IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v59y2004i10p2071-2085.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with doubt: Making decisions in a neonatal ward in The Netherlands

Author

Listed:
  • Vermeulen, Eric

Abstract

Neonatology provides intensive care for newborns. Most of the patients in a neonatal ward have been born prematurely. In this article decision-making concerning children born very prematurely (at fewer than 28 weeks, 12 or more weeks too early) is described. Three phases of daily practice are discussed: birth, treatment and referral or death. The article is based on ethnographic research conducted in the neonatal ward of the Amsterdam University Hospital. This ward's policy is to refrain from starting life-prolonging treatment for some children. This is done when staff members consider their chances too small. When life-prolonging treatment is started it is done provisionally and with trial-like features. Staff members want to judge the acceptability of the child's future quality of life. If they think it is unacceptable, they want to stop life-prolonging treatment. Parents play an important role in decision-making because their consent is needed for such decisions. More importantly, staff members need parental input about what, for that particular child and those parents, is seen as a good, bad or acceptable quality of future life. Decision-making shows a specific characteristic. Parents are informed about their child in sober terms and because they have considerable opportunities to influence decision-making it is argued that the processes taking place in the ward reflect the Dutch 'negotiation culture'.

Suggested Citation

  • Vermeulen, Eric, 2004. "Dealing with doubt: Making decisions in a neonatal ward in The Netherlands," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 59(10), pages 2071-2085, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:10:p:2071-2085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(04)00112-1
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Payot, Antoine & Gendron, Sylvie & Lefebvre, Francine & Doucet, Hubert, 2007. "Deciding to resuscitate extremely premature babies: How do parents and neonatologists engage in the decision?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(7), pages 1487-1500, April.
    2. Gerrits, Trudie & Reis, Ria & Braat, Didi, D.M. & Kremer, Jan, A.M. & Hardon, Anita, P., 2013. "Bioethics in practice: Addressing ethically sensitive requests in a Dutch fertility clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 330-339.
    3. Janet Green & Philip Darbyshire & Anne Adams & Debra Jackson, 2015. "Balancing hope with reality: how neonatal nurses manage the uncertainty of caring for extremely premature babies," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 24(17-18), pages 2410-2418, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:59:y:2004:i:10:p:2071-2085. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.