IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v66y2008i12p2562-2572.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Brittle bones, pain and fractures - Lay constructions of osteoporosis among Norwegian women attending the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT)

Author

Listed:
  • Skolbekken, John-Arne
  • Østerlie, Wenche
  • Forsmo, Siri

Abstract

Osteoporosis has been labelled the disease of the 21st century. Over the past couple of centuries there have been various notions of this disease in medicine. In the present medical discourse, the emphasis is on prevention rather than treatment, making osteoporosis into a major risk factor for bone fractures. In Norway, osteoporosis is a particularly prevalent condition, leading to bone mass measurements being included in several large health surveys. In a follow-up study of the second round of the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT), women aged 55-75 years were invited to participate in focus groups to talk about their experiences in relation to their bone density measurements. Findings from these focus groups show that osteoporosis is perceived as a disease characterized by brittle bones, pain and fractures. The physical appearance of a hunchbacked old woman is a dominant way of portraying the disease. It is mainly perceived as prevalent among women, but evidence that men can get it is provided through the example of a famous male athlete who became osteoporotic. Causal explanations for the disease are dominated by culturally shaped anecdotal evidence wherein medical knowledge has been included. Limits to lay constructions of osteoporosis based on such evidence are discussed. Talking about osteoporosis across generations the women applied different explanations for the condition over time. In doing so, they also showed that they have adopted the morality of the new public health where the individual has control over her health through self-governance. Whereas this was no option for their grandmothers, their grandchildren's generation was seen as one failing to meet their obligations to become healthy citizens. The lay construction of osteoporosis can thus be seen as one that has developed from a situation where osteoporotic persons were perceived as victims of harsh circumstances to one of individual responsibility.

Suggested Citation

  • Skolbekken, John-Arne & Østerlie, Wenche & Forsmo, Siri, 2008. "Brittle bones, pain and fractures - Lay constructions of osteoporosis among Norwegian women attending the Nord-Trøndelag Health Study (HUNT)," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(12), pages 2562-2572, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:12:p:2562-2572
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(08)00114-7
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Davison, Charlie & Frankel, Stephen & Smith, George Davey, 1992. "The limits of lifestyle: Re-assessing 'fatalism' in the popular culture of illness prevention," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 675-685, March.
    2. Scott, S. & Prior, L. & Wood, F. & Gray, J., 2005. "Repositioning the patient: the implications of being 'at risk'," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(8), pages 1869-1879, April.
    3. Skolbekken, John-Arne, 1995. "The risk epidemic in medical journals," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 291-305, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Erol, Maral, 2011. "Melting bones: The social construction of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Turkey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(10), pages 1490-1497.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Waters, Erika A. & Ball, Linda & Gehlert, Sarah, 2017. "“I don’t believe it.” Acceptance and skepticism of genetic health information among African-American and White smokers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 153-160.
    2. Amaechi D. Okonkwo, 2013. "Generational Perspectives of Unprotected Sex and Sustainable Behavior Change in Nigeria," SAGE Open, , vol. 3(1), pages 21582440124, January.
    3. Salter, Charlotte Ingrid & Howe, Amanda & McDaid, Lisa & Blacklock, Jeanette & Lenaghan, Elizabeth & Shepstone, Lee, 2011. "Risk, significance and biomedicalisation of a new population: Older women's experience of osteoporosis screening," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 73(6), pages 808-815, September.
    4. Paul Stenner & Raffaele De Luca Picione, 2023. "A Theoretically Informed Critical Review of Research Applying the Concept of Liminality to Understand Experiences with Cancer: Implications for a New Oncological Agenda in Health Psychology," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(11), pages 1-21, May.
    5. Samantha Batchelor & Emma R. Miller & Belinda Lunnay & Sara Macdonald & Paul R. Ward, 2021. "Revisiting Candidacy: What Might It Offer Cancer Prevention?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-14, September.
    6. Armstrong, David, 2023. "The social life of risk probabilities in medicine," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    7. Scott, S. & Prior, L. & Wood, F. & Gray, J., 2005. "Repositioning the patient: the implications of being 'at risk'," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(8), pages 1869-1879, April.
    8. Peretti-Watel, Patrick & Moatti, Jean-Paul, 2006. "Understanding risk behaviours: How the sociology of deviance may contribute? The case of drug-taking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 675-679, August.
    9. Gavin Daker-White & Caroline Sanders & Anne Rogers & Ivaylo Vassliev & Christian Blickem & Sudeh Cheraghi-Sohi, 2014. "A Constellation of Misfortune," SAGE Open, , vol. 4(4), pages 21582440145, November.
    10. Armaan A Rowther & Asiya K Kazi & Huma Nazir & Maria Atiq & Najia Atif & Nida Rauf & Abid Malik & Pamela J Surkan, 2020. "“A Woman Is a Puppet.” Women’s Disempowerment and Prenatal Anxiety in Pakistan: A Qualitative Study of Sources, Mitigators, and Coping Strategies for Anxiety in Pregnancy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-19, July.
    11. Bell, Ann V. & Hetterly, Elizabeth, 2014. "“There's a higher power, but He gave us a free will”: Socioeconomic status and the intersection of agency and fatalism in infertility," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 66-72.
    12. Jae-Mahn Shim, 2022. "Patient Agency: Manifestations of Individual Agency Among People With Health Problems," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440221, March.
    13. Sutton, E. & Martin, G. & Eborall, H. & Tarrant, C., 2023. "Undertaking risk and relational work to manage vulnerability: Acute medical patients’ involvement in patient safety in the NHS," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 320(C).
    14. Caiata-Zufferey, Maria, 2015. "Genetically at-risk status and individual agency. A qualitative study on asymptomatic women living with genetic risk of breast/ovarian cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 141-148.
    15. Emslie, Carol & Hunt, Kate, 2008. "The weaker sex? Exploring lay understandings of gender differences in life expectancy: A qualitative study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 808-816, September.
    16. Nettleton, Sarah, 2006. "'I just want permission to be ill': Towards a sociology of medically unexplained symptoms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(5), pages 1167-1178, March.
    17. Armstrong, Natalie & Murphy, Elizabeth, 2008. "Weaving meaning? An exploration of the interplay between lay and professional understandings of cervical cancer risk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(7), pages 1074-1082, October.
    18. Will, Catherine M. & Armstrong, David & Marteau, Theresa M., 2010. "Genetic unexceptionalism: Clinician accounts of genetic testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 910-917, September.
    19. Goldsmith, Daena J. & Lindholm, Kristin A. & Bute, Jennifer J., 2006. "Dilemmas of talking about lifestyle changes among couples coping with a cardiac event," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 2079-2090, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:12:p:2562-2572. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.