IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v68y2009i6p1129-1136.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Public ideas and values concerning the commercialization of organ donation in four European countries

Author

Listed:
  • Schweda, Mark
  • Schicktanz, Silke

Abstract

Against the background of the increasing academic and political debate on financial incentives for organ donation, we conducted a qualitative investigation on the conditions under which European citizens would actually consider or refuse financial incentives for organ donation. Our paper combines an analysis of data that were collected in eight Focus Group discussions on transplantation medicine with lay people and patients from four European countries (Cyprus, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden) with a critical re-assessment of the dichotomy between gift and commodity in the recent political and academic discourse. We find that the distinction between living and post mortem donation on the one hand, and between different models of financial incentives on the other, plays a crucial role for the participants' values and ideas about organ donation. We discuss the significance of our results with particular respect to the central role of reciprocity and draw conclusions for the bioethical and biopolitical debate.

Suggested Citation

  • Schweda, Mark & Schicktanz, Silke, 2009. "Public ideas and values concerning the commercialization of organ donation in four European countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1129-1136, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:68:y:2009:i:6:p:1129-1136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(08)00671-0
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Horton, Raymond L. & Horton, Patricia J., 1991. "A model of willingness to become a potential organ donor," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 33(9), pages 1037-1051, January.
    2. Siminoff, Laura A. & Burant, Christopher & Youngner, Stuart J., 2004. "Death and organ procurement: public beliefs and attitudes," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(11), pages 2325-2334, December.
    3. Mocan, Naci & Tekin, Erdal, 2007. "The determinants of the willingness to donate an organ among young adults: Evidence from the United States and the European Union," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(12), pages 2527-2538, December.
    4. Sanner, Margareta A., 2001. "Exchanging spare parts or becoming a new person? People's attitudes toward receiving and donating organs," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 52(10), pages 1491-1499, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Long, Yan, 2022. "Selling under stigma: The relational gender dynamics of becoming biolaborers in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    2. van Dalen, Hendrik P. & Henkens, Kène, 2014. "Comparing the effects of defaults in organ donation systems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 137-142.
    3. Coppen, Remco & Friele, Roland D. & van der Zee, Jouke & Gevers, Sjef K., 2010. "The potential of legislation on organ donation to increase the supply of donor organs," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(2-3), pages 164-170, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oreg, Ayelet, 2019. "Milk donation after losing one's baby: Adopting a donor identity as a means of coping with loss," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Verheijde, Joseph L. & Rady, Mohamed Y. & McGregor, Joan L. & Friederich-Murray, Catherine, 2009. "Enforcement of presumed-consent policy and willingness to donate organs as identified in the European Union Survey: The role of legislation in reinforcing ideology in pluralistic societies," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 26-31, April.
    3. Frohwirth, Lori & Moore, Ann M. & Maniaci, Renata, 2013. "Perceptions of susceptibility to pregnancy among U.S. women obtaining abortions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 18-26.
    4. Cosse, Thomas J. & Weisenberger, Terry M., 2000. "Words versus Actions about Organ Donation: A Four-Year Tracking Study of Attitudes and Self-Reported Behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 50(3), pages 297-303, December.
    5. repec:cup:judgdm:v:13:y:2018:i:5:p:441-450 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Selina Schulze Spüntrup, 2023. "Does Implementing Opt-Out Solve The Organ Shortage Problem? Evidence from a Synthetic Control Approach," ifo Working Paper Series 403, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    7. Han, Hua-Jing & Wibral, Matthias, 2020. "Organ donation and reciprocity," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    8. Jacek Bogucki & Wioletta Tuszyńska-Bogucka, 2023. "‘ Be the Match ’. Predictors of Decisions Concerning Registration as a Potential Bone Marrow Donor—A Psycho-Socio-Demographic Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-14, May.
    9. Alzuabi, Raslan & Brown, Sarah & Taylor, Karl, 2022. "Charitable behaviour and political affiliation: Evidence for the UK," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    10. Donal McGlade & Carol McClenahan & Barbara Pierscionek, 2014. "Pro-Donation Behaviours of Nursing Students from the Four Countries of the UK," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(3), pages 1-6, March.
    11. Kranenburg, Leonieke W. & Kerssens, Chantal & Ijzermans, Jan N.M. & Zuidema, Willij & Weimar, Willem & Busschbach, Jan J.V., 2005. "Reluctant acceptance of xenotransplantation in kidney patients on the waiting list for transplantation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 1828-1834, October.
    12. Maria del Mar Lomero & María F. Jiménez‐Herrera & Maria José Rasero & Alberto Sandiumenge, 2017. "Nurses' attitudes and knowledge regarding organ and tissue donation and transplantation in a provincial hospital: A descriptive and multivariate analysis," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(3), pages 322-330, September.
    13. van Dalen, Hendrik P. & Henkens, Kène, 2014. "Comparing the effects of defaults in organ donation systems," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 137-142.
    14. Long, Tracy & Sque, Magi & Addington-Hall, Julia, 2008. "Conflict rationalisation: How family members cope with a diagnosis of brain stem death," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(2), pages 253-261, July.
    15. Bailey, Phillippa K. & Ben-Shlomo, Yoav & de Salis, Isabel & Tomson, Charles & Owen-Smith, Amanda, 2016. "Better the donor you know? A qualitative study of renal patients' views on ‘altruistic’ live-donor kidney transplantation," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 104-111.
    16. Paul Rozin & Christopher Dunn & Natalie Fedotova, 2018. "Reversing the causal arrow: Incidence and properties of negative backward magical contagion in Americans," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 13(5), pages 441-450, September.
    17. Reubsaet, A. & Brug, J. & Nijkamp, M.D. & Candel, M.J.J.M. & Hooff, J.P. van & Borne, H.W. van den, 2005. "The impact of an organ donation registration information program for high school students in the Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(7), pages 1479-1486, April.
    18. Amy J. Wotring & Timothy R. Jordan & Barbara Saltzman & Tavis Glassman & Jennifer Holloway & Jagdish Khubchandani, 2022. "Why Do Young Adults in the United States Have Such Low Rates of Organ Donation Registration?," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:68:y:2009:i:6:p:1129-1136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.