IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v64y2007i7p1487-1500.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deciding to resuscitate extremely premature babies: How do parents and neonatologists engage in the decision?

Author

Listed:
  • Payot, Antoine
  • Gendron, Sylvie
  • Lefebvre, Francine
  • Doucet, Hubert

Abstract

Parents at risk of delivering a baby at the threshold of viability are faced with a critical decision. When a child is born between 23 and 25 weeks of gestation, parents are asked to decide whether or not to resuscitate their child. In essence, they are faced with a choice between life and death. We conducted a qualitative study to explore how parents and neonatologists engage in decision-making in a context of imminent and unplanned delivery at the threshold of viability. Twelve parents and attending neonatologists in a specialized tertiary care centre in Montreal, Canada were separately interviewed immediately following neonatal consultation. Results highlight how neonatologists and parents engage in decision making from different standpoints: while neonatologists focus on the management of the unborn baby, parents have yet to fully conceptualize their infant as a distinct entity since they are in a process of grieving their pregnancy and their parenthood project. Moreover, in their attempt to ensure an informed decision, neonatologists adopt either of two models through provision of the most up-to-date and objective information available: "remaining as neutral as possible to allow parents to make their own decision", or, "formulating a proposal to which parents can choose or not to assent". Overall, if the provided information fits parents' expectations, they tend to feel confident with their decision. However, if it does not take their experience into account, their decision is experienced as a solitary process. Parents express the need to receive more than just factual information from neonatologists. They also require support and engagement from caregivers to manage the uncertainty. This brings into question the traditional concept of neutral informed consent and suggests the necessity of a shared decision-making model to ensure that the decision to resuscitate extremely premature babies, at the limits of viability, becomes a truly ethical task.

Suggested Citation

  • Payot, Antoine & Gendron, Sylvie & Lefebvre, Francine & Doucet, Hubert, 2007. "Deciding to resuscitate extremely premature babies: How do parents and neonatologists engage in the decision?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 1487-1500, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:7:p:1487-1500
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(06)00598-3
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Orfali, Kristina, 2004. "Parental role in medical decision-making: fact or fiction? A comparative study of ethical dilemmas in French and American neonatal intensive care units," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 58(10), pages 2009-2022, May.
    2. Vermeulen, Eric, 2004. "Dealing with doubt: Making decisions in a neonatal ward in The Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(10), pages 2071-2085, November.
    3. Levin, Betty Wolder, 1990. "International perspectives on treatment choice in neonatal intensive care units," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 30(8), pages 901-912, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gerrits, Trudie & Reis, Ria & Braat, Didi, D.M. & Kremer, Jan, A.M. & Hardon, Anita, P., 2013. "Bioethics in practice: Addressing ethically sensitive requests in a Dutch fertility clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 330-339.
    2. Wang, Sophie Y. & Cantarelli, Paola & Groene, Oliver & Stargardt, Tom & Belle, Nicola, 2023. "Patient expectations do matter - Experimental evidence on antibiotic prescribing decisions among hospital-based physicians," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 11-17.
    3. Janet Green & Philip Darbyshire & Anne Adams & Debra Jackson, 2015. "Balancing hope with reality: how neonatal nurses manage the uncertainty of caring for extremely premature babies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2410-2418, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:64:y:2007:i:7:p:1487-1500. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.