IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v70y2010i5p787-793.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceived justice and popular support for public health laws: A case study around comprehensive smoke-free legislation in Mexico City

Author

Listed:
  • Thrasher, James F.
  • Besley, John C.
  • González, Wendy

Abstract

The World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control promotes comprehensive smoke-free laws. The effective implementation of these laws requires citizen participation and support. Risk communication research suggests that citizens' perceptions of the fairness of smoke-free laws would help explain their support for the law. This study aimed to assess the factors that correlate with citizens' perceptions of the distributive, procedural and interpersonal justice of smoke-free laws, as well as how these perceptions are related to support for and intention to help enforce these laws. Study data came from a cross-sectional, population-based survey of 800 Mexico City inhabitants before a comprehensive smoke-free policy was implemented there in 2008. Structural equation modeling was used to estimate the bivariate and multivariate adjusted paths relating study variables. In the final multivariate model, the three justice concepts mediated the influence of smoking status, perceived dangers of secondhand smoke exposure, strength of home smoking ban, and perceived rights of smokers on the two distal constructs of support for smoke-free policy and intention to help enforce it. Statistically significant paths were estimated from distributive and procedural justice to support for the law and intention help enforce it. The path from interpersonal justice to support for the law was not significant, but the path to intention to help enforce the law was. Finally, the path from support for the law to the intention to enforce it was statistically significant. These results suggest that three distinct dimensions of perceived justice help explain citizen support for smoke-free policies. These dimensions of perceived justice may explain the conditions under which smoke-free policies are effectively implemented and could help shape the focus for communication strategies that aim to ensure effective implementation of this and other public health policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Thrasher, James F. & Besley, John C. & González, Wendy, 2010. "Perceived justice and popular support for public health laws: A case study around comprehensive smoke-free legislation in Mexico City," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(5), pages 787-793, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:5:p:787-793
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(09)00787-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tang, H. & Cowling, D.W. & Lloyd, J.C. & Rogers, T. & Koumjian, K.L. & Stevens, C.M. & Bal, D.G., 2003. "Changes of attitudes and patronage behaviors in response to a smoke-free bar law," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(4), pages 611-617.
    2. Brooks, D.R. & Mucci, L.A., 2001. "Support for smoke-free restaurants among Massachusetts adults, 1992-1999," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(2), pages 300-303.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. John C Besley & Aaron M McCright & Nagwan R Zahry & Kevin C Elliott & Norbert E Kaminski & Joseph D Martin, 2017. "Perceived conflict of interest in health science partnerships," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(4), pages 1-20, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reichmann, Gerhard & Sommersguter-Reichmann, Margit, 2012. "The Austrian Tobacco Act in practice – Analysing the effectiveness of partial smoking bans in Austrian restaurants and bars," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 104(3), pages 304-311.
    2. Kelly, Brian C. & Vuolo, Mike & Frizzell, Laura C. & Hernandez, Elaine M., 2018. "Denormalization, smoke-free air policy, and tobacco use among young adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 70-77.
    3. Nykiforuk, Candace & Campbell, Sharon & Cameron, Roy & Brown, Stephen & Eyles, John, 2007. "Relationships between community characteristics and municipal smoke-free bylaw status and strength," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 358-368, February.
    4. Francis, Andrew M. & Mialon, Hugo M. & Peng, Handie, 2012. "In sickness and in health: Same-sex marriage laws and sexually transmitted infections," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(8), pages 1329-1341.
    5. Ljudevit Pranić & Snježana Pivac, 2016. "Effects of a partial smoking ban on employees' post-implementation perceptions and job satisfaction in cafes vs. restaurants in Croatia," Tourism and Hospitality Industry 26, University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management.
    6. Michael R. Pakko, 2006. "On the economic analysis of smoking bans," Regional Economic Development, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, issue Oct, pages 115-130.
    7. Kerry O’Brien & Walter Forrest & Dermot Lynott & Michael Daly, 2013. "Racism, Gun Ownership and Gun Control: Biased Attitudes in US Whites May Influence Policy Decisions," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(10), pages 1-10, October.
    8. Valentina Minardi & Giuseppe Gorini & Giulia Carreras & Maria Masocco & Gianluigi Ferrante & Valentina Possenti & Elisa Quarchioni & Lorenzo Spizzichino & Daniela Galeone & Stefania Vasselli & Stefani, 2014. "Compliance with the smoking ban in Italy 8 years after its application," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(3), pages 549-554, June.
    9. Smith, Katherine Clegg & Siebel, Catherine & Pham, Luu & Cho, Juhee & Singer, Rachel Friedman & Chaloupka, Frank Joseph & Griswold, Michael & Wakefield, Melanie, 2008. "News on tobacco and public attitudes toward smokefree air policies in the United States," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(1), pages 42-52, April.
    10. Jennifer W. Kahende & Brett R. Loomis & Bishwa Adhikari & LaTisha Marshall, 2008. "A Review of Economic Evaluations of Tobacco Control Programs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-18, December.
    11. Kotsadam, Andreas & Jakobsson, Niklas, 2011. "Do laws affect attitudes? An assessment of the Norwegian prostitution law using longitudinal data," International Review of Law and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 103-115, June.
    12. Neil E. Klepeis & Narinder Dhaliwal & Gary Hayward & Viviana Acevedo-Bolton & Wayne R. Ott & Nathan Read & Steve Layton & Ruoting Jiang & Kai-Chung Cheng & Lynn M. Hildemann & James L. Repace & Stepha, 2016. "Measuring Indoor Air Quality and Engaging California Indian Stakeholders at the Win-River Resort and Casino: Collaborative Smoke-Free Policy Development," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-26, January.
    13. Ljudevit Pranic & Snjezana Pivac & Anela Colak, 2013. "Cafe Owners Attitudes Before The Enactment Of A Smoke-Free Legislation In Transition Countries," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 22(1), pages 57-78, june.
    14. Rebekah R Rhoades & Laura A Beebe & Nasir Mushtaq, 2019. "Support for Local Tobacco Policy in a Preemptive State," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-16, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:70:y:2010:i:5:p:787-793. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.