IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v69y2009i8p1228-1235.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

"Someone's rooting for you": Continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare

Author

Listed:
  • Finlay, Susanna
  • Sandall, Jane

Abstract

Continuity and advocacy are widely held to be important elements in maternal healthcare, yet they are often lacking from the care women receive. In order to understand this disparity, we draw upon interviews and ethnographic observational findings from The One-to-One Caseload Project, a study exploring the impacts of a caseload model of maternity care within an urban National Health Service provider in Britain. Drawing on Lipsky's (1980) and Prottas's (1979) theories of street-level bureaucracy, this paper attempts to understand how midwives, working on the frontline within caseload and standard care models, manage the competing demands of delivering a personalised service within a bureaucratic organisation. The caseload care model serves as a case study for how a client-centred model of working can assist street-level bureaucrats to manage the administrative pressures of public service organisations and provide their clients with a personalised, responsive service. Nevertheless, despite such benefits, client-centred models of working may have unintended consequences for both health carers and healthcare systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Finlay, Susanna & Sandall, Jane, 2009. ""Someone's rooting for you": Continuity, advocacy and street-level bureaucracy in UK maternal healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 1228-1235, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:69:y:2009:i:8:p:1228-1235
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(09)00489-4
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Walsh, Denis, 2006. "Subverting the assembly-line: Childbirth in a free-standing birth centre," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1330-1340, March.
    2. Walker, Liz & Gilson, Lucy, 2004. "'We are bitter but we are satisfied': nurses as street-level bureaucrats in South Africa," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(6), pages 1251-1261, September.
    3. Goold, Susan Dorr & Klipp, Glenn, 2002. "Managed care members talk about trust," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 879-888, March.
    4. Foley, Ronan & Platzer, Hazel, 2007. "Place and provision: Mapping mental health advocacy services in London," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(3), pages 617-632, February.
    5. Armstrong, David, 1985. "Space and time in British general practice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 20(7), pages 659-666, January.
    6. McCourt, Christine, 2006. "Supporting choice and control? Communication and interaction between midwives and women at the antenatal booking visit," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(6), pages 1307-1318, March.
    7. Bramesfeld, Anke & Klippel, Ulrike & Seidel, Gabriele & Schwartz, Friedrich W. & Dierks, Marie-Luise, 2007. "How do patients expect the mental health service system to act? Testing the WHO responsiveness concept for its appropriateness in mental health care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(5), pages 880-889, September.
    8. McLean, Athena, 1995. "Empowerment and the psychiatric consumer/ex-patient movement in the United States: Contradictions, crisis and change," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(8), pages 1053-1071, April.
    9. Woodward, Christel A. & Abelson, Julia & Tedford, Sara & Hutchison, Brian, 2004. "What is important to continuity in home care?: Perspectives of key stakeholders," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(1), pages 177-192, January.
    10. Mechanic, David & Meyer, Sharon, 2000. "Concepts of trust among patients with serious illness," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 657-668, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Changkun Cai & Qiyao Shen & Na Tang, 2022. "Do visiting monks give better sermons? “Street‐level bureaucrats from higher‐up” in targeted poverty alleviation in China," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 42(1), pages 55-71, February.
    2. Vestering, Asra & de Kok, Bregje C. & Browne, Joyce L. & Adu-Bonsaffoh, Kwame, 2021. "Navigating with logics: Care for women with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy in a tertiary hospital in Ghana," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 289(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gilson, Lucy & Palmer, Natasha & Schneider, Helen, 2005. "Trust and health worker performance: exploring a conceptual framework using South African evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(7), pages 1418-1429, October.
