IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v69y2009i2p147-153.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Extending specialist palliative care to people with heart failure: Semantic, historical and practical limitations to policy guidelines

Author

Listed:
  • Chattoo, Sangeeta
  • Atkin, Karl M.

Abstract

This paper explores the continuities and discontinuities in recent policy on the extension of palliative care to people with heart failure in the UK. It focuses on how professionals in cardiology and specialist palliative care negotiate their disciplinary boundaries within the context of these policy moves. It draws out the semantic, historical and practical tensions between the core values of cardiology, with its focus on 'living with heart failure', and specialist palliative medicine, with its focus on 'dying with heart failure'. A focus on negotiation of interdisciplinary boundaries reveals different engagements with notions of dying and palliation rather than simply different disease trajectories. Further, uncertainty about prognosis and the probability of sudden death pose a challenge to two core principles of specialist palliative care: 'open awareness' and 'good death'. We are not suggesting that these differences are insurmountable. Rather, in highlighting these tensions, our aim is to problematise the relationship between policy and practice, as being mediated by negotiations of disciplinary values (culture) within a local context. We conclude by recommending a wider discussion on notions of 'open awareness' and how professionals within different medical disciplines engage with alternate ways of dealing with uncertainty and sudden death as part of human condition. The arguments presented here are based on data and analysis from a larger qualitative study conducted during 2004-2005 in north and central England.

Suggested Citation

  • Chattoo, Sangeeta & Atkin, Karl M., 2009. "Extending specialist palliative care to people with heart failure: Semantic, historical and practical limitations to policy guidelines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 147-153, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:69:y:2009:i:2:p:147-153
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(09)00109-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. DelVecchio Good, Mary-Jo & Gadmer, Nina M. & Ruopp, Patricia & Lakoma, Matthew & Sullivan, Amy M. & Redinbaugh, Ellen & Arnold, Robert M. & Block, Susan D., 2004. "Narrative nuances on good and bad deaths: internists' tales from high-technology work places," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(5), pages 939-953, March.
    2. Hibbert, Derek & Hanratty, Barbara & May, Carl & Mair, Frances & Litva, Andrea & Capewell, Simon, 2003. "Negotiating palliative care expertise in the medical world," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(2), pages 277-288, July.
    3. James, Nicky & Field, David, 1992. "The routinization of hospice: Charisma and bureaucratization," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 34(12), pages 1363-1375, June.
    4. Seale, Clive F., 1989. "What happens in hospices: A review of research evidence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(6), pages 551-559, January.
    5. Clark, David, 1999. "'Total pain', disciplinary power and the body in the work of Cicely Saunders, 1958-1967," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 727-736, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Whitelaw, Sandy & Bell, Anthony & Clark, David, 2022. "The expression of ‘policy’ in palliative care: A critical review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 889-898.
    2. Zimmermann, Camilla, 2012. "Acceptance of dying: A discourse analysis of palliative care literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 217-224.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Patrícia Hilário & Fábio Rafael Augusto, 2022. "Pathways for a ‘Good Death’: Understanding End-of-Life Practices Through An Ethnographic Study in Two Portuguese Palliative Care Units," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(2), pages 219-235, June.
    2. Cohen, Joachim & Marcoux, Isabelle & Bilsen, Johan & Deboosere, Patrick & van der Wal, Gerrit & Deliens, Luc, 2006. "European public acceptance of euthanasia: Socio-demographic and cultural factors associated with the acceptance of euthanasia in 33 European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 743-756, August.
    3. Zimmermann, Camilla, 2012. "Acceptance of dying: A discourse analysis of palliative care literature," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 75(1), pages 217-224.
    4. Karsoho, Hadi & Fishman, Jennifer R. & Wright, David Kenneth & Macdonald, Mary Ellen, 2016. "Suffering and medicalization at the end of life: The case of physician-assisted dying," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 188-196.
    5. Broom, Alex & Kirby, Emma & Good, Phillip & Wootton, Julia & Adams, Jon, 2013. "The art of letting go: Referral to palliative care and its discontents," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 9-16.
    6. Lang, Alexander, 2020. "The good death and the institutionalisation of dying: An interpretive analysis of the Austrian discourse," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    7. Broom, Alex & Cavenagh, John, 2010. "Masculinity, moralities and being cared for: An exploration of experiences of living and dying in a hospice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 869-876, September.
    8. Peretti-Watel, P. & Bendiane, M.K. & Moatti, J.P., 2005. "Attitudes toward palliative care, conceptions of euthanasia and opinions about its legalization among French physicians," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(8), pages 1781-1793, April.
    9. Kathy Charmaz & Virginia Olesen, 1997. "Ethnographic Research in Medical Sociology," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 25(4), pages 452-494, May.
    10. Martin, Graham P. & Currie, Graeme & Finn, Rachael, 2009. "Reconfiguring or reproducing intra-professional boundaries? Specialist expertise, generalist knowledge and the 'modernization' of the medical workforce," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 1191-1198, April.
    11. Whitelaw, Sandy & Bell, Anthony & Clark, David, 2022. "The expression of ‘policy’ in palliative care: A critical review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(9), pages 889-898.
    12. Collins, Molly E. & Block, Susan D. & Arnold, Robert M. & Christakis, Nicholas A., 2009. "On the prospects for a blame-free medical culture," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1287-1290, November.
    13. van Beinum, Amanda & Hornby, Laura & Scales, Nathan & Shemie, Sam D. & Dhanani, Sonny, 2022. "Autoresuscitation and clinical authority in death determination using circulatory criteria," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 301(C).
    14. Duberstein, Paul R. & Hoerger, Michael & Norton, Sally A. & Mohile, Supriya & Dahlberg, Britt & Hyatt, Erica Goldblatt & Epstein, Ronald M. & Wittink, Marsha N., 2023. "The TRIBE model: How socioemotional processes fuel end-of-life treatment in the United States," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 317(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:69:y:2009:i:2:p:147-153. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.