IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v49y1999i6p727-736.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

'Total pain', disciplinary power and the body in the work of Cicely Saunders, 1958-1967

Author

Listed:
  • Clark, David

Abstract

Pain first emerged as an area of clinical specialisation in the 1950s, but more recently has attracted wider interest from social scientists and clinicians who seek to expand its understanding to incorporate ideas about meaning, embodiment and culture. So far there have been few empirical studies which focus on how ideas and practices about pain are changing in modern healthcare. This paper addresses these issues through a specific case study of the early writings of Cicely Saunders in the period 1958-1967. A professional training in the three disciplines of nursing, social work and medicine, coupled with a strong personal religious faith, provided the biographical context for the development of Cicely Saunders' concern with pain. Through these influences we find in her work with dying patients an emphasis on pain as a key which unlocks other problems and as something which requires multiple interventions for its resolution. From here the concept of 'total pain' is formulated, to include physical, psychological, social, emotional and spiritual elements. This concept, which proved so important to the development of hospice clinical practice, is shown to have paradoxical and conflicting implications. Adopting current ideas about the social theory of the body, 'total pain' may be formulated either as a nomenclature of inscription, or as a nomenclature of facilitation. It is suggested that both of these may be at work in the discourse of 'total pain' and that an appreciation of each enhances our understanding of the concept.

Suggested Citation

  • Clark, David, 1999. "'Total pain', disciplinary power and the body in the work of Cicely Saunders, 1958-1967," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(6), pages 727-736, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:6:p:727-736
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(99)00098-2
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Karsoho, Hadi & Fishman, Jennifer R. & Wright, David Kenneth & Macdonald, Mary Ellen, 2016. "Suffering and medicalization at the end of life: The case of physician-assisted dying," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 188-196.
    2. Ana Patrícia Hilário & Fábio Rafael Augusto, 2022. "Pathways for a ‘Good Death’: Understanding End-of-Life Practices Through An Ethnographic Study in Two Portuguese Palliative Care Units," Sociological Research Online, , vol. 27(2), pages 219-235, June.
    3. Chattoo, Sangeeta & Atkin, Karl M., 2009. "Extending specialist palliative care to people with heart failure: Semantic, historical and practical limitations to policy guidelines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(2), pages 147-153, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:49:y:1999:i:6:p:727-736. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.