IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v66y2008i3p784-789.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patient-physician communication barriers regarding fertility preservation among newly diagnosed cancer patients

Author

Listed:
  • Quinn, Gwendolyn P.
  • Vadaparampil, Susan T.
  • Bell-Ellison, Bethany A.
  • Gwede, Clement K.
  • Albrecht, Terrance L.

Abstract

With cancer survival rates increasing, new directions have focused on issues of survivorship, with an intense focus on quality of life. One area gaining increased attention is fertility preservation and future parenthood among cancer survivors. Although medical options for fertility preservation exist, most are not well understood by physicians, patients and family members, and are not readily accessible to patients and their health care providers. This paper discusses the current difficulties in communicating information about fertility preservation in the United States. Physician level of knowledge about fertility preservation, attitudes and comfort level with the topics, patient preferences, and financial and practice barriers may serve as obstacles in the communication process. Social, interaction and behavioral research studies are well poised to address the communication barriers and provide possible solutions to problems in understanding fertility preservation, for patients, family members and health care providers alike.

Suggested Citation

  • Quinn, Gwendolyn P. & Vadaparampil, Susan T. & Bell-Ellison, Bethany A. & Gwede, Clement K. & Albrecht, Terrance L., 2008. "Patient-physician communication barriers regarding fertility preservation among newly diagnosed cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(3), pages 784-789, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:3:p:784-789
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00499-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aakrati Mathur & E. Robert Orellana & Amy Frohnmayer & Pauline Jivanjee & Lillian Nail & Brandon Hayes-Lattin & Rebecca G. Block, 2013. "Patients’ Perception of Patient–Provider Communication in Fertility Preservation Decision Making Among Young Women With Cancer," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(3), pages 21582440135, September.
    2. Inhorn, Marcia C. & Birenbaum-Carmeli, Daphna & Patrizio, Pasquale, 2017. "Medical egg freezing and cancer patients’ hopes: Fertility preservation at the intersection of life and death," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 25-33.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:3:p:784-789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.