IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v69y2009i5p678-681.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Experimental emotional disclosure in women undergoing infertility treatment: Are drop outs better off?

Author

Listed:
  • Panagopoulou, Efharis
  • Montgomery, Anthony
  • Tarlatzis, Basil

Abstract

So far, the beneficial effects of personal written emotional disclosure have been mainly examined in relation to past or current stressful/traumatic experiences. The anticipation of a medical event has rarely been studied within this paradigm. This randomized-controlled study examined whether written emotional disclosure would reduce emotional distress and increase pregnancy rates in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization treatment. Participants recruited from women who were undergoing IVF in the north of Greece (n = 148) were randomized to an emotional-writing condition, a fact-writing condition and a control condition. Outcomes included fertility-related distress, general distress and a positive indication of pregnancy. Psychological and medical information about women who refused to participate were also collected, and this represented a fourth group for analysis (n = 66). Results indicated no significant difference between groups in terms of emotional distress. However, a significant difference was observed with regard to pregnancy results, with the non-participants group reporting the highest percentage of pregnancies. The present study did not support the hypotheses that emotional disclosure will reduce infertility-related or general psychological distress and improve pregnancy outcomes in women undergoing in-vitro fertilization treatment. However, women who refused to participate in the study were more likely to get pregnant. Differences in the beneficial effects of emotional disclosure are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Panagopoulou, Efharis & Montgomery, Anthony & Tarlatzis, Basil, 2009. "Experimental emotional disclosure in women undergoing infertility treatment: Are drop outs better off?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(5), pages 678-681, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:69:y:2009:i:5:p:678-681
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(09)00401-8
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benyou Chen, 2014. "Review on the Self-Disclosure of Visitors," Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(2), pages 1-94, November.
    2. Anna Wendołowska & Ewa Kiełek-Rataj & Alicja Kalus & Dorota Czyżowska, 2022. "Perceived Partner’s Self-Control and Social Support Effects on Relationship Satisfaction in Couples Experiencing Infertility or Miscarriage: Dyadic Analyses," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Ewa Kiełek-Rataj & Anna Wendołowska & Alicja Kalus & Dorota Czyżowska, 2020. "Openness and Communication Effects on Relationship Satisfaction in Women Experiencing Infertility or Miscarriage: A Dyadic Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-20, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:69:y:2009:i:5:p:678-681. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.