) and open individual carrier testing (through a medical center), examining how this important choice is being informed, communicated, made, and reflected on. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews conducted with 23 modern-religious Ashkenazi Jews in 2009–2011 revealed social pressure to utilize Dor Yesharim; however, respondents considered its policy of advising against a marriage between partners who are carriers of the same genetic condition inappropriate for ’love marriages’ where a couple’s commitment may already be made. Confidential carrier testing was a stepping stone to open carrier testing for those advised not to marry. Respondents varied in their views on when open carrier tests should be conducted. Pre-implantation genetic diagnosis was considered religiously preferable to abortion; however most carrier couples opted for pre-natal testing and selective abortion, challenging stereotypes about the attitudes of religious Jews. It is discussed how carrier screening is contextualized and interpreted not just in terms of religious teachings, but in interaction with lay agency, personal experiences and knowledge of reproductive choices. We conclude by discussing the implications for the social analysis of the ethics of carrier screening in religious communities at risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Frumkin, Ayala & Raz, Aviad E. & Plesser-Duvdevani, Morasha & Lieberman, Sari, 2011. ""The Most Important Test You’ll Ever Take"?: Attitudes toward confidential carrier matching and open individual testing among modern-religious Jews in Israel," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(12), pages 1741-1747.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:73:y:2011:i:12:p:1741-1747
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953611006034
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.09.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna, 2009. "The politics of 'The Natural Family' in Israel: State policy and kinship ideologies," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(7), pages 1018-1024, October.
    2. Raz, Aviad E. & Vizner, Yafa, 2008. "Carrier matching and collective socialization in community genetics: Dor Yeshorim and the reinforcement of stigma," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(9), pages 1361-1369, November.
    3. Shaw, Alison, 2011. "Risk and reproductive decisions: British Pakistani couples' responses to genetic counselling," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(1), pages 111-120, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Inhorn, Marcia C. & Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna & Vale, Mira D. & Patrizio, Pasquale, 2020. "Abrahamic traditions and egg freezing: Religious Women's experiences in local moral worlds," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    2. Thorsten Janus, 2013. "The political economy of fertility," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 493-505, June.
    3. doctorants Ined, 2015. "Actes de la Journée Doctorale de l’Ined - 2015," Working Papers 219, Institut National d'Études Démographiques (INED).
    4. Ivry, Tsipy & Teman, Elly & Frumkin, Ayala, 2011. "God-sent ordeals and their discontents: Ultra-orthodox Jewish women negotiate prenatal testing," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(9), pages 1527-1533, May.
    5. Maya Tsfati & Dorit Segal-Engelchin, 2022. "The Social Experiences of Single Gay Fathers in Israel: An Intersectional Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:73:y:2011:i:12:p:1741-1747. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.