    2. Li, Mingqiang & Li, Zhihui & Yip, Chi-Man (Winnie), 2022. "Informal payments and patients’ perceptions of the physician agency problem: Evidence from rural China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 298(C).
    3. Valéry Ridde & Seni Kouanda & Aristide Bado & Nicole Bado & Slim Haddad, 2012. "Reducing the Medical Cost of Deliveries in Burkina Faso Is Good for Everyone, Including the Poor," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 7(3), pages 1-8, March.
    4. Smirnova, Michelle & Owens, Jennifer Gatewood, 2017. "Medicalized addiction, self-medication, or nonmedical prescription drug use? How trust figures into incarcerated women's conceptualization of illicit prescription drug use," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 106-115.
    5. Stasiulis, Elaine & Gibson, Barbara E. & Webster, Fiona & Boydell, Katherine M., 2020. "Resisting governance and the production of trust in early psychosis intervention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    6. Koyuncu, Işıl & Yavuz, Mesut, 2019. "Duplicating nodes or arcs in green vehicle routing: A computational comparison of two formulations," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 605-623.
    7. Zeytinoglu, Isik U. & Denton, Margaret & Brookman, Catherine & Plenderleith, Jennifer, 2014. "Task shifting policy in Ontario, Canada: Does it help personal support workers’ intention to stay?," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 117(2), pages 179-186.
    8. Adams, Wallis E., 2020. "Unintended consequences of institutionalizing peer support work in mental healthcare," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    9. Groenewegen, Peter P. & Hansen, Johan & de Jong, Judith D., 2019. "Trust in times of health reform," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 123(3), pages 281-287.
    10. Ozawa, Sachiko & Sripad, Pooja, 2013. "How do you measure trust in the health system? A systematic review of the literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 10-14.
    11. Agyepong, Irene Akua & Nagai, Richard A., 2011. ""We charge them; otherwise we cannot run the hospital" front line workers, clients and health financing policy implementation gaps in Ghana," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 226-233, March.
    12. Steven F. Koch & Jeffrey S. Racine, 2016. "Healthcare facility choice and user fee abolition: regression discontinuity in a multinomial choice setting," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 179(4), pages 927-950, October.
    13. Yang, Meng & Ni, Yaodong & Song, Qinyu, 2022. "Optimizing driver consistency in the vehicle routing problem under uncertain environment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    14. Overgaard, Charlotte & Fenger-Grøn, Morten & Sandall, Jane, 2012. "The impact of birthplace on women’s birth experiences and perceptions of care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 74(7), pages 973-981.
    15. Steven F. Koch, 2017. "User Fee Abolition and the Demand for Public Health Care," South African Journal of Economics, Economic Society of South Africa, vol. 85(2), pages 242-258, June.
    16. Carla Treloar & Rebecca Gray & Loren Brener & Clair Jackson & Veronica Saunders & Priscilla Johnson & Magdalena Harris & Phyllis Butow & Christy Newman, 2014. "“I can’t do this, it’s too much”: building social inclusion in cancer diagnosis and treatment experiences of Aboriginal people, their carers and health workers," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 59(2), pages 373-379, April.
    17. Rosemary Mander & Ngai Fen Cheung & Xiaoli Wang & Wei Fu & Junghong Zhu, 2010. "Beginning an action research project to investigate the feasibility of a midwife‐led normal birthing unit in China," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3‐4), pages 517-526, February.
    18. Roxanne J. Kovacs & Mylene Lagarde & John Cairns, 2019. "Measuring patient trust: Comparing measures from a survey and an economic experiment," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 28(5), pages 641-652, May.
    19. Atinga, Roger A. & Agyepong, Irene Akua & Esena, Reuben K., 2018. "Ghana's community-based primary health care: Why women and children are ‘disadvantaged’ by its implementation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 201(C), pages 27-34.
    20. Ejemai Amaize Eboreime & John Eyles & Nonhlanhla Nxumalo & Oghenekome Lauretta Eboreime & Rohit Ramaswamy, 2019. "Implementation process and quality of a primary health care system improvement initiative in a decentralized context: A retrospective appraisal using the quality implementation framework," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 369-386, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:69:y:2009:i:8:p:1228-1235. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.